Christopher L Axelrod1,2, Ciarán E Fealy1, Anny Mulya1, John P Kirwan1,2. 1. Department of Pathobiology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. 2. Integrated Physiology and Molecular Medicine Laboratory, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Abstract
AIMS: Mitochondria exist as a morphologically plastic network driven by cellular bioenergetic demand. Induction of fusion and fission machinery allows the organelle to regulate quality control and substrate flux. Physiological stressors promote fragmentation of the mitochondrial network, a process implicated in the onset of metabolic disease, including type 2 diabetes and obesity. It is well-known that exercise training improves skeletal muscle mitochondrial volume, number, and density. However, the effect of exercise training on muscle mitochondrial dynamics remains unclear. METHODS: Ten sedentary adults (65.8 ± 4.6 years; 34.3 ± 2.4 kg/m2 ) underwent 12 weeks of supervised aerobic exercise training (5 day/wk, 85% of HRMAX ). Body composition, cardio-metabolic testing, hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamps, and skeletal muscle biopsies were performed before and after training. MFN1, MFN2, OPA1, OMA1, FIS1, Parkin, PGC-1α, and HSC70 protein expression was assessed via Western blot. RESULTS: Exercise training led to improvements in insulin sensitivity, aerobic capacity, and fat oxidation (all P < 0.01), as well as reductions in body weight, BMI, fat mass and fasting glucose (all P < 0.001). When normalized for changes in mitochondrial content, exercise reduced skeletal muscle FIS1 and Parkin (P < 0.05), while having no significant effect on MFN1, MFN2, OPA1, and OMA1 expression. Exercise also improved the ratio of fusion to fission proteins (P < 0.05), which positively correlated with improvements in glucose disposal (r2 = 0.59, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Exercise training alters the expression of mitochondrial fusion and fission proteins, promoting a more fused, tubular network. These changes may contribute to the improvements in insulin sensitivity and substrate utilization that are observed after exercise training.
AIMS: Mitochondria exist as a morphologically plastic network driven by cellular bioenergetic demand. Induction of fusion and fission machinery allows the organelle to regulate quality control and substrate flux. Physiological stressors promote fragmentation of the mitochondrial network, a process implicated in the onset of metabolic disease, including type 2 diabetes and obesity. It is well-known that exercise training improves skeletal muscle mitochondrial volume, number, and density. However, the effect of exercise training on muscle mitochondrial dynamics remains unclear. METHODS: Ten sedentary adults (65.8 ± 4.6 years; 34.3 ± 2.4 kg/m2 ) underwent 12 weeks of supervised aerobic exercise training (5 day/wk, 85% of HRMAX ). Body composition, cardio-metabolic testing, hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamps, and skeletal muscle biopsies were performed before and after training. MFN1, MFN2, OPA1, OMA1, FIS1, Parkin, PGC-1α, and HSC70 protein expression was assessed via Western blot. RESULTS: Exercise training led to improvements in insulin sensitivity, aerobic capacity, and fat oxidation (all P < 0.01), as well as reductions in body weight, BMI, fat mass and fasting glucose (all P < 0.001). When normalized for changes in mitochondrial content, exercise reduced skeletal muscle FIS1 and Parkin (P < 0.05), while having no significant effect on MFN1, MFN2, OPA1, and OMA1 expression. Exercise also improved the ratio of fusion to fission proteins (P < 0.05), which positively correlated with improvements in glucose disposal (r2 = 0.59, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Exercise training alters the expression of mitochondrial fusion and fission proteins, promoting a more fused, tubular network. These changes may contribute to the improvements in insulin sensitivity and substrate utilization that are observed after exercise training.
Authors: Christopher G R Perry; James Lally; Graham P Holloway; George J F Heigenhauser; Arend Bonen; Lawrence L Spriet Journal: J Physiol Date: 2010-10-04 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Adeel Safdar; Jonathan P Little; Andrew J Stokl; Bart P Hettinga; Mahmood Akhtar; Mark A Tarnopolsky Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-01-18 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Niels Ortenblad; Martin Mogensen; Ingrid Petersen; Kurt Højlund; Klaus Levin; Kent Sahlin; Henning Beck-Nielsen; Michael Gaster Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2005-04-22
Authors: Kitt Falk Petersen; Douglas Befroy; Sylvie Dufour; James Dziura; Charlotte Ariyan; Douglas L Rothman; Loretta DiPietro; Gary W Cline; Gerald I Shulman Journal: Science Date: 2003-05-16 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Steen Larsen; Joachim Nielsen; Christina Neigaard Hansen; Lars Bo Nielsen; Flemming Wibrand; Nis Stride; Henrik Daa Schroder; Robert Boushel; Jørn Wulff Helge; Flemming Dela; Martin Hey-Mogensen Journal: J Physiol Date: 2012-05-14 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Hsiuchen Chen; Scott A Detmer; Andrew J Ewald; Erik E Griffin; Scott E Fraser; David C Chan Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2003-01-13 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Alexis Diaz-Vegas; Pablo Sanchez-Aguilera; James R Krycer; Pablo E Morales; Matías Monsalves-Alvarez; Mariana Cifuentes; Beverly A Rothermel; Sergio Lavandero Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Wagner S Dantas; Hamilton Roschel; Igor H Murai; Saulo Gil; Gangarao Davuluri; Christopher L Axelrod; Sujoy Ghosh; Susan S Newman; Hui Zhang; Samuel K Shinjo; Willian das Neves; Carlos Merege-Filho; Walcy R Teodoro; Vera L Capelozzi; Rosa Maria Pereira; Fabiana B Benatti; Ana L de Sá-Pinto; Roberto de Cleva; Marco A Santo; John P Kirwan; Bruno Gualano Journal: Diabetes Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Kaleen M Lavin; Paul M Coen; Liliana C Baptista; Margaret B Bell; Devin Drummer; Sara A Harper; Manoel E Lixandrão; Jeremy S McAdam; Samia M O'Bryan; Sofhia Ramos; Lisa M Roberts; Rick B Vega; Bret H Goodpaster; Marcas M Bamman; Thomas W Buford Journal: Compr Physiol Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 8.915
Authors: Palak Ahuja; Chun Fai Ng; Brian Pak Shing Pang; Wing Suen Chan; Margaret Chui Ling Tse; Xinyi Bi; Hiu-Lam Rachel Kwan; Daniel Brobst; Oana Herlea-Pana; Xiuying Yang; Guanhua Du; Suchaorn Saengnipanthkul; Hye Lim Noh; Baowei Jiao; Jason K Kim; Chi Wai Lee; Keqiang Ye; Chi Bun Chan Journal: Autophagy Date: 2021-10-25 Impact factor: 13.391
Authors: Carlos Henríquez-Olguín; Susanna Boronat; Claudio Cabello-Verrugio; Enrique Jaimovich; Elena Hidalgo; Thomas E Jensen Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: John P Kirwan; Christopher L Axelrod; Emily L Kullman; Steven K Malin; Wagner S Dantas; Kathryn Pergola; Juan Pablo Del Rincon; Stacy A Brethauer; Sangeeta R Kashyap; Philip R Schauer Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2021-09-27 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Christopher L Axelrod; Ciaran E Fealy; Melissa L Erickson; Gangarao Davuluri; Hisashi Fujioka; Wagner S Dantas; Emily Huang; Kathryn Pergola; Jacob T Mey; William T King; Anny Mulya; Daniel Hsia; Bartolome Burguera; Bernard Tandler; Charles L Hoppel; John P Kirwan Journal: Metabolism Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 13.934
Authors: Christopher L Axelrod; William T King; Gangarao Davuluri; Robert C Noland; Jacob Hall; Michaela Hull; Wagner S Dantas; Elizabeth Rm Zunica; Stephanie J Alexopoulos; Kyle L Hoehn; Ingeborg Langohr; Krisztian Stadler; Haylee Doyle; Eva Schmidt; Stephan Nieuwoudt; Kelly Fitzgerald; Kathryn Pergola; Hisashi Fujioka; Jacob T Mey; Ciaran Fealy; Anny Mulya; Robbie Beyl; Charles L Hoppel; John P Kirwan Journal: EMBO Mol Med Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 12.137