| Literature DB >> 26909038 |
Jing Tao1, Jiao Liu2, Natalia Egorova3, Xiangli Chen4, Sharon Sun3, Xiehua Xue5, Jia Huang6, Guohua Zheng2, Qin Wang2, Lidian Chen6, Jian Kong3.
Abstract
Previous studies provide evidence that aging is associated with the decline of memory function and alterations in the hippocampal (HPC) function, including functional connectivity to the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). In this study, we investigated if longitudinal (12-week) Tai Chi Chuan and Baduanjin practice can improve memory function and modulate HPC resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC). Memory function measurements and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) were applied at the beginning and the end of the experiment. The results showed that (1) the memory quotient (MQ) measured by the Wechsler Memory Scale-Chinese Revision significantly increased after Tai Chi Chuan and Baduanjin practice as compared with the control group, and no significant difference was observed in MQ between the Tai Chi Chuan and Baduanjin groups; (2) rs-FC between the bilateral hippocampus and mPFC significantly increased in the Tai Chi Chuan group compared to the control group (also in the Baduanjin group compared to the control group, albeit at a lower threshold), and no significant difference between the Tai Chi Chuan and Baduanjin groups was observed; (3) rs-FC increases between the bilateral hippocampus and mPFC were significantly associated with corresponding memory function improvement across all subjects. Similar results were observed using the left or right hippocampus as seeds. Our results suggest that both Tai Chi Chuan and Baduanjin may be effective exercises to prevent memory decline during aging.Entities:
Keywords: Baduanjin exercise; Tai Chi Chuan exercise; aging; hippocampus; medial prefrontal cortex; memory function
Year: 2016 PMID: 26909038 PMCID: PMC4754402 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Figure 1Flow diagram for the screening, randomization, and completion of 12-week evaluations.
Figure 2(A) Bilateral, left, and right hippocampus as seeds. (B,D,F) Significant resting-state functional connectivity changes in the Tai Chi Chuan group compared to the control group (red) and the brain regions that showed significant association between the connectivity increase and memory improvement (blue), overlapping in the mPFC. (C,E,G) Scatter plots indicate the correlation between memory quotient (MQ) and Fisher’s Z values at the peak of the significant cluster, corrected for age, gender, and years of education. B, bilateral; R, right; L, left.
Demographics of study participants in different groups.
| Characteristics | Control ( | Tai Chi Chuan ( | Baduanjin ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age† | 59.76 (4.83) | 62.38 (4.55) | 62.18 (3.79) | 2.386 | – | 0.101 |
| Gender (female/male)‡ | 19/6 | 13/8 | 10/6 | – | 1.309 | 0.520 |
| Handedness (right/left) | 25/0 | 21/0 | 16/0 | – | ||
| Average years of education† | 8.52 (3.65) | 9.61 (3.02) | 9.06 (2.61) | 0.671 | – | 0.515 |
Control, control group; Tai Chi Chuan, Tai Chi Chuan group; Baduanjin, Baduanjin group.
*All values are means (SD) and .
.
.
Clinical outcome measurements in each group (pre- and posttreatment).
| MQ | Control ( | Tai Chi Chuan ( | Baduanjin ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pretreatment | 99.08 (14.59) | 105.81 (10.24) | 99.25 (8.99) |
| Posttreatment | 97.76 (13.92) | 123.57 (11.42) | 125.06 (10.87) |
Control, control group; Tai Chi Chuan, Tai Chi Chuan group; Baduanjin, Baduanjin group.
.
Regions show significant functional connectivity changes with the hippocampus.
| Seed | Contrast | Brain regions | Cluster size (voxels) | Peak | MNI coordinates (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bilateral hippocampus | Tai Chi > control | R mPFC | 1327 | 3.50 | 12 | 58 | 16 |
| L mPFC | 3.45 | −12 | 52 | 16 | |||
| L hippocampus | Tai Chi > control | R mPFC | 695 | 3.78 | 16 | 48 | 14 |
| L mPFC | 3.41 | −12 | 52 | 16 | |||
| R hippocampus | Tai Chi > control | R mPFC | 641 | 2.96 | 12 | 58 | 16 |
| L mPFC | 3.20 | −12 | 58 | 16 | |||
R, right; L, left; mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex.
Correlation between MQ and functional connectivity changes.
| Seed | Contrast | Brain regions | Cluster size (voxels) | Peak | MNI coordinates (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bilateral hippocampus | Positive | R mPFC | 1715 | 4.27 | 10 | 38 | 32 |
| L mPFC | 3.80 | −14 | 64 | 6 | |||
| L hippocampus | Positive | R mPFC | 675 | 4.00 | 12 | 32 | 40 |
| L mPFC | 3.63 | −14 | 64 | 6 | |||
| R hippocampus | Positive | R mPFC | 1073 | 4.17 | 10 | 38 | 32 |
| L mPFC | 3.59 | −16 | 38 | 40 | |||
R, right; L, left; mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex.