Literature DB >> 8086843

Psychosocial risk factors during pregnancy. What do family physicians ask about?

J C Carroll1, A J Reid, A Biringer, L M Wilson, D K Midmer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether physician characteristics affect attitudes or practices regarding assessment of psychosocial risk factors during pregnancy, and to evaluate whether an antenatal psychosocial risk factor assessment form would help family physicians. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A questionnaire asking physicians to rate the importance of information on a scale of one to five was mailed to all active members of the University of Toronto Department of Family and Community Medicine's Survey Network of Attitudes and Practice (SNAP). PARTICIPANTS: A volunteer sample of physicians doing prenatal and intrapartum obstetrics who are active members of SNAP. The network is made up of full-time faculty in the University of Toronto's family practice units and teaching practice physicians (rural, suburban, and urban) who are interested in participating in research projects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response rate was 78%. Responses of the 45 SNAP members who did not practise obstetrics were excluded; 125 of 218 questionnaires mailed were analyzed.
RESULTS: Women family physicians rated the form potentially helpful more frequently than their male colleagues. Urban and suburban physicians' concerns differed from those of rural physicians. Alcohol and drug abuse, abuse in the relationship, and acceptance of the pregnancy were rated highly important by physicians. Of the physicians surveyed, 77% thought that an antenatal psychosocial risk assessment form would be of some benefit or very helpful. Only 15% indicated it would be useless or not helpful.
CONCLUSION: The importance respondents accorded to risk factors showed little correspondence to the frequency of inquiry about them. The survey confirmed our plan to design an antenatal psychosocial risk factor assessment form.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8086843      PMCID: PMC2380162     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  26 in total

1.  Predicting child abuse and neglect in New Zealand.

Authors:  R C Muir; S M Monaghan; R J Gilmore; J E Clarkson; T J Crooks; T G Egan
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.744

2.  Psychosocial assets, life crisis and the prognosis of pregnancy.

Authors:  K B Nuckolls; B H Kaplan; J Cassel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  The transition to parenthood: II. Stability and change in marital structure.

Authors:  J M Lewis
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  1988-09

4.  Perceived and received support: effects on health behavior during pregnancy.

Authors:  L S Aaronson
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Periodic health examination, 1993 update: 1. Primary prevention of child maltreatment. The Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  H L MacMillan; J H MacMillan; D R Offord
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-01-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Stress and coping in first pregnancy: couple-family physician interaction.

Authors:  P Williamson; E C English
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Battered wife syndrome.

Authors:  R W Swanson
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  The battered woman.

Authors:  P Mehta; L A Dandrea
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.292

9.  Physical abuse in pregnancy.

Authors:  P J Hillard
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Marital support during pregnancy.

Authors:  M A Brown
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec
View more
  5 in total

1.  Disparate patterns of prenatal care utilization stratified by medical and psychosocial risk.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Krans; Matthew M Davis; Christie L Palladino
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-05

2.  Effectiveness of the Antenatal Psychosocial Health Assessment (ALPHA) form in detecting psychosocial concerns: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Anthony J Reid; Anne Biringer; Deana Midmer; Richard H Glazier; Lynn Wilson; Joanne A Permaul; Patricia Pugh; Beverley Chalmers; Freda Seddon; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Impact of psychosocial risk factors on prenatal care delivery: a national provider survey.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Krans; Nicholas M Moloci; Michelle T Housey; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-12

4.  Assessing antenatal psychosocial health. Randomized controlled trial of two versions of the ALPHA form.

Authors:  Deana Midmer; Janet Bryanton; Rona Brown
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Using the ALPHA form in practice to assess antenatal psychosocial health. Antenatal Psychosocial Health Assessment.

Authors:  A J Reid; A Biringer; J D Carroll; D Midmer; L M Wilson; B Chalmers; D E Stewart
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-09-22       Impact factor: 8.262

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.