| Literature DB >> 30399191 |
Johannes Laimer1, Raphael Henn2, Tom Helten1, Susanne Sprung3, Bettina Zelger3, Bernhard Zelger4, René Steiner5, Dagmar Schnabl5, Vincent Offermanns1, Emanuel Bruckmoser6, Christian W Huck2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dark pigmented lesions of the oral mucosa can represent a major diagnostic challenge. A biopsy is usually required to determine the nature of such intraoral discolorations. This study investigates the potential use of infrared spectroscopy for differential diagnosis of amalgam tattoos versus benign or malignant melanocytic neoplasms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30399191 PMCID: PMC6219804 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Total number of amalgam tattoos, benign and malignant melanocytic lesions of all 22 cases.
| Case number | Gender (F: female, M: male) | Age (in years) | Location | Amalgam | Benign melanocytic lesions | Malignant melanocytic lesions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | 39 | lower lip | X | ||
| 2 | F | 88 | cheek | X | ||
| 3 | F | 52 | lower lip | X | ||
| 4 | F | 32 | upper lip | X | ||
| 5 | M | 53 | lower lip | X | ||
| 6 | M | 77 | lower lip | X | ||
| 7 | F | 77 | lower lip | X | ||
| 8 | F | 65 | upper lip | X | ||
| 9 | M | 26 | lower lip | X | ||
| 10 | M | 38 | lower lip | X | ||
| 11 | F | 80 | oral cavity | X | ||
| 12 | M | 51 | cheek | X | ||
| 13 | F | 79 | cheek | X | ||
| 14 | F | 77 | mandible | X | ||
| 15 | F | 63 | mandible | X | ||
| 16 | M | 82 | maxilla | X | ||
| 17 | F | 57 | oral cavity | X | ||
| 18 | M | 78 | oral cavity | X | ||
| 19 | F | 68 | oral cavity | X | ||
| 20 | M | 56 | oral cavity | X | ||
| 21 | F | 36 | cheek | X | ||
| 22 | M | 49 | maxilla | X |
Fig 1MIR spectra.
Raw experimental MIR spectra (absorbance in arbitrary units (a.u.) versus wavenumbers) of the investigated samples are shown (a). Each spectrum represents the average of one region of interest (ROI). The color coding represents the assignment to one of the two investigated classes which are amalgam (red) or non-amalgam (black). The spectra after baseline correction (b) and, additionally, the first Savitzky Golay derivative (c) are shown.
Major spectral peaks of tissue samples.
| Wavenumber in cm-1 | Assignation |
|---|---|
| ≈ 3300 | Amide A, |
| ≈ 3100 | Amide B, |
| ≈ 3010 | |
| ≈ 2920 and 2850 | |
| ≈ 2956 and 2872 | |
| ≈ 1745–1735 | |
| ≈ 1620–1695 | Amide I-band, proteins |
| ≈ 1550 | Amide II-band, proteins |
| ≈ 1400 | |
| ≈ 1360–1260 | Amide III-band (mainly C-N stretching) with contributions from |
| ≈ 1350–1260 | |
| ≈ 1310–1240 | Amide III-band, proteins |
| ≈ 1250–1220 | |
| ≈ 1225 | |
| ≈ 1185–1120 | C-O ring vibration of nucleic acid “sugars” |
| ≈ 1084 |
Fig 2PCA scores plot of ROIs explaining 86% of the total variance in the data.
Amalgam (red) and non-amalgam (blue) regions can be discriminated visually with few exceptions.
Fig 3Correlation between the HE stained tissue section (3a) and the corresponding false color infrared image after hierarchical cluster analysis using 10 clusters (3b). The amalgam containing area is framed in the HE stained section.