Literature DB >> 30834676

A meta-analysis helps to clarify the use of automated office blood pressure in clinical practice.

Anastasios Kollias1, Emelina Stambolliu1, Konstantinos G Kyriakoulis1, Areti Gravvani1, George S Stergiou1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2019        PMID： 30834676      PMCID： PMC8030603          DOI： 10.1111/jch.13506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN： 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  Unattended versus attended blood pressure measurement: Mean values and determinants of the difference.

Authors:  Anna Paini; Fabio Bertacchini; Deborah Stassaldi; Carlo Aggiusti; Giulia Maruelli; Chiara Arnoldi; Carolina De Ciuceis; Claudia Agabiti Rosei; Damiano Rizzoni; Roberto Gatta; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Maria Lorenza Muiesan; Massimo Salvetti
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Attended Versus Unattended Blood Pressure Measurement in a Real Life Setting.

Authors:  Frederic Bauer; Felix S Seibert; Benjamin Rohn; Klaus A R Bauer; Eckart Rolshoven; Nina Babel; Timm H Westhoff
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Blood pressure measurement in an ambulatory setting: concordance between physician and patient self-measurement.

Authors:  E Vinyoles; X Blancafort; C López-Quiñones; M Arqué; A Brau; N Cerdán; M de la Figuera; F Díaz; E Pujol
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  White coat effect in hypertensive patients: the role of hospital environment or physician presence.

Authors:  Xi-Xing Wang; Wei Shuai; Qiang Peng; Ju-Xiang Li; Ping Li; Xiao-Shu Cheng; Hai Su
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2017-06-21

5.  A meta-analysis that helps clarify the use of automated office blood pressure in clinical practice.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Unobserved automated office BP is similar to other clinic BP measurements: A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Vasilios Papademetriou; Costas Tsioufis; Annice Chung; Charalampia Geladari; Emmanuel A Andreadis
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Office blood pressure measurement types: Different methodology-Different clinical conclusions.

Authors:  George S Stergiou; Konstantinos G Kyriakoulis; Anastasios Kollias
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Comparing Automated Office Blood Pressure Readings With Other Methods of Blood Pressure Measurement for Identifying Patients With Possible Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael Roerecke; Janusz Kaczorowski; Martin G Myers
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 44.409

9.  Optimising the accuracy of blood pressure monitoring in chronic kidney disease: the utility of BpTRU.

Authors:  Shona Brothwell; Mary Dutton; Charles Ferro; Stephanie Stringer; Paul Cockwell
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.388

10.  Attended and Unattended Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements Have Better Agreement With Ambulatory Monitoring Than Conventional Office Readings.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos; Florentia S Savva; Anna I Georgantoni; Vasilios Papademetriou
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 5.501
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.