Literature DB >> 8996498

Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke. A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses.

R Traversa1, P Cicinelli, A Bassi, P M Rossini, G Bernardi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Focal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TCS) is used for noninvasive and painless mapping of the somatotopical organization of the motor cortex. TCS mapping of motor cortical output to the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle was followed up in monohemispheric stroke patients by evaluating motor evoked potentials (MEPs). This approach allowed noninvasive investigation of the functional reorganization of hand motor areas.
METHODS: Motor maps were constructed for 15 subacute stroke patients about 2 months from the ictus by recording MEPs from the ADM muscle via focal TCS in the affected hemisphere (AH) and unaffected hemisphere (UH) at the beginning of (T1) and after 8 to 10 weeks of neurorehabilitation (T2). Barthel Index and Canadian Neurological Scale scores were evaluated as well. An age-sex matched group of 15 healthy control subjects was enrolled to establish normative data.
RESULTS: MEP excitability threshold was significantly higher in the AH of stroke patients than in normal subjects and in the UH (P < .001); excitability threshold was not significantly different between normal subjects and UH. In the AH, MEPs were significantly (P < .001) delayed in latency both in T1 and T2, with a significant decrease of the extenuation of motor output area to the ADM muscle (P < .05) in T1 versus control group and UH. This area was significantly enlarged (P < .05) in T2. Amplitude of MEPs from the AH, both at rest and during voluntary contraction, was significantly lower than normal in T1 (P < .001); it increased in T2 (P < .01) during relaxation but was still smaller than normal during contraction (P < .001). In combination with these findings, an improvement of Barthel Index and Canadian Neurological Scale scores (P < .001) was observed between T1 and T2 (P < .001). Central conduction time was prolonged in stroke patients both in T1 and T2. Changes in the shape of motor maps in the AH during follow-up in T2 were either isolated (therefore increasing the interhemispheric asymmetry) or also were "mirrored" on the UH.
CONCLUSIONS: Our neurophysiological data are consistent with the presence of a rearrangement of the motor cortical output area and correlate well with an improvement of motor performances. These findings confirm the existence in adults of a "plasticity" in the central nervous system that is still operating between 2 and 4 months from the acute ictal episode. The observed neurophysiological modifications are significantly correlated with clinical improvement of disability and clinical scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8996498     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.28.1.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  81 in total

1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation coregistered with MRI: a comparison of a guided versus blind stimulation technique and its effect on evoked compound muscle action potentials.

Authors:  L D Gugino; J R Romero; L Aglio; D Titone; M Ramirez; A Pascual-Leone; E Grimson; N Weisenfeld; R Kikinis; M E Shenton
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Shifts in cortical representations predict human discrimination improvement.

Authors:  B Pleger; H R Dinse; P Ragert; P Schwenkreis; J P Malin; M Tegenthoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Training-induced modifications of corticospinal reactivity in severely affected stroke survivors.

Authors:  Ruth N Barker; Sandra G Brauer; Benjamin K Barry; Toby J Gill; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Contemporary linkages between EMG, kinetics and stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Steven L Wolf; Andrew J Butler; Jay L Alberts; Min Wook Kim
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.368

5.  Modifiability of abnormal isometric elbow and shoulder joint torque coupling after stroke.

Authors:  Michael D Ellis; Bradley G Holubar; Ana Maria Acosta; Randall F Beer; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  Impairment-oriented training and adaptive motor cortex reorganisation after stroke: a fTMS study.

Authors:  T Platz; S van Kaick; L Möller; S Freund; T Winter; I-H Kim
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Dynamic changes in corticospinal tracts after stroke detected by fibretracking.

Authors:  M Møller; J Frandsen; G Andersen; A Gjedde; P Vestergaard-Poulsen; L Østergaard
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 8.  Movement-dependent stroke recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence.

Authors:  Lorie G Richards; Kim C Stewart; Michelle L Woodbury; Claudia Senesac; James H Cauraugh
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Variability of fMRI-response patterns at different spatial observation scales.

Authors:  Tonio Ball; Thomas P K Breckel; Isabella Mutschler; Ad Aertsen; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Jürgen Hennig; Oliver Speck
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study.

Authors:  N S Ward; M M Brown; A J Thompson; R S J Frackowiak
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-08-22       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.