Literature DB >> 18445220

Motor learning affects visual movement perception.

Annerose Engel1, Michael Burke, Katja Fiehler, Siegfried Bien, Frank Rösler.   

Abstract

In the present study we investigated whether imitation of artificial movement trajectories of meaningless objects has an effect on how these trajectories are later perceptually processed within the human brain. During observation of a sequence of artificial object movements 10 participants (experimental group) actively imitated the trajectories during motor training and 10 participants (control group) solved a working memory task without motor training. The haemodynamic responses were recorded before and after the intervention while participants observed the movements and either had to detect colour changes of one of the objects (colour task, motor-irrelevant) or had to judge whether the movement pattern could be imitated with the hands (simulation judgement task, motor-relevant). The between-group comparison of the post-intervention haemodynamic responses revealed stronger activity for the motor training than for the control group during the simulation judgement task. This activity appeared in motor-related areas (supplementary motor area and inferior parietal lobe) and in the occipito-temporal area. During the colour task, the motor training group showed stronger activity in the occipital lobe. The control group did not reveal any stronger activity than the motor training group for either task. The results suggest that motor training has task-specific effects on neural processes that are involved in perception of movements. Furthermore, they indicate that motor-related areas are triggered by observed artificial object movements, but only if a motor-relevant task is pursued.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18445220     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06200.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  8 in total

1.  fMRI data visualization with BrainBlend and Blender.

Authors:  Martin Pyka; Matthias Hertog; Raul Fernandez; Sascha Hauke; Dominik Heider; Udo Dannlowski; Carsten Konrad
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2010-03

2.  The responsiveness of biological motion processing areas to selective attention towards goals.

Authors:  John Herrington; Charlotte Nymberg; Susan Faja; Elinora Price; Robert Schultz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The role of prediction in social neuroscience.

Authors:  Elliot C Brown; Martin Brüne
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 4.  What's Special about Human Imitation? A Comparison with Enculturated Apes.

Authors:  Francys Subiaul
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-07

5.  Functional and Structural Plasticity of Brain in Elite Karate Athletes.

Authors:  Adil Deniz Duru; Taylan Hayri Balcioglu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.682

6.  Investigating ideomotor cognition with motorvisual priming paradigms: key findings, methodological challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-23

7.  Motor expertise facilitates the accuracy of state extrapolation in perception.

Authors:  Nicolas Ludolph; Jannis Plöger; Martin A Giese; Winfried Ilg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Visually evoked responses are enhanced when engaging in a video game.

Authors:  Jason J Ki; Lucas C Parra; Jacek P Dmochowski
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 3.698

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.