Literature DB >> 30427805

Visual Attention Affects the Amplitude of the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-associated Motor-evoked Potential: A Preliminary Study With Clinical Utility.

Spencer J Bell1, Abigail Lauer, Daniel H Lench, Colleen A Hanlon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-elicited motor-evoked potential (MEP) is a valuable measure for clinical evaluations of various neurological disorders and is used to determine resting motor threshold for repetitive TMS dosing. Although MEP amplitude is primarily associated with motor system function, there is evidence that nonmotor factors may also influence amplitude. This experiment tested the hypotheses that manipulation of 2 factors (visual attention, cognitive regulation) in human participants would significantly affect MEP amplitude.
METHODS: Blocks of MEPs were recorded from the dominant right hand as participants (N=20) were instructed to shift their visual attention (toward and away from the hand) and cognitively regulate the MEPs (rest, attenuate MEP amplitude, potentiate MEP amplitude) using their thoughts (6 blocks, 20 pulses/block, randomized, 110% resting motor threshold).
RESULTS: MEP amplitude was significantly affected by the direction of visual attention; looking away from the hand led to higher amplitudes (P=0.003). The relationship with cognitive regulation was nonsignificant.
CONCLUSIONS: The significant effect of visual attention on MEP suggests that this should be a standardized parameter in clinical and research studies. These data underscore the importance of rigorous reporting of methods and use of standardized practices for MEP acquisition and TMS dosing to ensure consistent clinical measurement and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30427805      PMCID: PMC6530802          DOI: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract        ISSN: 1527-4160            Impact factor:   1.325


  32 in total

1.  Neural activity in human primary motor cortex areas 4a and 4p is modulated differentially by attention to action.

Authors:  F Binkofski; G R Fink; S Geyer; G Buccino; O Gruber; N J Shah; J G Taylor; R J Seitz; K Zilles; H-J Freund
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Suppression of corticospinal excitability during negative motor imagery.

Authors:  Young H Sohn; Nguyet Dang; Mark Hallett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Improved motor skill acquisition after selective stimulation of central norepinephrine.

Authors:  Christian Plewnia; Julia Hoppe; Leonardo G Cohen; Christian Gerloff
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Cortico-motoneuronal output to intrinsic hand muscles is differentially influenced by static changes in shoulder positions.

Authors:  F Dominici; T Popa; F Ginanneschi; R Mazzocchio; A Rossi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Estimating resting motor thresholds in transcranial magnetic stimulation research and practice: a computer simulation evaluation of best methods.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Borckardt; Ziad Nahas; Jejo Koola; Mark S George
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.635

6.  Eye movements as a probe of attention.

Authors:  Albert Hoang Duc; Paul Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.453

7.  Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke. A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses.

Authors:  R Traversa; P Cicinelli; A Bassi; P M Rossini; G Bernardi
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Optimising the detection of upper motor neuron function dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis--a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Abena D Osei-Lah; Kerry R Mills
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  L Fadiga; L Fogassi; G Pavesi; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  An unavoidable modulation? Sensory attention and human primary motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  Diane Ruge; Neil Muggleton; Damon Hoad; Antonio Caronni; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.386

View more
  2 in total

1.  Delayed activation of leg somatotopic fibers of an injured corticospinal tract in a patient with cerebral infarction.

Authors:  Min Jye Cho; Sung Ho Jang
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2022-11       Impact factor: 6.058

2.  Fast acquisition of resting motor threshold with a stimulus-response curve - Possibility or hazard for transcranial magnetic stimulation applications?

Authors:  Elisa Kallioniemi; Friedemann Awiszus; Minna Pitkänen; Petro Julkunen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2021-12-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.