| Literature DB >> 30425820 |
Adil Deniz Duru1, Taylan Hayri Balcioglu1.
Abstract
The structural and functional neural differences between the elite karate athletes and control group have been investigated in the concept of this study. 13 elite karate athletes and age-gender matched 13 volunteers who have not performed regular exercises participated in the study. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to acquire the anatomical and functional maps. T1-weighted anatomical images were segmented to form gray and white matter images. Voxel-based morphometry is used to elucidate the differences between the groups. Moreover, resting state functional measurements had been done, and group independent component analysis was implemented in order to exhibit the resting state networks. Then, second-level general linear models were used to compute the statistical maps. It has been revealed that increased GM volume values of inferior/superior temporal, occipital, premotor cortex, and temporal pole superior were present for the elite athletes. Additionally, WM values were found to be increased in caudate nucleus, hypothalamus, and mammilary region for the elite karate players. Similarly, for the elite karate players, the brain regions involved in the movement planning and visual perception are found to have higher connectivity values. The differences in these findings can be thought to be originated from the advances gained through the several years of training which is required to be an elite karate athlete.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30425820 PMCID: PMC6218732 DOI: 10.1155/2018/8310975
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Voxel-based differences of GM deduced by using the contrast elite > control subjects exhibiting six significant clusters having at least 20 clusters are summarized.
| Cluster p (FWE) | Cluster k | Peak p (FWE) | Peak T |
|
|
| Label |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0001 | 215 | 0.0002 | 9.89 | 58.5 | −52.5 | −27 | b (inferior temporal, R) |
| 0.0355 | 6.52 | 55.5 | −48 | −40.5 | e (temporal pole superior, R) | ||
| 0.0088 | 29 | 0.0008 | 8.77 | 28 | 20 | 58 | c (premotor cortex, R) |
| 0.0000 | 242 | 0.0012 | 8.56 | 18 | 19.5 | −31.5 | f (cerebellum, R) |
| 0.0014 | 8.42 | 34.5 | 39 | −24 | |||
| 0.0017 | 8.33 | 33 | 31.5 | −27 | |||
| 0.0041 | 50 | 0.0024 | 8.11 | 46.5 | −85.5 | 15 | a (occipital-temporal v5 mi, R) |
| 0.0118 | 22 | 0.0042 | 7.76 | 46.5 | −43.5 | 1.5 | b (Inferior/superior temporal gyrus, ba20, R) |
| 0.0118 | 22 | 0.0083 | 7.36 | −64.5 | −61.5 | −3 | d (superior temporal, L) |
Each cluster is represented with a letter in Figure 1. Cluster level FWE corrected probability values are reported with the MNI coordinates with the statistical values of the peak voxel in the cluster. Peak T value stands for the maximum of t statistic value for a voxel in a cluster. Peak p (FWE) stands for the voxel level significance value, where at least one cluster with unspecified number of voxels is above the threshold (p < 0.05). The number of voxels above the threshold in a cluster is denoted with cluster k while the Cluster p (FWE) is the cluster level probability. MNI coordinates and corresponding anatomical names are represented by x, y, z and label, variables, respectively.
Voxel-based differences of WM deduced by using the contrast elite > control subjects exhibiting four significant clusters having at least 20 clusters are summarized.
| Cluster p (FWE) | Cluster Equivk | Peak p (FWE) | Peak T |
|
|
| Label |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0002 | 198 | 0.0000 | 10.39 | −9 | −7.5 | −19.5 | Mammillary region (b) |
| 0.0006 | 141 | 0.0005 | 8.76 | 10.5 | −4.5 | −16.5 | Hypothalamus (a) |
| 0.0156 | 6.70 | 15 | 3 | −13.5 | Hypothalamus (a) | ||
| 0.0017 | 97 | 0.0023 | 7.82 | 6 | 16.5 | 7.5 | Caudate nucleus right |
| 0.0097 | 33 | 0.0064 | 7.21 | −37.5 | 25.5 | 4.5 | Left insula (c) |
Each cluster is represented with a letter. The location of the clusters can be seen in Figure 2. Cluster level FWE corrected probability values are reported with the MNI coordinates with the statistical values of the peak voxel in the cluster. Peak T value stands for the maximum of t statistic value for a voxel in a cluster. Peak p (FWE) stands for the voxel level significance value where at least one cluster with unspecified number of voxels is above the threshold (p < 0.05). The number of voxels above the threshold in a cluster is denoted with the cluster k while the cluster p (FWE) is the cluster level probability. MNI coordinates and corresponding anatomical names are represented by x, y, z and label, variables, respectively.
Gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volume values (cm3) of each participant.
| Gender | Participant | GM volume (cm3) | WM volume (cm3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Elite 1 | 773.48 | 535.71 |
| Male | Elite 2 | 843.61 | 580.24 |
| Male | Elite 3 | 714.81 | 497.80 |
| Male | Elite 4 | 764.12 | 531.58 |
| Male | Elite 5 | 809.33 | 580.41 |
| Male | Elite 6 | 628.99 | 424.86 |
| Male | Elite 7 | 757.61 | 523.80 |
| Female | Elite 8 | 690.93 | 474.24 |
| Female | Elite 9 | 806.75 | 602.38 |
| Female | Elite 10 | 712.94 | 482.64 |
| Female | Elite 11 | 719.62 | 506.68 |
| Female | Elite 12 | 707.83 | 491.33 |
| Female | Elite 13 | 651.28 | 460.01 |
| Male | Control 1 | 778.48 | 548.15 |
| Male | Control 2 | 809.75 | 551.04 |
| Male | Control 3 | 685.72 | 512.70 |
| Male | Control 4 | 720.53 | 487.86 |
| Male | Control 5 | 710.02 | 478.28 |
| Male | Control 6 | 755.10 | 531.94 |
| Male | Control 7 | 787.03 | 514.16 |
| Female | Control 8 | 651.68 | 439.27 |
| Female | Control 9 | 684.17 | 452.25 |
| Female | Control 10 | 647.41 | 458.17 |
| Female | Control 11 | 645.99 | 453.02 |
| Female | Control 12 | 707.55 | 488.06 |
| Female | Control 13 | 630.77 | 425.28 |
Figure 1Significant GM differences are (elite > control) visualized with red blobs on the structural template cortical surface.
Figure 2Significant WM differences are (elite > control) visualized with red blobs on the structural template cortical surface.
Figure 3Mean RSN maps of the elite athletes and control subjects thresholded by Z > 2. Somatomotor network (a), executive (b), default mode network (c), visual (d), frontoparietal network, and (e) and (f).
Significant differences between elite karate players and control group deduced by the analysis of the second-level GLM for each RSN map.
| T | Z | p (unc) |
|
|
| Label |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.72 | 3.22 | <0.001 | 4 | −88 | 6 | Cuneus BA18 (R) |
| 5.21 | 4.13 | <0.0001 | 2 | 56 | −6 | Medial frontal gyrus (R) |
| 5.00 | 4.01 | <0.0001 | 60 | −60 | 26 | Superior temporal gyrus (R) |
| 4.66 | 3.82 | <0.0001 | 24 | −34 | 72 | Postcentral gyrus (R) |
| 3.74 | 3.24 | <0.001 | 44 | −34 | 58 | |
| 3.60 | 3.14 | <0.001 | 22 | −4 | 66 | Superior frontal gyrus (R) |
| 4.51 | 3.73 | <0.0001 | 4 | 26 | 50 | Superior frontal gyrus, frontal sup medial (R) |
| 4.22 | 3.55 | <0.001 | −42 | 32 | −2 | Left inferior frontal gyrus (L) |
| 4.15 | 3.49 | <0.001 | 10 | −76 | −28 | Cerebellum crus1 (R) |