Literature DB >> 21536663

Toxicity burden score: a novel approach to summarize multiple toxic effects.

S M Lee1, D L Hershman, P Martin, J P Leonard, Y K Cheung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Toxicity data from cancer trials are summarized into a single outcome, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), which does not account for multiple lower grade toxic effects nor differentiates between toxicity types and gradations within DLT.
METHODS: Toxicity data were summarized into a toxicity burden score (TBS) using a weighted sum. The severity weights were estimated via regression using historical data. We demonstrated the method using historical data from a bortezomib trial and illustrated the advantages of defining DLT based on TBS in a simulated dose-finding trial.
RESULTS: The estimated weights were 0.17, 0.40 and 0.85 for grade 1/2, grade 3 and grade 4 platelets, respectively; 0.19, 0.64, 1.03 and 2.53 for grade 1, 2, 3 and 4 neuropathy, respectively and 0.17 for each grade 3 or higher nonhematologic toxic effects unrelated to treatment. In the simulated trial, the probability of selecting doses above the maximum tolerated dose decreased when using the DLT defined based on TBS.
CONCLUSIONS: TBS is a feasible approach to summarize toxicity. It includes information from the grades and types of multiple toxic effects and can be applied in all phases of drug development. Further efforts should focus on validating the method in a large prospective study before applying it in practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21536663      PMCID: PMC3295018          DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  13 in total

1.  Phase I clinical trial design in cancer drug development.

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P J O'Dwyer; M Christian; J S Humphrey
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  The need for adverse effects reporting standards in oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  Andy Trotti; Soren M Bentzen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-02       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Continual reassessment method with multiple toxicity constraints.

Authors:  Shing M Lee; Bin Cheng; Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M Pepe; L Fisher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Phase I trial design: are new methodologies being put into practice?

Authors:  S F Dent; E A Eisenhauer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials with late-onset toxicities.

Authors:  Y K Cheung; R Chappell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Patient characteristics compete with dose as predictors of acute treatment toxicity in early phase clinical trials.

Authors:  André Rogatko; James S Babb; Hao Wang; Michael J Slifker; Gary R Hudes
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  The continual reassessment method for multiple toxicity grades: a Bayesian quasi-likelihood approach.

Authors:  Z Yuan; R Chappell; H Bailey
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Nomograms to predict serious adverse events in phase II clinical trials of molecularly targeted agents.

Authors:  Gregory R Pond; Lillian L Siu; Malcolm Moore; Amit Oza; Hal W Hirte; Eric Winquist; Glenwood Goss; Gary Hudes; Carol A Townsley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  TAME: development of a new method for summarising adverse events of cancer treatment by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

Authors:  Andy Trotti; Thomas F Pajak; Clement K Gwede; Rebecca Paulus; Jay Cooper; Arlene Forastiere; John A Ridge; Deborah Watkins-Bruner; Adam S Garden; K Kian Ang; Wally Curran
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  18 in total

1.  Longitudinal Toxicity over Time (ToxT) analysis to evaluate tolerability: a case study of lenalidomide in the CALGB 50401 (Alliance) trial.

Authors:  Gita Thanarajasingam; John P Leonard; Thomas E Witzig; Thomas M Habermann; Kristie A Blum; Nancy L Bartlett; Christopher R Flowers; Brandelyn N Pitcher; Sin-Ho Jung; Pamela J Atherton; Angelina Tan; Paul J Novotny; Amylou C Dueck
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 18.959

2.  An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.

Authors:  Yu Du; Jun Yin; Daniel J Sargent; Sumithra J Mandrekar
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  Phase 1 adaptive dose-finding study of neoadjuvant gemcitabine combined with radiation therapy for patients with high-risk extremity and trunk soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  William W Tseng; Shouhao Zhou; Christina A To; Peter F Thall; Alexander J Lazar; Raphael E Pollock; Patrick P Lin; Janice N Cormier; Valerae O Lewis; Barry W Feig; Kelly K Hunt; Matthew T Ballo; Shreyaskumar Patel; Peter W T Pisters
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Dose-finding designs for cumulative toxicities using multiple constraints.

Authors:  Shing M Lee; Moreno Ursino; Ying Kuen Cheung; Sarah Zohar
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 5.  Understanding Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Priyanka A Pophali; Gita Thanarajasingam
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.722

6.  Simple benchmark for complex dose finding studies.

Authors:  Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Estimating global treatment toxicity burden from adverse-event data.

Authors:  Shing M Lee; Dawn L Hershman; Jieling Miao; Xiaobo Zhong; Joseph M Unger; Ying Kuen Ken Cheung
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Adaptive designs for dual-agent phase I dose-escalation studies.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harrington; Graham M Wheeler; Michael J Sweeting; Adrian P Mander; Duncan I Jodrell
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Adverse event load, onset, and maximum grade: A novel method of reporting adverse events in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Guilherme S Lopes; Christophe Tournigand; Curtis L Olswold; Romain Cohen; Emmanuelle Kempf; Leonard Saltz; Richard M Goldberg; Herbert Hurwitz; Charles Fuchs; Aimery de Gramont; Qian Shi
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Designing Dose-Finding Phase I Clinical Trials: Top 10 Questions That Should Be Discussed With Your Statistician.

Authors:  Shing M Lee; Nolan A Wages; Karyn A Goodman; A Craig Lockhart
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.