Literature DB >> 30429251

Clinical Performance of the BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total & RPR Assay at a Tertiary Medical Center with a High Rate of Syphilis.

Merih T Tesfazghi1, Neil W Anderson1, Ann M Gronowski1, Melanie L Yarbrough2.   

Abstract

Manual treponemal and nontreponemal serologic testing has historically been used for the diagnosis of syphilis. This approach is simple and reproducible but labor intensive. Recently, the FDA cleared the fully automated BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total & RPR assay for the detection of treponemal and nontreponemal antibodies. We evaluated the clinical performance of this assay at a tertiary medical center with a high syphilis prevalence. Prospective consecutively collected (n = 400) and known RPR-positive (n = 100) specimens were compared using predicate manual rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA) methods and the BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total & RPR assay. Positive and negative percent agreements (PPA and NPA, respectively) between the assays were calculated. The PPA and NPA between the manual and BioPlex 2200 RPR results for the prospective population were 85% (17/20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 69% to 100%) and 98% (373/380; 95% CI, 97% to 99%), respectively. The PPA for the manual RPR-positive population was 88% (88/100; 95% CI, 82% to 94%). Overall, the manual and BioPlex 2200 RPR titers demonstrated 78% (99/127) concordance within ±1 dilution and 94% (120/127) within ±2 dilutions. An interpretation of the syphilis serologic profile using the traditional algorithm showed a concordance of 99.5% in the prospective population and 85% in the manual RPR-positive cohort. The performance of the BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total & RPR assay is comparable to those of manual methods. The high NPA of this assay combined with the ability to automate a historically labor-intensive assay is an appealing attribute for syphilis screening in a high-volume laboratory.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BioPlex; FTA; RPR; syphilis; traditional algorithm

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30429251      PMCID: PMC6322462          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01487-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  15 in total

1.  Direct comparison of the traditional and reverse syphilis screening algorithms in a population with a low prevalence of syphilis.

Authors:  Matthew J Binnicker; Deborah J Jespersen; Leonard O Rollins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015.

Authors:  Kimberly A Workowski; Gail A Bolan
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2015-06-05

Review 3.  The ABCs of STIs: An Update on Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Authors:  Melanie L Yarbrough; Carey-Ann D Burnham
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Treponema-specific tests for serodiagnosis of syphilis: comparative evaluation of seven assays.

Authors:  M J Binnicker; D J Jespersen; L O Rollins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of the Bio-Rad BioPlex 2200 syphilis multiplex flow immunoassay for the detection of IgM- and IgG-class antitreponemal antibodies.

Authors:  E Gomez; D J Jespersen; J A Harring; M J Binnicker
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2010-04-28

6.  Use of Treponemal Screening Assay Strength of Signal to Avoid Unnecessary Confirmatory Testing.

Authors:  Gregory J Berry; Michael J Loeffelholz
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Serologic response to treatment of infectious syphilis.

Authors:  B Romanowski; R Sutherland; G H Fick; D Mooney; E J Love
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Syphilis testing algorithms using treponemal tests for initial screening--four laboratories, New York City, 2005-2006.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 9.  Current trend on syphilis diagnosis: issues and challenges.

Authors:  Muhammad G Morshed
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Traditional versus reverse syphilis algorithms: A comparison at a large academic medical center.

Authors:  Craig D Dunseth; Bradley A Ford; Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2017-04-29
View more
  3 in total

1.  High Agreement of the BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total & RPR Assay with the Confirmatory Treponemal Test on Weak Positive Screening Samples.

Authors:  Emilie De Maertelaere; Casper Van den Borre; Sara Bourgois; Marjan Van Esbroeck; Sandra Deridder; Sofie Blomme; Elizaveta Padalko
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Brazilian Protocol for Sexually Transmitted Infections 2020: syphilis diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Pâmela Cristina Gaspar; Álisson Bigolin; José Boullosa Alonso Neto; Esdras Daniel Dos Santos Pereira; Maria Luiza Bazzo
Journal:  Rev Soc Bras Med Trop       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 1.581

3.  Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 syphilis total screen (IgG/IgM) with reflex to an automated rapid plasma reagin test.

Authors:  Angela R Rourk; Christine M Litwin
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 2.352

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.