Literature DB >> 34689614

A novel artificial intelligence based intensive care unit monitoring system: using physiological waveforms to identify sepsis.

Maximiliano Mollura1, Li-Wei H Lehman2, Roger G Mark2, Riccardo Barbieri1.   

Abstract

A massive amount of multimodal data are continuously collected in the intensive care unit (ICU) along each patient stay, offering a great opportunity for the development of smart monitoring devices based on artificial intelligence (AI). The two main sources of relevant information collected in the ICU are the electronic health records (EHRs) and vital sign waveforms continuously recorded at the bedside. While EHRs are already widely processed by AI algorithms for prompt diagnosis and prognosis, AI-based assessments of the patients' pathophysiological state using waveforms are less developed, and their use is still limited to real-time monitoring for basic visual vital sign feedback at the bedside. This study uses data from the MIMIC-III database (PhysioNet) to propose a novel AI approach in ICU patient monitoring that incorporates features estimated by a closed-loop cardiovascular model, with the specific goal of identifying sepsis within the first hour of admission. Our top benchmark results (AUROC = 0.92, AUPRC = 0.90) suggest that features derived by cardiovascular control models may play a key role in identifying sepsis, by continuous monitoring performed through advanced multivariate modelling of vital sign waveforms. This work lays foundations for a deeper data integration paradigm which will help clinicians in their decision-making processes. This article is part of the theme issue 'Advanced computation in cardiovascular physiology: new challenges and opportunities'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular modelling; continuous monitoring; intensive care unit; machine learning; multimodal data; sepsis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34689614      PMCID: PMC8805602          DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  37 in total

1.  PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals.

Authors:  A L Goldberger; L A Amaral; L Glass; J M Hausdorff; P C Ivanov; R G Mark; J E Mietus; G B Moody; C K Peng; H E Stanley
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy.

Authors:  J S Richman; J R Moorman
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Transfer function analysis of the circulation: unique insights into cardiovascular regulation.

Authors:  J P Saul; R D Berger; P Albrecht; S P Stein; M H Chen; R J Cohen
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1991-10

Review 4.  Applying machine learning to continuously monitored physiological data.

Authors:  Barret Rush; Leo Anthony Celi; David J Stone
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Comparison of SIRS, qSOFA, and NEWS for the early identification of sepsis in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Omar A Usman; Asad A Usman; Michael A Ward
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.469

6.  Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis.

Authors:  Christopher W Seymour; Foster Gesten; Hallie C Prescott; Marcus E Friedrich; Theodore J Iwashyna; Gary S Phillips; Stanley Lemeshow; Tiffany Osborn; Kathleen M Terry; Mitchell M Levy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock: we could go faster.

Authors:  Massimo Zambon; Marcello Ceola; Roberto Almeida-de-Castro; Antonino Gullo; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 3.425

8.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  R Phillip Dellinger; Jean M Carlet; Henry Masur; Herwig Gerlach; Thierry Calandra; Jonathan Cohen; Juan Gea-Banacloche; Didier Keh; John C Marshall; Margaret M Parker; Graham Ramsay; Janice L Zimmerman; Jean-Louis Vincent; M M Levy
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Machine-learning Algorithm to Predict Hypotension Based on High-fidelity Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis.

Authors:  Feras Hatib; Zhongping Jian; Sai Buddi; Christine Lee; Jos Settels; Karen Sibert; Joseph Rinehart; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Development and Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model for the Early Identification of Patients at Risk for Sepsis.

Authors:  Ryan J Delahanty; JoAnn Alvarez; Lisa M Flynn; Robert L Sherwin; Spencer S Jones
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 5.721

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development and Comparative Performance of Physiologic Monitoring Strategies in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  David Kim; Boyang Tom Jin
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.