Literature DB >> 30403559

An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.

Yu Du1, Jun Yin2, Daniel J Sargent2, Sumithra J Mandrekar2.   

Abstract

Phase I designs traditionally use the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), a binary endpoint from the first treatment cycle, to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) assuming a monotonically increasing relationship between dose and efficacy. In this article, we establish a general framework for a multi-stage adaptive design where we jointly model a continuous efficacy outcome and continuous/quasi-continuous toxicity endpoints from multiple treatment cycles. The normalized Total Toxicity Profile (nTTP) is used as an illustration for quasi-continuous toxicity endpoints, and we replace DLT with nTTP to take into account multiple grades and types of toxicities. In addition, the proposed design accommodates non-monotone dose-efficacy relationships, and longitudinal toxicity data in effort to capture the adverse events from multiple cycles. Stage 1 of our design uses toxicity data to perform dose-escalation and identify a set of initially allowable (safe) doses; stage 2 of our design incorporates an efficacy outcome to update the set of allowable doses for each new cohort and randomizes the new cohort of patients to the allowable doses with emphasis towards those with higher predicted efficacy. Stage 3 uses all data from all treated patients at the end of the trial to make final recommendations. Simulations showed that the design had a high probability of making the correct dose selection and good overdose control across various dose-efficacy and dose-toxicity scenarios. In addition, the proposed design allows for early termination when all doses are too toxic. To our best knowledge, the proposed dual-endpoint dose-finding design is the first such study to incorporate multiple cycles of toxicities and a continuous efficacy outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive design; bayesian method; dose-finding; joint modeling; phase I clinical trial; toxicity-efficacy dual endpoint

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30403559      PMCID: PMC6379115          DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2018.1535497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  10 in total

1.  Longitudinal design for phase I clinical trials using the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  A T Legedza; J G Ibrahim
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2000-12

2.  Regression analysis when covariates are regression parameters of a random effects model for observed longitudinal measurements.

Authors:  C Y Wang; N Wang; S Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Optimal dose-finding designs with correlated continuous and discrete responses.

Authors:  Valerii Fedorov; Yuehui Wu; Rongmei Zhang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  A Bayesian dose-finding design incorporating toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Rui Qin; Monia Ezzalfani; Daniel J Sargent; Sumithra J Mandrekar
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a phase I/II dose-finding trial.

Authors:  B Nebiyou Bekele; Yu Shen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Toxicity burden score: a novel approach to summarize multiple toxic effects.

Authors:  S M Lee; D L Hershman; P Martin; J P Leonard; Y K Cheung
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; John D Cook
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Simultaneously optimizing dose and schedule of a new cytotoxic agent.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun; Peter F Thall; Hoang Nguyen; Marcos de Lima
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Utility-based optimization of combination therapy using ordinal toxicity and efficacy in phase I/II trials.

Authors:  Nadine Houede; Peter F Thall; Hoang Nguyen; Xavier Paoletti; Andrew Kramar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Dose-finding designs using a novel quasi-continuous endpoint for multiple toxicities.

Authors:  Monia Ezzalfani; Sarah Zohar; Rui Qin; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Marie-Cécile Le Deley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 2.373

  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Challenges, opportunities, and innovative statistical designs for precision oncology trials.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Shihao Shen; Qian Shi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-09

2.  Designing Dose-Finding Phase I Clinical Trials: Top 10 Questions That Should Be Discussed With Your Statistician.

Authors:  Shing M Lee; Nolan A Wages; Karyn A Goodman; A Craig Lockhart
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-02-01

3.  phase1RMD: An R package for repeated measures dose-finding designs with novel toxicity and efficacy endpoints.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Yu Du; Rui Qin; Shihao Shen; Sumithra Mandrekar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.