Arwin Shrestha1,2, Brittany N Allen1, Luke A Wiley2, Budd A Tucker2, Kristan S Worthington1,2. 1. Roy J. Carver Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa. 2. Institute for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Roy J. Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Abstract
Purpose: Widely used approaches for retinal disease modeling and in vitro therapeutic testing can be augmented by using tissue-engineered scaffolds with a precise 3-dimensional structure. However, the materials currently used for these scaffolds are poorly matched to the biochemical and mechanical properties of the in vivo retina. Here, we create biopolymer-based scaffolds with a structure that is amenable to retinal tissue engineering and modeling. Methods: Optimal two-photon polymerization (TPP) settings, including laser power and scanning speed, are identified for 4 methacrylated biopolymer formulations: collagen, gelatin, hyaluronic acid (HA), and a 50/50 mixture of gelatin/HA, each with methylene blue as a photoinitiator. For select formulations, fabrication accuracy and swelling are determined and biocompatibility is evaluated by using human induced pluripotent stem cells and rat postnatal retinal cells. Results: TPP is feasible for each biopolymer formulation, but it is the most reliable for mixtures containing gelatin and the least reliable for HA alone. The mean size of microscaffold pores is within several microns of the intended value but the overall structure size is several times greater than the modeled volume. The addition of HA to gelatin scaffolds increases cell viability and promotes neuronal phenotype, including Tuj-1 expression and characteristic morphology. Conclusion: We successfully determined a useful range of TPP settings for 4 methacrylated biopolymer formulations. When crosslinked, these extracellular matrix-derived molecules support the growth and attachment of retinal cells. We anticipate that when combined with existing patient-specific approaches, this technique will enable more efficient and accurate retinal disease modeling and therapeutic testing in vitro than current techniques allow.
Purpose: Widely used approaches for retinal disease modeling and in vitro therapeutic testing can be augmented by using tissue-engineered scaffolds with a precise 3-dimensional structure. However, the materials currently used for these scaffolds are poorly matched to the biochemical and mechanical properties of the in vivo retina. Here, we create biopolymer-based scaffolds with a structure that is amenable to retinal tissue engineering and modeling. Methods: Optimal two-photon polymerization (TPP) settings, including laser power and scanning speed, are identified for 4 methacrylated biopolymer formulations: collagen, gelatin, hyaluronic acid (HA), and a 50/50 mixture of gelatin/HA, each with methylene blue as a photoinitiator. For select formulations, fabrication accuracy and swelling are determined and biocompatibility is evaluated by using human induced pluripotent stem cells and rat postnatal retinal cells. Results:TPP is feasible for each biopolymer formulation, but it is the most reliable for mixtures containing gelatin and the least reliable for HA alone. The mean size of microscaffold pores is within several microns of the intended value but the overall structure size is several times greater than the modeled volume. The addition of HA to gelatin scaffolds increases cell viability and promotes neuronal phenotype, including Tuj-1 expression and characteristic morphology. Conclusion: We successfully determined a useful range of TPP settings for 4 methacrylated biopolymer formulations. When crosslinked, these extracellular matrix-derived molecules support the growth and attachment of retinal cells. We anticipate that when combined with existing patient-specific approaches, this technique will enable more efficient and accurate retinal disease modeling and therapeutic testing in vitro than current techniques allow.
Entities:
Keywords:
3D printing; extracellular matrix; retina; tissue engineering
Authors: So Young Kim; Joydip Kundu; Asher Williams; Anastasia S Yandulskaya; James R Monaghan; Rebecca L Carrier; Robert J Linhardt Journal: Glycoconj J Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 2.916
Authors: Kristan S Worthington; Luke A Wiley; Alexandra M Bartlett; Edwin M Stone; Robert F Mullins; Aliasger K Salem; C Allan Guymon; Budd A Tucker Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Luke A Wiley; Erin R Burnight; Allison E Songstad; Arlene V Drack; Robert F Mullins; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Kristan S Worthington; Luke A Wiley; Emily E Kaalberg; Malia M Collins; Robert F Mullins; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Brian G Ballios; Michael J Cooke; Laura Donaldson; Brenda L K Coles; Cindi M Morshead; Derek van der Kooy; Molly S Shoichet Journal: Stem Cell Reports Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 7.765
Authors: Rion J Wendland; Chunhua Jiao; Stephen R Russell; Ian C Han; Luke A Wiley; Budd A Tucker; Elliott H Sohn; Kristan S Worthington Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 3.770
Authors: In-Kyu Lee; Allison L Ludwig; M Joseph Phillips; Juhwan Lee; Ruosen Xie; Benjamin S Sajdak; Lindsey D Jager; Shaoqin Gong; David M Gamm; Zhenqiang Ma Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 14.136