Literature DB >> 30421314

Learning concepts when instances never repeat.

Donald Homa1, Mark Blair2, Samuel M McClure3, John Medema3, Gregory Stone3.   

Abstract

Three experiments explored the learning of categories where the training instances either repeated in each training block or appeared only once during the entire learning phase, followed by a classification transfer (Experiment 1) or a recognition transfer test (Experiments 2 and 3). Subjects received training instances from either two (Experiment 2) or three categories (Experiments 1-3) for either 15 or 20 training blocks. The results showed substantial learning in each experiment, with the notable result that learning was not slowed in the non-repeating condition in any of the three experiments. Furthermore, subsequent transfer was marginally better in the non-repeating condition. The recognition results showed that subjects in the repeat condition had substantial memory for the training instances, whereas subjects in the non-repeat condition had no measurable memory for the training instances, as measured either by hit and false-alarm rates or by signal detectability measures. These outcomes are consistent with prototype models of category learning, at least when patterns never repeat in learning, and place severe constraints on exemplar views that posit transfer mechanisms to stored individual traces. A formal model, which incorporates changing similarity relationships during learning, was shown to explain the major results.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30421314     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-018-0874-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  A single-system interpretation of dissociations between recognition and categorization in a task involving object-like stimuli.

Authors:  S R Zaki; R M Nosofsky
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Similarity-scaling studies of dot-pattern classification and recognition.

Authors:  H J Shin; R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1992-09

3.  Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.

Authors:  J David Smith; John Paul Minda
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Analogical transfer in perceptual categorization.

Authors:  Michael B Casale; Jessica L Roeder; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

Review 6.  On the adequacy of current empirical evaluations of formal models of categorization.

Authors:  Andy J Wills; Emmanuel M Pothos
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  The modulating influence of category size on the classification of exception patterns.

Authors:  Donald Homa; Michael J Proulx; Mark Blair
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Learning about categories that are defined by object-like stimuli despite impaired declarative memory.

Authors:  J M Reed; L R Squire; A L Patalano; E E Smith; J Jonides
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Prototypes in category learning: the effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity.

Authors:  J P Minda; J D Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge.

Authors:  B J Knowlton; L R Squire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.