Wanwan Shen1, Qingwei Wang1, Yang Shen1, Xiao Gao1, Lei Li1, Yang Yan1, Hui Wang2, Yiyun Cheng1,2. 1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Regulatory Biology, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China. 2. South China Advanced Institute for Soft Matter Science and Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Abstract
Cytosolic delivery is the major challenge that limits the clinical translation of siRNA-based therapeutics. Although thousands of polymers have been developed for siRNA delivery, the efficiency-toxicity correlation is unsatisfactory. Here, we report a facile strategy to fabricate core-shell-structured nanoparticles with robust siRNA delivery efficiency. The nanoparticle is prepared by entropy-driven complexation of siRNA with a green tea catechin to yield a negatively charged core, followed by coating low-molecular-weight polymers to form the shell. This supramolecular strategy facilitates the polymers condensing siRNA into uniform nanoparticles. The nanoparticle specifically down-regulates target genes in vitro and in vivo, and efficiently attenuates chronic intestinal inflammation in an inflammatory bowel disease model. Notably, the highly efficient nanoparticles are applicable for various polymers with different topologies and chemical compositions, providing a versatile technique to break down the efficiency-toxicity correlation of cationic polymers. The proposed strategy in this study permits the development of a promising platform for polymer-mediated siRNA delivery.
Cytosolic delivery is the major challenge that limits the clinical translation of siRNA-based therapeutics. Although thousands of polymers have been developed for siRNA delivery, the efficiency-toxicity correlation is unsatisfactory. Here, we report a facile strategy to fabricate core-shell-structured nanoparticles with robust siRNA delivery efficiency. The nanoparticle is prepared by entropy-driven complexation of siRNA with a green teacatechin to yield a negatively charged core, followed by coating low-molecular-weight polymers to form the shell. This supramolecular strategy facilitates the polymers condensing siRNA into uniform nanoparticles. The nanoparticle specifically down-regulates target genes in vitro and in vivo, and efficiently attenuates chronic intestinal inflammation in an inflammatory bowel disease model. Notably, the highly efficient nanoparticles are applicable for various polymers with different topologies and chemical compositions, providing a versatile technique to break down the efficiency-toxicity correlation of cationic polymers. The proposed strategy in this study permits the development of a promising platform for polymer-mediated siRNA delivery.
Small interfering
RNAs (siRNAs)
have great potential to specifically down-regulate target genes for
the treatment of various diseases.[1−3] However, siRNAs are relatively
large, negatively charged, and hydrophilic molecules that are susceptible
to nuclease degradation.[4,5] These properties restrict
their penetration across cell membrane and decrease the durability
of therapeutic effects.[6] An effective and
safe delivery system is crucial for clinical translation of siRNA-based
therapeutics.[4,7,8] Even
with the success of Patisiran, a lipid-formulated siRNA nanoparticle,
in a phase 3 trial, there is continuing interest in the development
of efficient and safe siRNA delivery systems.[9]To date, cationic polymers,[10−12] lipid nanoparticles,[13−15] proteins and peptides,[16,17] inorganic nanoparticles,[18,19] ligand-siRNA conjugates,[20,21] and RNA assemblies[22,23] have been designed for RNAi. Among them, cationic polymers were
one of the most widely adopted materials.[24−26] They form polyplexes
with siRNA via ionic interactions. Considering the rigid and short
double-helical structures, it is hard to condense siRNAs, and the
polyplex formation lacks cooperativity.[27] The loose siRNA polyplexes are easily destabilized by proteoglycans
abundant outside the cells.[25,28] To strengthen the polyplex
stability, polymers with high charge densities and molecular weights
were used.[29−32] Though siRNA binding affinity and transfection efficiency were improved
in these efforts, the efficiency–toxicity correlation for these
polymers has been unsatisfactory.[33] To
break down the correlation, low-molecular-weight polycations with
minimal toxicity were assembled into nanostructures, or anchored to
biocompatible scaffolds to generate hybrid nanostructures.[34−39] In an alternative strategy, siRNAs were prefabricated into nanostructures
before complexation with polymers to increase the binding affinity,
i.e., concatemerization of siRNAs with thiol groups or commentary
overhangs into “genelike” chains,[27,40−42] or hybridization of siRNAs to well-defined oligonucleotide
nanoparticles by DNA origami or self-assembly.[23,43−45] Despite these impressive efforts, the current approaches
for siRNA delivery still have some limitations such as the need of
siRNA chemical modification, sophisticated material syntheses, safety
concerns of synthetic polymers, and limited RNA interfering (RNAi)
efficiency.[3,46]Here, we reported a general
and robust strategy to fabricate nanoparticles
for siRNA delivery. The nanoparticle consists of a natural or synthetic
low-molecular-weight polymer, a natural polyphenol (−)-epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate (EGCG), and siRNAs. EGCG, a major ingredient of
green tea, has strong binding affinity with DNA, RNA, and proteins
via hydrogen-bond interactions.[47,48] The nanoparticles were
fabricated by precomplexation siRNA with EGCG to yield a negatively
charged core, followed by coating a low-molecular-weight cationic
polymer to form the shell. This supramolecular strategy facilitates
low-molecular-weight polymers “condensing” siRNA into
uniform nanoparticles. The generated nanoparticles successfully achieved
high RNAi efficiency with minimal toxicity in vitro and in vivo. Considering the essential role of
green teacatechin in efficient and nontoxic RNAi, the nanoparticle
was termed “green” nanoparticles (GNPs).To confirm
the efficiency–toxicity correlation of cationic
polymers in siRNA delivery, we tested six types of intact polymers
with different molecular weights including poly-l-lysine
(PLL, 4224 and 25 000 Da), linear polyethylenimine (LPEI, 2500
and 25 000 Da), dendri-graft-l-lysine
(DGL, 6800 and 128 000 Da), branched polyethylenimine (BPEI,
1800 and 25 000 Da), poly(propylene imine) dendrimer (PPI,
692 and 7618 Da), and polyamidoamine dendrimer (PAMAM, 1430 and 28 826
Da). Among the polymers, PLL and LPEI belong to linear polymers, and
DGL and BPEI are branched polymers, while PPI and PAMAM are hyperbranched
polymers. As shown in Figure A and Figure S1, all the low-molecular-weight
polymers are minimally toxic, but nonefficient at the same time (red
symbols), while high-molecular-weight ones show considerable RNAi
efficiency, however, accompanied by serious cytotoxicity (blue symbols).
To break down this correlation, we fabricate GNPs using the six representative
polymers with relatively low molecular weight, which achieving both
high efficiency and biocompatibility (green symbols).
Figure 1
(A) The transfection
efficiency–toxicity correlation of
cationic polymers in siRNA delivery. Increasing the molecular weight
(MW) of polymers improves transfection efficiency, but also induces
serious cytotoxicity. The fabricated GNPs by a supramolecular strategy
ensure both high efficiency and minimal toxicity. (B) Schematic illustration
of GNP formulation and the proposed gene silencing mechanism.
(A) The transfection
efficiency–toxicity correlation of
cationic polymers in siRNA delivery. Increasing the molecular weight
(MW) of polymers improves transfection efficiency, but also induces
serious cytotoxicity. The fabricated GNPs by a supramolecular strategy
ensure both high efficiency and minimal toxicity. (B) Schematic illustration
of GNP formulation and the proposed gene silencing mechanism.The key problem of low-molecular-weight
polymers in siRNA delivery
is the difficulty in polyplex formation.[14] Here, a natural polyphenolEGCG was preincubated with siRNA before
complexation with polymer (Figure B). The polyphenolic structure of EGCG enables strongly
affinity to siRNA via cooperative hydrogen-bond and hydrophobic interactions.[47−49] The interactions of EGCG with siRNA were confirmed by ethidium bromide
(EB) competitive binding, RNase degradation, and transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) experiments. EB intercalates into the grooves of
siRNA, yielding a red fluorescent complex. The addition of EGCG into
the complex significantly decreases the fluorescence intensity (Figure A), suggesting competitive
binding of siRNA with EGCG. Similarly, the mixing of EGCG with a fluorescent-labeled
siRNA showed partially quenched fluorescence due to EGCG-driven aggregation
of siRNA (Figure S2). The EGCG/siRNA complex
efficiently prevents the degradation of siRNA by RNase (Figure B). The formed complex was
characterized to be negatively charged nanoparticles (−8.41
mV, Figure C and Figure S3). For an investigation into which type
of interaction dominates the complexation, the interaction between
EGCG and siRNA was investigated by isothermal titration calorimetry
(ITC). As shown in Figure D, the binding of EGCG with siRNA is an endothermic reaction.
The interaction is entropy-driven and occurs with an increase of entropy.
These results suggest the successful complexation of siRNA by EGCG,
and the interaction is likely driven by hydrophobic and hydrogen-bond
interactions.[50]
Figure 2
The interactions between
EGCG and siRNA. (A) EB competitive binding
assay. The binding of EGCG to siRNA causes the exclusion of EB from
siRNA and the quenching of EB fluorescence. (B) Stability of EGCG/siRNA
complexes against RNase (0–50 μg/mL). (C) ζ potential
and TEM image of EGCG/siRNA complex prepared at EGCG-to-siRNA weight
ratio of 5:1. The scale bar is 200 nm. (D) ITC data for the titration
of EGCG into siRNA in 10 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.0). The dilution heat
of EGCG was subtracted from released heat.
The interactions between
EGCG and siRNA. (A) EB competitive binding
assay. The binding of EGCG to siRNA causes the exclusion of EB from
siRNA and the quenching of EB fluorescence. (B) Stability of EGCG/siRNA
complexes against RNase (0–50 μg/mL). (C) ζ potential
and TEM image of EGCG/siRNA complex prepared at EGCG-to-siRNA weight
ratio of 5:1. The scale bar is 200 nm. (D) ITC data for the titration
of EGCG into siRNA in 10 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.0). The dilution heat
of EGCG was subtracted from released heat.The EGCG/siRNA complex was further coated with cationic polymers
via electrostatic interactions. EGCG significantly improves the siRNA
complexation capability of low-molecular-weight polymers. As shown
in Figure A, PLL (4224
Da) alone fails to condense siRNA at polymer-to-siRNA weight ratios
up to 100:1. In the presence of EGCG, however, it successfully forms
nanoparticles within 200 nm even at a weight ratio of 5:1. The yielding
nanoparticles are relatively stable in different solutions such as
150 mM NaCl and cell culture medium (Figure S4). The benefit of EGCG in facilitating siRNA condensation is further
confirmed by dynamic light scattering (DLS), TEM, and EB competitive
binding analysis (Figure B, Figures S5 and S6). The successful
coating of low-molecular-weight polymers on the EGCG/siRNA complex
is confirmed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis.
EGCG/siRNA complex labeled with carboxyfluorescein shows strong FRET
signal after the addition of rhodamine-labeled PLL (PLL-Rho), while
PLL and siRNA display a weak FRET signal in the absence of EGCG (Figure E). The structure
of the formed GNPs consisting of PLL, EGCG, and siRNA is analyzed
by TEM and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) element mapping.
As shown in Figure F and Figure S9, the phosphorus (P, represents
siRNA) generally locates in the interior of GNPs, while the nitrogen
(N) and oxygen (O) distribute throughout the nanoparticle. This result
suggests that the ternary complex is a core–shell-structured
nanoparticle. Such a supramolecular strategy in GNPs fabrication is
applicable for all the six types of low-molecular-weight polymers
(Figure B–D, Figures S6–S8).
Figure 3
The characterization
of GNPs. (A) Sizes of PLL/siRNA polyplexes
without and with EGCG at different polymer-to-siRNA weight ratios.
DLS and TEM images of GNPs consisting of PLL (B), DGL (C), and PPI
(D). The size distribution of polyplexes without EGCG was shown for
comparison. Scale bar is 200 nm. (E) Fluorescence spectra of siRNA-FAM,
PLL/siRNA-FAM, and GNPs consisting of siRNA-FAM, EGCG, and PLL. PLL
was labeled with rhodamine. (F) High-angle annular dark-field TEM
(HAADF-TEM) image and corresponding element line-scan of a single
GNP consisting of siRNA, EGCG, and PLL. The red scale bar is 100 nm.
The EGCG-to-siRNA weight ratios were 5:1 for PLL, and 10:1 for DGL
and PPI. The PLL-to-EGCG weight ratio in parts B, E, and F was 1:1.
For DGL (C) and PPI (D), the polymer-to-EGCG weight ratio was 1:4.
The characterization
of GNPs. (A) Sizes of PLL/siRNA polyplexes
without and with EGCG at different polymer-to-siRNA weight ratios.
DLS and TEM images of GNPs consisting of PLL (B), DGL (C), and PPI
(D). The size distribution of polyplexes without EGCG was shown for
comparison. Scale bar is 200 nm. (E) Fluorescence spectra of siRNA-FAM,
PLL/siRNA-FAM, and GNPs consisting of siRNA-FAM, EGCG, and PLL. PLL
was labeled with rhodamine. (F) High-angle annular dark-field TEM
(HAADF-TEM) image and corresponding element line-scan of a single
GNP consisting of siRNA, EGCG, and PLL. The red scale bar is 100 nm.
The EGCG-to-siRNA weight ratios were 5:1 for PLL, and 10:1 for DGL
and PPI. The PLL-to-EGCG weight ratio in parts B, E, and F was 1:1.
For DGL (C) and PPI (D), the polymer-to-EGCG weight ratio was 1:4.We then tested RNAi efficiency
of GNPs on HeLa cells stably expressing
firefly luciferase (HeLa-Luc). As shown in Figure , all the low-molecular-weight polymers show
extremely low gene silencing efficiency (<5%) in the absence of
EGCG, while the GNPs exhibit high RNAi efficiencies (∼80%).
In addition, parallel experiments of GNPs containing scrambled siRNA
show negative gene silencing (Figure S10), suggesting high specificity for GNPs-mediated RNAi. The chosen
polymers in this study include two linear polymers, two branched polymers,
and two hyperbranched polymers. Except for a topology difference,
the investigated polymers consist of various chemical components.
The results suggest that GNPs provide a general and robust method
for siRNA delivery.
Figure 4
RNAi efficiency of GNPs consisting of polymers with different
topological
structures and chemical components (green bars) on HeLa-Luc cells
for 24 h. The polyplexes without EGCG (red bars) were shown for comparison.
The gray bar denotes the EGCG/siRNA complex. The EGCG-to-siRNA weight
ratios were 5:1 for PLL and LPEI, and 10:1 for DGL, BPEI, PPI, PAMAM,
and EGCG/siRNA complex, respectively. The polymer-to-EGCG weight ratio
in the GNPs was 1:1. The siRNA concentration was 50 nM. ***p < 0.001 analyzed by Student’s t test.
RNAi efficiency of GNPs consisting of polymers with different
topological
structures and chemical components (green bars) on HeLa-Luc cells
for 24 h. The polyplexes without EGCG (red bars) were shown for comparison.
The gray bar denotes the EGCG/siRNA complex. The EGCG-to-siRNA weight
ratios were 5:1 for PLL and LPEI, and 10:1 for DGL, BPEI, PPI, PAMAM,
and EGCG/siRNA complex, respectively. The polymer-to-EGCG weight ratio
in the GNPs was 1:1. The siRNA concentration was 50 nM. ***p < 0.001 analyzed by Student’s t test.We further investigated the endocytic
pathways for GNPs using specific
inhibitors. The results show that the endocytosis of GNPs is mediated
by a lipid-raft-dependent pathway (Figure S11). The uptake of GNPs is much more efficient than polyplexes without
EGCG (Figure S12). The formulated siRNAs
are generally not colocalized with endolysosomes stained by LysoTracker
red (Figure S13), and could be released
into cytosol after 12 h (Figure S14). These
results suggest that GNPs are beneficial for efficient endocytosis
and intracellular siRNA release. GNPs also showed high gene silencing
efficacy when incubated in cell culture medium or 150 mM salt for
24 h and distilled water for up to 7 days (Figure S15). Decreasing the siRNA dose in GNPs only slightly reduces
the efficiency (Figure S16A). Even at a
dose of 0.1 nM, the GNPs still show gene knockdown efficiency above
60%. The GNPs also exhibit high efficacies (∼80%, 50 nM siRNA)
when silencing the glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)
gene in PC9 cells, the matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9) gene in U87
cells, and the prolyl hydroxylase 2 (PHD2) gene in primary murine
small intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) (Figure S16B–E). GNPs are even efficient in the delivery of
siRNA into hard-to-transfect cells such as Raw264.7 (Figure S17). As described before, low-molecular-weight polymers
are generally nontoxic. The used EGCG in the GNPs is a major constituent
of green teacatechins with beneficial properties for various diseases.
Daily administration of EGCG at a dose of 300–600 mg per person
is proven to be safe in clinical studies.[51] The third component in the GNPs, siRNA, is also an FDA-approved
biomolecule.[6] Therefore, all the low-molecular-weight
polymers and their GNPs cause negligible toxicity at optimal transfection
concentrations (Figure S16F), and the addition
of EGCG does not bring additional cytotoxicity. Among the investigated
polymers, ε-PLL, a natural polymer produced by Streptomyces
albus, is especially preferred because it has been used as
food additives. The promising results on high efficiency and biocompatibility
motivate us to investigate the efficiency of GNPs in vivo.We further evaluated the therapeutic efficiency of GNPs in
a dextran
sulfate sodium (DSS) induced intestinal injury model, which is
an inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract.[52] It is reported that prolyl hydroxylase inhibition
has beneficial effects in TNF-α induced intestinal epithelial
damage by stabilizing hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α).[53] Here, one of the prolyl hydroxylases, PHD2,
is chosen as the therapeutic target (Figure A). Intrarectal administration of GNPs loaded
with siRNA targeting PHD2 to mice with DSS-induced intestinal injury
led to a significant decrease of PHD2 gene in the colonic biopsies
(Figure B). The down-regulated
PHD2 contributes to HIF-1α stabilization, which further down-regulates
the TNF-α gene in the intestinal tissues (Figure C). Western blotting results further confirm
the decreases in PHD2 and TNF-α proteins (Figure D), and reduced HIF-1α protein degradation
(Figure S18). Immunohistochemistry analysis
also shows a much decreased TNF-α level in the GNP group compared
to the control groups (PBS and GNPs containing scrambled siRNA, Sc-GNPs, Figure E). Administration
of GNPs to mice with DSS-induced intestinal injury shows an obvious
amelioration of intestinal symptoms, i.e., significantly lower disease
activity score (Figure A and Figure S19), less loss of body weight
(Figure B), less shortening
of the colon (Figure C), and lower levels of inflammatory cells such as white blood cells
(Figure D) and neutrophils
(Figure E) compared
to the control groups. Damage in the intestinal epithelial barrier
function is a characteristic feature of intestinal injury. As shown
in Figure F, GNP-treated
mice with DSS-induced intestinal injury show impaired intestinal epithelial
structures in histological sections similar to that of healthy mice.
The hematological parameters of mice administered with GNPs are similar
to those of healthy mice without any treatment (Figure S20). For practical treatment of DSS-induced intestinal
injury in the future, the GNPs can be encapsulated within an enteric
capsule and administered orally to avoid their disassembly in gastric
acid. Considering the beneficial properties of EGCG in antioxidant,
anti-inflammation, antibacterial, and anticancer effects,[48] the GNPs can be used for the local treatment
of various diseases (e.g., corneoiritis, diabetic wound healing, dermatosis,
and local bacterial infections) when combining the therapeutic effect
of EGCG and the promising efficiency of GNPs.
Figure 5
Gene knockdown efficiency
of GNPs in vivo. (A)
A DSS-induced intestinal injury model was established to evaluate
the gene knockdown efficiency of GNPs consisting of PLL, EGCG, and
siPHD2. The knockdown of PHD2 stabilizes HIF-1α, and down-regulates
TNF-α in the colon tissues, which reduces TNF-α-caused
intestinal epithelial damage. The mice with DSS-induced intestinal
injury were treated with PBS, GNPs containing siPHD2, or scrambled
GNPs containing siNC (Sc-GNPs). The normal mice were not treated during
the therapeutic period. PHD2 (B) and TNF-α (C) mRNA levels in
the colon tissues measured by quantitative PCR after the treatments.
(D) Relative protein levels of PHD2 and TNF-α in the colon tissues
analyzed by Western blot. (E) TNF-α in the colon tissues analyzed
by immunohistochemistry (scale bar, 100 μm). The siRNA dose
was 0.75 mg/kg mice, and the weight ratios of EGCG-to-siRNA and EGCG-to-PLL
were 5:1 and 1:1, respectively. NS p > 0.05, *p < 0.05, and **p < 0.01 analyzed
by Student’s t test.
Figure 6
Therapeutic efficiency of GNPs in the treatment of DSS-induced
intestinal injury. Disease activity index (A), body weight (B), and
colon length (C) of mice with DSS-induced intestinal injury after
the treatments. Relative white blood cells (WBC, D) and neutrophils
(NEUT, E) in the blood of treated mice. (F) Histological staining
of colon tissues in mice after the treatments (scale bar, 100 μm).
NS p > 0.05, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 analyzed
by Student’s t test.
Gene knockdown efficiency
of GNPs in vivo. (A)
A DSS-induced intestinal injury model was established to evaluate
the gene knockdown efficiency of GNPs consisting of PLL, EGCG, and
siPHD2. The knockdown of PHD2 stabilizes HIF-1α, and down-regulates
TNF-α in the colon tissues, which reduces TNF-α-caused
intestinal epithelial damage. The mice with DSS-induced intestinal
injury were treated with PBS, GNPs containing siPHD2, or scrambled
GNPs containing siNC (Sc-GNPs). The normal mice were not treated during
the therapeutic period. PHD2 (B) and TNF-α (C) mRNA levels in
the colon tissues measured by quantitative PCR after the treatments.
(D) Relative protein levels of PHD2 and TNF-α in the colon tissues
analyzed by Western blot. (E) TNF-α in the colon tissues analyzed
by immunohistochemistry (scale bar, 100 μm). The siRNA dose
was 0.75 mg/kg mice, and the weight ratios of EGCG-to-siRNA and EGCG-to-PLL
were 5:1 and 1:1, respectively. NS p > 0.05, *p < 0.05, and **p < 0.01 analyzed
by Student’s t test.Therapeutic efficiency of GNPs in the treatment of DSS-induced
intestinal injury. Disease activity index (A), body weight (B), and
colon length (C) of mice with DSS-induced intestinal injury after
the treatments. Relative white blood cells (WBC, D) and neutrophils
(NEUT, E) in the blood of treated mice. (F) Histological staining
of colon tissues in mice after the treatments (scale bar, 100 μm).
NS p > 0.05, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 analyzed
by Student’s t test.In summary, EGCG facilitates siRNA condensation by low-molecular-weight
polymers, and the yielding GNPs show robust efficiency on gene silencing.
In addition, GNPs containing a therapeutic siRNA efficiently silenced
the target genes in vivo, and ameliorated intestinal
inflammation in a DSS-induced intestinal injury model. The biocompatible
components such as EGCG, siRNA, and PLL in GNPs ensure minimal toxicity
on the transfected cells. Considering the chemical similarity of siRNA
with microRNAs, antisense oligodeoxynucleotides, DNAzymes, and peptide
nucleic acids, the proposed supramolecular strategy for the fabrication
of GNPs should be generally applicable to a wide variety of nucleic
acids and permits the development of a general and robust platform
for gene delivery.
Authors: James E Dahlman; Carmen Barnes; Omar Khan; Aude Thiriot; Siddharth Jhunjunwala; Taylor E Shaw; Yiping Xing; Hendrik B Sager; Gaurav Sahay; Lauren Speciner; Andrew Bader; Roman L Bogorad; Hao Yin; Tim Racie; Yizhou Dong; Shan Jiang; Danielle Seedorf; Apeksha Dave; Kamaljeet S Sandu; Matthew J Webber; Tatiana Novobrantseva; Vera M Ruda; Abigail K R Lytton-Jean; Christopher G Levins; Brian Kalish; Dayna K Mudge; Mario Perez; Ludmila Abezgauz; Partha Dutta; Lynelle Smith; Klaus Charisse; Mark W Kieran; Kevin Fitzgerald; Matthias Nahrendorf; Dganit Danino; Rubin M Tuder; Ulrich H von Andrian; Akin Akinc; Avi Schroeder; Dipak Panigrahy; Victor Kotelianski; Robert Langer; Daniel G Anderson Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2014-05-11 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Simone Alidori; Nima Akhavein; Daniel L J Thorek; Katja Behling; Yevgeniy Romin; Dawn Queen; Bradley J Beattie; Katia Manova-Todorova; Magnus Bergkvist; David A Scheinberg; Michael R McDevitt Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2016-03-23 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Emily P Thi; Chad E Mire; Amy C H Lee; Joan B Geisbert; Joy Z Zhou; Krystle N Agans; Nicholas M Snead; Daniel J Deer; Trisha R Barnard; Karla A Fenton; Ian MacLachlan; Thomas W Geisbert Journal: Nature Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jeremy Lamothe; Sandhya Khurana; Sujeenthar Tharmalingam; Chad Williamson; Collin J Byrne; Simon J Lees; Neelam Khaper; Aseem Kumar; T C Tai Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) Date: 2021-03-29