Literature DB >> 30402943

Office blood pressure measurement types: Different methodology-Different clinical conclusions.

George S Stergiou1, Konstantinos G Kyriakoulis1, Anastasios Kollias1.   

Abstract

The measurement of blood pressure in the office (OBP) remains the basis for hypertension diagnosis and management for more than half a century. Despite the increasing use of out-of-office blood pressure measurement using home and less so ambulatory monitoring and their endorsement by hypertension societies, at present and for some time to come it is likely that in many people the diagnosis and management of hypertension will be based on OBP measurement alone. OBP measurement is a very variable method affected by multiple factors, which have major impact on the OBP level, reproducibility and prognostic ability. Thus, there are several types of OBP measurement, depending on the device type, conditions, observer's presence and the number of readings. The 4 main OBP types are: Type I: Auscultatory OBP in clinical practice; Type II: Automated attended OBP in clinical practice; Type III: Research setting OBP; Type IV: Unattended automated OBP. These OBP types have different standardization level, different reproducibility, different clinical relevance and different thresholds for hypertension diagnosis. Unless the methodological details of OBP measurement are reported, any conclusions based on such measurements in clinical research and in practice are questionable. ©2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30402943      PMCID: PMC8030792          DOI: 10.1111/jch.13420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  14 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of blood pressure in the office: recognizing the problem and proposing the solution.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Marshall Godwin; Martin Dawes; Alexander Kiss; Sheldon W Tobe; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Knowledge, availability, and use of ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring in primary care in Spain: the MAMPA study.

Authors:  Enrique Martín-Rioboó; Luis A Pérula de Torres; José R Banegas; José M Lobos-Bejarano; Carlos Brotons Cuixart; Emilio I García Criado; Pilar Martin-Carrillo; María Martín-Rabadán Muro; M Isabel Egocheaga Cabello; Antoni Maiques Galán
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.844

3.  Reproducibility of home, ambulatory, and clinic blood pressure: implications for the design of trials for the assessment of antihypertensive drug efficacy.

Authors:  George S Stergiou; Nikolaos M Baibas; Alexandra P Gantzarou; Irini I Skeva; Chrysa B Kalkana; Leonidas G Roussias; Theodore D Mountokalakis
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of home vs. ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in untreated and treated hypertension.

Authors:  Efthimia G Nasothimiou; Dimitrios Tzamouranis; Vagia Rarra; Leonidas G Roussias; George S Stergiou
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.872

5.  Thresholds for Diagnosing Hypertension Based on Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements and Cardiovascular Risk.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Janusz Kaczorowski; J Michael Paterson; Lisa Dolovich; Karen Tu
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 6.  A review of blood pressure measurement protocols among hypertension trials: implications for "evidence-based" clinical practice.

Authors:  Paolo Giorgini; Alan B Weder; Elizabeth A Jackson; Robert D Brook
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2014-07-09

7.  Blood Pressure Measurement in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).

Authors:  Karen C Johnson; Paul K Whelton; William C Cushman; Jeffrey A Cutler; Gregory W Evans; Joni K Snyder; Walter T Ambrosius; Srinivasan Beddhu; Alfred K Cheung; Lawrence J Fine; Cora E Lewis; Mahboob Rahman; David M Reboussin; Michael V Rocco; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Comparison of automated clinical and research blood pressure measurements: Implications for clinical practice and trial design.

Authors:  Olive Tang; Stephen P Juraschek; Lawrence J Appel; Lisa A Cooper; Jeanne Charleston; Romsai T Boonyasai; Kathryn A Carson; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Edgar R Miller
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 9.  2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Paul K Whelton; Robert M Carey; Wilbert S Aronow; Donald E Casey; Karen J Collins; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sondra M DePalma; Samuel Gidding; Kenneth A Jamerson; Daniel W Jones; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul Muntner; Bruce Ovbiagele; Sidney C Smith; Crystal C Spencer; Randall S Stafford; Sandra J Taler; Randal J Thomas; Kim A Williams; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 9.897

10.  A Short History of Automated Office Blood Pressure - 15 Years to SPRINT.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Automated Office-Based Blood Pressure Measurement: an Overview and Guidance for Implementation in Primary Care.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Erika L McCannon; Joseph E Landavaso
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  The Impact of Measurement Methods on Office Blood Pressure and Management of Hypertension in General Practice.

Authors:  Julia Höller; Linda Elizabeth Villagomez Fuentes; Klaus Matthias; Reinhold Kreutz
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2019-11-09

3.  Unattended versus attended automated office blood pressure: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using the same methodology for both methods.

Authors:  Anastasios Kollias; Emelina Stambolliu; Konstantinos G Kyriakoulis; Areti Gravvani; George S Stergiou
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-12-25       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Determination of optimal on-treatment diastolic blood pressure range using automated measurements in subjects with cardiovascular disease-Analysis of a SPRINT trial subpopulation.

Authors:  Piotr Sobieraj; Jacek Lewandowski; Maciej Siński; Zbigniew Gaciong
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  A meta-analysis helps to clarify the use of automated office blood pressure in clinical practice.

Authors:  Anastasios Kollias; Emelina Stambolliu; Konstantinos G Kyriakoulis; Areti Gravvani; George S Stergiou
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Blood pressure target for hypertension in chronic kidney disease: One size does not fit all.

Authors:  Anastasios Kollias; Konstantinos G Kyriakoulis; George S Stergiou
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Blood pressure targets in patients with chronic kidney disease: A critical evaluation of clinical-trial evidence and guideline recommendations.

Authors:  Panagiotis I Georgianos; Vasilios Vaios; Pantelis E Zebekakis; Vassilios Liakopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Optimizing observer performance of clinic blood pressure measurement: a position statement from the Lancet Commission on Hypertension Group.

Authors:  Raj Padwal; Norm R C Campbell; Aletta E Schutte; Michael Hecht Olsen; Christian Delles; Anthony Etyang; J Kennedy Cruickshank; George Stergiou; Michael K Rakotz; Gregory Wozniak; Marc G Jaffe; Ivor Benjamin; Gianfranco Parati; James E Sharman
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  More reasons to use automated office blood pressure in clinical practice.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.738

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.