Literature DB >> 35578962

State of Knowledge on Molecular Adaptations to Exercise in Humans: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions.

Kaleen M Lavin1,2,3, Paul M Coen4,5, Liliana C Baptista1,6, Margaret B Bell1,2, Devin Drummer1,2, Sara A Harper1,6, Manoel E Lixandrão1,2, Jeremy S McAdam1,2, Samia M O'Bryan1,2, Sofhia Ramos4,5, Lisa M Roberts1,6, Rick B Vega4,5, Bret H Goodpaster4,5, Marcas M Bamman1,2,3, Thomas W Buford1,6.   

Abstract

For centuries, regular exercise has been acknowledged as a potent stimulus to promote, maintain, and restore healthy functioning of nearly every physiological system of the human body. With advancing understanding of the complexity of human physiology, continually evolving methodological possibilities, and an increasingly dire public health situation, the study of exercise as a preventative or therapeutic treatment has never been more interdisciplinary, or more impactful. During the early stages of the NIH Common Fund Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium (MoTrPAC) Initiative, the field is well-positioned to build substantially upon the existing understanding of the mechanisms underlying benefits associated with exercise. Thus, we present a comprehensive body of the knowledge detailing the current literature basis surrounding the molecular adaptations to exercise in humans to provide a view of the state of the field at this critical juncture, as well as a resource for scientists bringing external expertise to the field of exercise physiology. In reviewing current literature related to molecular and cellular processes underlying exercise-induced benefits and adaptations, we also draw attention to existing knowledge gaps warranting continued research effort. © 2021 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 12:3193-3279, 2022.
Copyright © 2022 American Physiological Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35578962      PMCID: PMC9186317          DOI: 10.1002/cphy.c200033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Compr Physiol        ISSN: 2040-4603            Impact factor:   8.915


  1456 in total

Review 1.  Exercise training-induced alterations in skeletal muscle antioxidant capacity: a brief review.

Authors:  S K Powers; L L Ji; C Leeuwenburgh
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  The long-term effects of a randomized trial comparing aerobic interval versus continuous training in coronary artery disease patients: 1-year data from the SAINTEX-CAD study.

Authors:  Nele Pattyn; Luc Vanhees; Véronique A Cornelissen; Ellen Coeckelberghs; Catherine De Maeyer; Kaatje Goetschalckx; Nadine Possemiers; Kurt Wuyts; Emeline M Van Craenenbroeck; Paul J Beckers
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 7.804

Review 3.  Protein metabolism in women and men: similarities and disparities.

Authors:  Melissa M Markofski; Elena Volpi
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.294

4.  Aerobic plus resistance training was more effective in improving the visceral adiposity, metabolic profile and inflammatory markers than aerobic training in obese adolescents.

Authors:  Ana Raimunda Dâmaso; Raquel Munhoz da Silveira Campos; Danielle Arisa Caranti; Aline de Piano; Mauro Fisberg; Denis Foschini; Priscila de Lima Sanches; Lian Tock; Henrique Manoel Lederman; Sergio Tufik; Marco Túlio de Mello
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.337

5.  In vivo measurement of human tibial strains during vigorous activity.

Authors:  D B Burr; C Milgrom; D Fyhrie; M Forwood; M Nyska; A Finestone; S Hoshaw; E Saiag; A Simkin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  The epidemiology of mortality after fracture in England: variation by age, sex, time, geographic location, and ethnicity.

Authors:  C Klop; T P van Staa; C Cooper; N C Harvey; F de Vries
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  High-density lipoprotein cholesterol efflux capacity is inversely associated with cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chengfeng Qiu; Xiang Zhao; Quan Zhou; Zhen Zhang
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  A Critical Evaluation of the Biological Construct Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: Size Matters but So Does the Measurement.

Authors:  Cody T Haun; Christopher G Vann; Brandon M Roberts; Andrew D Vigotsky; Brad J Schoenfeld; Michael D Roberts
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 9.  Recent advances in understanding resistance exercise training-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy in humans.

Authors:  Sophie Joanisse; Changhyun Lim; James McKendry; Jonathan C Mcleod; Tanner Stokes; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-02-24

10.  Comparative profiling of skeletal muscle models reveals heterogeneity of transcriptome and metabolism.

Authors:  Ahmed M Abdelmoez; Laura Sardón Puig; Jonathon A B Smith; Brendan M Gabriel; Mladen Savikj; Lucile Dollet; Alexander V Chibalin; Anna Krook; Juleen R Zierath; Nicolas J Pillon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.249

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.