Literature DB >> 12467086

A single-system interpretation of dissociations between recognition and categorization in a task involving object-like stimuli.

S R Zaki1, R M Nosofsky.   

Abstract

In previous research (Reed, Squire, Patalano, Smith, & Jonides, 1999), amnesic patients performed at near normal levels in a categorization task involving stimuli with discrete features, but showed impaired recall of the features. These results were taken as evidence of the existence of separate memory systems for categorization and recall/recognition. The present research addresses a single-system account of this dissociation. In Experiment 1, results closely matching the dissociation pattern were obtained when normal participants' classification and recognition performance was tested either immediately or after a week delay. In addition, formal modeling of the data suggested that participants use only a few of the dimensions in the categorization task, whereas they must use many dimensions in the cued-recall task. In Experiment 2, we found that many participants could perform the categorization task without any exposure to the training sequence. These results suggest that different memory demands across the two tasks may be responsible for the observed dissociation--separate memory systems are not necessarily involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12467086     DOI: 10.3758/cabn.1.4.344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  17 in total

1.  Contrasting cortical activity associated with category memory and recognition memory.

Authors:  P J Reber; C E Stark; L R Squire
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Alternative strategies of categorization.

Authors:  E E Smith; A L Patalano; J Jonides
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-01

Review 4.  Structure and function of declarative and nondeclarative memory systems.

Authors:  L R Squire; S M Zola
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-03

7.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science.

Authors:  R N Shepard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Intact learning of artificial grammars and intact category learning by patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  P J Reber; L R Squire
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Learning about categories in the absence of memory.

Authors:  L R Squire; B J Knowlton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge.

Authors:  B J Knowlton; L R Squire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  17 in total

1.  Activation in the neural network responsible for categorization and recognition reflects parameter changes.

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; Daniel R Little; Thomas W James
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Implicit learning is order dependent.

Authors:  Randall K Jamieson; John R Vokey; D J K Mewhort
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-10-20

3.  Category learning in Alzheimer's disease and normal cognitive aging depends on initial experience of feature variability.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Phillips; Corey T McMillan; Edward E Smith; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Feedback interference and dissociations of classification: evidence against the multiple-learning-systems hypothesis.

Authors:  Roger D Stanton; Robert M Nosofsky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

5.  The divergent autoencoder (DIVA) model of category learning.

Authors:  Kenneth J Kutrz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

6.  Procedural interference in perceptual classification: implicit learning or cognitive complexity?

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; Roger D Stanton; Safa R Zaki
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-10

7.  A high-distortion enhancement effect in the prototype-learning paradigm: dramatic effects of category learning during test.

Authors:  Safa R Zaki; Robeir M Nosofsky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

8.  Learning concepts when instances never repeat.

Authors:  Donald Homa; Mark Blair; Samuel M McClure; John Medema; Gregory Stone
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-04

9.  Infants' Visual Recognition Memory for a Series of Categorically Related Items.

Authors:  Lisa M Oakes; Kristine A Kovack-Lesh
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2012-03-07

10.  Comparing categorization models.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.