Literature DB >> 30398431

Chest Radiographs in Congestive Heart Failure: Visualizing Neural Network Learning.

Jarrel C Y Seah1, Jennifer S N Tang1, Andy Kitchen1, Frank Gaillard1, Andrew F Dixon1.   

Abstract

Purpose To examine Generative Visual Rationales (GVRs) as a tool for visualizing neural network learning of chest radiograph features in congestive heart failure (CHF). Materials and Methods A total of 103 489 frontal chest radiographs in 46 712 patients acquired from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2016, were divided into a labeled data set (with B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP] result as a marker of CHF) and unlabeled data set (without BNP result). A generative model was trained on the unlabeled data set, and a neural network was trained on the encoded representations of the labeled data set to estimate BNP. The model was used to visualize how a radiograph with high estimated BNP would look without disease (a "healthy" radiograph). An overfitted model was developed for comparison, and 100 GVRs were blindly assessed by two experts for features of CHF. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), κ coefficient, and mixed-effects logistic regression were used for statistical analyses. Results At a cutoff BNP of 100 ng/L as a marker of CHF, the correctly trained model achieved an AUC of 0.82. Assessment of GVRs revealed that the correctly trained model highlighted conventional radiographic features of CHF as reasons for an elevated BNP prediction more frequently than the overfitted model, including cardiomegaly (153 [76.5%] of 200 vs 64 [32%] of 200, respectively; P < .001) and pleural effusions (47 [23.5%] of 200 vs 16 [8%] of 200, respectively; P = .003). Conclusion Features of congestive heart failure on chest radiographs learned by neural networks can be identified using Generative Visual Rationales, enabling detection of bias and overfitted models. © RSNA, 2018 See also the editorial by Ngo in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30398431     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018180887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  23 in total

Review 1.  Could Blockchain Technology Empower Patients, Improve Education, and Boost Research in Radiology Departments? An Open Question for Future Applications.

Authors:  Francesco Verde; Arnaldo Stanzione; Valeria Romeo; Renato Cuocolo; Simone Maurea; Arturo Brunetti
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Deep learning for cardiovascular medicine: a practical primer.

Authors:  Chayakrit Krittanawong; Kipp W Johnson; Robert S Rosenson; Zhen Wang; Mehmet Aydar; Usman Baber; James K Min; W H Wilson Tang; Jonathan L Halperin; Sanjiv M Narayan
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence: reshaping the practice of radiological sciences in the 21st century.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Masoom A Haider; Maryellen L Giger; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Mitigating Bias in Radiology Machine Learning: 3. Performance Metrics.

Authors:  Shahriar Faghani; Bardia Khosravi; Kuan Zhang; Mana Moassefi; Jaidip Manikrao Jagtap; Fred Nugen; Sanaz Vahdati; Shiba P Kuanar; Seyed Moein Rassoulinejad-Mousavi; Yashbir Singh; Diana V Vera Garcia; Pouria Rouzrokh; Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-08-24

5.  Generative models for reproducible coronary calcium scoring.

Authors:  Sanne G M van Velzen; Bob D de Vos; Julia M H Noothout; Helena M Verkooijen; Max A Viergever; Ivana Išgum
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-05-31

6.  Deep Learning to Quantify Pulmonary Edema in Chest Radiographs.

Authors:  Steven Horng; Ruizhi Liao; Xin Wang; Sandeep Dalal; Polina Golland; Seth J Berkowitz
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-01-06

7.  Assessing Cancer Risk from Mammograms: Deep Learning Is Superior to Conventional Risk Models.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Sitek; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 29.146

8.  Analysis of Potential for User Errors in Mobile Deployment of Radiology Deep Learning for Cardiac Rhythm Device Detection.

Authors:  Carl Sabottke; Marc Breaux; Rebecca Lee; Adam Foreman; Bradley Spieler
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.903

9.  Anatomic Point-Based Lung Region with Zone Identification for Radiologist Annotation and Machine Learning for Chest Radiographs.

Authors:  Feng Li; Samuel G Armato; Roger Engelmann; Thomas Rhines; Jennie Crosby; Li Lan; Maryellen L Giger; Heber MacMahon
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.903

Review 10.  Interpretation and visualization techniques for deep learning models in medical imaging.

Authors:  Daniel T Huff; Amy J Weisman; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.