Literature DB >> 30410525

Usefulness of Cone Beam Intra-Arterial CTA for Evaluation of Flow Diverters: A Practical Approach for Daily Use.

Dennys Reyes1, Victor Becerra1, Indiana Alcala1, Italo Linfante1, Guilherme Dabus1.   

Abstract

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), initially used for evaluation of intraprocedural complications such as hemorrhage, has evolved to provide details of implanted devices such as flow diverters. The study aim is to present our experience in using CBCT with intra-arterial injection and provide a step-by-step approach for postprocessing in a practical protocol for daily use. IRB approval was obtained, and the neurointerventional database was retrospectively reviewed from July 2012 to June 2017. Patients who underwent cone beam intra-arterial CT angiography for evaluation of implanted flow diverter devices were reviewed. Patient demographics, aneurysm location (internal carotid artery [ICA]-cavernous, ICA-paraclinoid, and ICA-distal; middle cerebral artery [MCA], anterior cerebral artery [ACA]-acom, ACA-pericallosal, vertebral artery [VA]), type (saccular, dissecting fusiform, or blister) and size, device, injection technique (contrast dilution, rate, and volume), and reconstruction protocol were recorded. Acquired images were postprocessed using a Philips Xtravision workstation. Eighty patients (63 women and 17 men) met the inclusion criteria of our study. Age range was 25-80 years old. Treated aneurysms were located in the ICA-paraclinoid in 48 cases (60%), ICA-distal in 12 cases, ICA-cavernous in 8 cases, MCA in 4 cases, VA in 4 cases, ACA-acom in 2 cases, ACA-pericallosal in 2 cases; 69 were saccular, 8 fusiform, and 3 ruptured blister aneurysms. There were 52 small, 20 large, and 8 giant aneurysms. Pipeline (Medtronic, MN, USA) was the predominant device used in 77 procedures. Two injection techniques were used: 2.5 mL/s for a total volume of 55 mL with a 2-s imaging delay or 3 mL/s for a total volume of 70 mL with a 3-s imaging delay; contrast (Ioxilan 300 mgI/mL) dilution was 10-20% in all cases. The device's landing zones, conformability, presence of deformities, and wall apposition were successfully visualized in all cases. Metal artifact reduction program was applied in 9 coiled aneurysms, and this was satisfactory as well.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral aneurysm; Cone beam computed tomography; Flow diverter

Year:  2018        PMID: 30410525      PMCID: PMC6216775          DOI: 10.1159/000490577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neurol        ISSN: 1664-5545


  11 in total

1.  Cone beam computed tomography in the neurointerventional room: beyond vessels.

Authors:  Sameer A Ansari; Salah G Aoun; Bernard R Bendok
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Contrast-enhanced angiographic cone-beam CT of cerebrovascular stents: experimental optimization and clinical application.

Authors:  N V Patel; M J Gounis; A K Wakhloo; N Noordhoek; J Blijd; D Babic; D Takhtani; S-K Lee; A Norbash
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents.

Authors:  C J O'kelly; T Krings; D Fiorella; T R Marotta
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  Analysis of closed-cell intracranial stent characteristics using cone-beam computed tomography with contrast material.

Authors:  Wataro Tsuruta; Yuji Matsumaru; Yusuke Hamada; Mikito Hayakawa; Yuki Kamiya
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Contrast-enhanced angiographic cone-beam computed tomography without pre-diluted contrast medium.

Authors:  K I Jo; S R Kim; J H Choi; K H Kim; P Jeon
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  Tibor Becske; David F Kallmes; Isil Saatci; Cameron G McDougall; István Szikora; Giuseppe Lanzino; Christopher J Moran; Henry H Woo; Demetrius K Lopes; Aaron L Berez; Daniel J Cher; Adnan H Siddiqui; Elad I Levy; Felipe C Albuquerque; David J Fiorella; Zsolt Berentei; Miklós Marosfoi; Saruhan H Cekirge; Peter K Nelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Assessment of angiographic outcomes after flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a new grading schema.

Authors:  Mudassar Kamran; Julia Yarnold; Iris Q Grunwald; James V Byrne
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Utility of VasoCT in the treatment of intracranial aneurysm with flow-diverter stents.

Authors:  Osman Kizilkilic; Naci Kocer; George Emmanuel Metaxas; Drazenko Babic; Robert Homan; Civan Islak
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Flow diversion of large internal carotid artery aneurysms with the surpass device: impressions and technical nuance from the initial North American experience.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Colby; Li-Mei Lin; Justin M Caplan; Bowen Jiang; Barbara Michniewicz; Judy Huang; Rafael J Tamargo; Alexander L Coon
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 5.836

10.  High-resolution 3D X-ray imaging of intracranial nitinol stents.

Authors:  Rudolph M Snoeren; Michael Söderman; Johannes N Kroon; Ruben B Roijers; Peter H N de With; Drazenko Babic
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 2.804

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cone-beam CT angiography to assess the microvascular anatomy of intracranial arterial dissections.

Authors:  Francesco Diana; Eytan Raz; Francesco Biraschi; Daniele G Romano; Giada Toccaceli; Maksim Shapiro; Simone Peschillo
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-09-30

2.  When Two Is Better than One : The Buddy-wire Technique in Flow-diversion Procedures.

Authors:  Tomas Dobrocky; Hubert Lee; Patrick Nicholson; Ronit Agid; Jeremy Lynch; Saravana Kumar Swaminathan; Timo Krings; Ivan Radovanovic; Vitor Mendes Pereira
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.156

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.