Literature DB >> 27835625

Use of Treponemal Screening Assay Strength of Signal to Avoid Unnecessary Confirmatory Testing.

Gregory J Berry1, Michael J Loeffelholz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our reverse syphilis testing algorithm consists of a treponemal IgG multiplex flow immunoassay (MFI) followed by both rapid plasma reagin titer and the Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) test on specimens with a reactive MFI result. We report here the impact of a modified reverse algorithm, in which the strength of signal of the MFI is used to avoid unnecessary TPPA testing.
METHODS: The Bioplex syphilis IgG MFI was used as the syphilis screening assay, and specimens with equivocal (antibody index 0.9 or 1.0), or reactive (antibody index ≥ 1.1) results were further tested by rapid plasma reagin titer and TPPA test. We performed a retrospective, descriptive analysis of all specimens received for syphilis screening between January and May of 2014. A cost analysis was performed, taking into account labor and reagent expenses.
RESULTS: In our diverse patient population consisting of high-risk incarcerated persons, low-risk obstetrical/gynecological patients and high-risk miscellaneous clinic and inpatients, 430 (65%) of 665 MFI-positive specimens had antibody indices of 8 or greater. Greater than 99% of these specimens were reactive by the TPPA test. Avoiding TPPA testing of specimens with an MFI antibody index ≥8 would save over US $4800 annually in laboratory costs.
CONCLUSIONS: The TPPA testing is unnecessary on specimens with MFI antibody indices ≥8. This would substantially reduce the TPPA testing volume and also reduce laboratory expenses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27835625     DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  6 in total

1.  Clinical Performance of the BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total & RPR Assay at a Tertiary Medical Center with a High Rate of Syphilis.

Authors:  Merih T Tesfazghi; Neil W Anderson; Ann M Gronowski; Melanie L Yarbrough
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Correlation of Treponemal Immunoassay Signal Strength Values with Reactivity of Confirmatory Treponemal Testing.

Authors:  Yetunde F Fakile; Heather Jost; Karen W Hoover; Kathleen J Gustafson; Susan M Novak-Weekley; Jeff M Schapiro; Anthony Tran; Joan M Chow; Ina U Park
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Analytical Comparison of the Architect Syphilis TP and Liaison Treponema Automated Chemiluminescent Immunoassays and Their Performance in a Reverse Syphilis Screening Algorithm.

Authors:  Alan M Sanfilippo; Kristie Freeman; John L Schmitz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Limited Utility of Reverse Algorithm Syphilis Testing in HIV Clinic Among Men Who Have Sex With Men.

Authors:  Jodie Dionne-Odom; Barbara Van Der Pol; Alex Boutwell; Niranjan Biligowda; Daphne G Schmid; Edward W Hook
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  The Traditional or Reverse Algorithm for Diagnosis of Syphilis: Pros and Cons.

Authors:  Daniel A Ortiz; Mayur R Shukla; Michael J Loeffelholz
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Improvement of reverse sequence algorithm for syphilis diagnosis using optimal treponemal screening assay signal-to-cutoff ratio.

Authors:  Bouchra Serhir; Annie-Claude Labbé; Florence Doualla-Bell; Marc Simard; Gilles Lambert; Annick Trudelle; Jean Longtin; Cécile Tremblay; Claude Fortin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.