Literature DB >> 30417523

Validation and IMRT/VMAT delivery quality of a preconfigured fast-rotating O-ring linac system.

Robin De Roover1, Wouter Crijns1,2, Kenneth Poels2, Steven Michiels1, An Nulens2, Bianca Vanstraelen2, Saskia Petillion2, Marisol De Brabandere2, Karin Haustermans1,2, Tom Depuydt1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A fast-rotating O-ring dedicated intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)/volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery system, the Halcyon, is delivered by default with a fully preconfigured photon beam model in the treatment planning system (TPS). This work reports on the validation and achieved IMRT/VMAT delivery quality on the system.
METHODS: Acceptance testing followed the vendor's installation product acceptance and was supplemented with mechanical QA. The dosimetric calibration was performed according to the IAEA TRS-398 code-of-practice, delivering 600 cGy/min at 10 cm depth, a 90 cm source-surface distance, and a 10 × 10 cm² field size. The output factors, multileaf collimator (MLC) transmission and dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) were validated by comparing measurements with the modeled values in the TPS. Validation of IMRT/VMAT was conducted following AAPM reports (MPPG 5.a, TG-119). Next, dose measurements were performed for end-to-end (E2E) checks in heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantoms using radiochromic film in multiple planes and using ionization chambers (IC) point measurements. E2E checks were performed for VMAT (cranial, rectum, spine, and head and neck) and IMRT (lung). Additionally, IROC Houston mailed dosimetry audits were performed for the beam calibration and E2E measurements using a thorax phantom (IMRT) and a head and neck phantom (VMAT). Lastly, extensive patient-specific QA was performed for the first patients of each new indication, 26 in total (nrectum = 2, nspine = 5, nlung = 5, nesophagus = 2, nhead and neck = 7, ncranial = 5), treated on the fast-rotating O-ring linac. The patient-specific QA followed the AAPM TG-218 guidelines and comprised of portal dosimetry, ArcCHECK diode array, radiochromic film dosimetry in a MultiCube phantom, and IC point measurements.
RESULTS: The measured output factors showed an agreement <1% for fields ≥3 × 3 cm². Field sizes ≤2 × 2 cm² had a difference of <2%. The measured single-layer MLC transmission was 0.42 ± 0.01% and the measured DLG was 0.27 ± 0.22 mm. The AAPM MPPG 5.a measurements were fully compliant with the guideline criteria. Dose differences larger than 2% were found for the PDD at large depths (>25 cm). TG-119's confidence limits were achieved for the VMAT point dose measurements and for both the IMRT and VMAT radiochromic film measurements. The TG-119 confidence limits were not achieved for IMRT point dose measurements in both the target (5.9%) and the avoidance structure (6.4%). All E2E tests had point differences below 2.3% and gamma agreement scores above 90.6%. The IROC beam calibration audit showed agreement of <1%. The IROC lung IMRT audit and head and neck VMAT audit had results compliant with the IROC Houston's credentialing criteria. All IMRT and VMAT plans selected for patient-specific QA were within the action limits suggested by TG-218.
CONCLUSIONS: The fast-rotating O-ring linac and its preconfigured TPS are compliant with the international commissioning criteria of AAPM MPPG 5.a and AAPM TG-119. E2E measurements on heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantoms were within clinically acceptable tolerances. IROC Houston's audits satisfied the credentialing criteria. This work comprises the first extensive dataset reporting on the preconfigured fast-rotating O-ring linac.
© 2018 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IMRT/VMAT; preconfigured system; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30417523     DOI: 10.1002/mp.13282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  Comprehensive validation of halcyon 2.0 plans and the implementation of patient specific QA with multiple detector platforms.

Authors:  Eric Laugeman; Ana Heermann; Jessica Hilliard; Michael Watts; Marshia Roberson; Robert Morris; Sreekrishna Goddu; Abhishek Sethi; Imran Zoberi; Hyun Kim; Sasa Mutic; Geoffrey Hugo; Bin Cai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Dosimetric Characterization of the Dual Layer MLC System for an O-Ring Linear Accelerator.

Authors:  Michele M Kim; Douglas Bollinger; Chris Kennedy; Wei Zou; Ryan Scheuermann; Boon-Keng Kevin Teo; James M Metz; Lei Dong; Taoran Li
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec

3.  A Method of High-Resolution Radiotherapy Delivery Fluences with a Pair of Fields with Orthogonal Collimator Settings: A Study on Ten Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Stipe Galić; Marin Kovačević; Ivan Lasić; Hrvoje Brkić; Dario Faj
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2020-03-13

4.  Plan quality comparison for cervical carcinoma treated with Halcyon and Trilogy intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Chengqiang Li; Jinhu Chen; Jian Zhu; Guanzhong Gong; Cheng Tao; Zhenjiang Li; Jie Lu; Yong Yin
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  Automated and robust beam data validation of a preconfigured ring gantry linear accelerator using a 1D tank with synchronized beam delivery and couch motions.

Authors:  Nels C Knutson; Matthew C Schmidt; Francisco J Reynoso; Yao Hao; Thomas R Mazur; Eric Laugeman; Geoffrey Hugo; Sasa Mutic; H Harold Li; Wilfred Ngwa; Bin Cai; Erno Sajo
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Unlocking a closed system: dosimetric commissioning of a ring gantry linear accelerator in a multivendor environment.

Authors:  Amarjit Saini; Chris Tichacek; William Johansson; Gage Redler; Geoffrey Zhang; Eduardo G Moros; Muqeem Qayyum; Vladimir Feygelman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Examination of conversion method of dose distribution of lung cancer IMRT using fluence reversible calculation function in O-ring type linac and C-type linac.

Authors:  Toshiya Rachi; Raturi Vijay Parshuram; Yuki Tanaka; Haruki Togo
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2022-04-19

8.  AAPM MEDICAL PHYSICS PRACTICE GUIDELINE 5.b: Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations-Megavoltage photon and electron beams.

Authors:  Mark W Geurts; Dustin J Jacqmin; Lindsay E Jones; Stephen F Kry; Dimitris N Mihailidis; Jared D Ohrt; Timothy Ritter; Jennifer B Smilowitz; Nicholai E Wingreen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.243

9.  Early clinical experience with varian halcyon V2 linear accelerator: Dual-isocenter IMRT planning and delivery with portal dosimetry for gynecological cancer treatments.

Authors:  Hayeon Kim; M Saiful Huq; Ron Lalonde; Christopher J Houser; Sushil Beriwal; Dwight E Heron
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.