| Literature DB >> 36204539 |
Shahriar Faghani1, Bardia Khosravi1, Kuan Zhang1, Mana Moassefi1, Jaidip Manikrao Jagtap1, Fred Nugen1, Sanaz Vahdati1, Shiba P Kuanar1, Seyed Moein Rassoulinejad-Mousavi1, Yashbir Singh1, Diana V Vera Garcia1, Pouria Rouzrokh1, Bradley J Erickson1.
Abstract
The increasing use of machine learning (ML) algorithms in clinical settings raises concerns about bias in ML models. Bias can arise at any step of ML creation, including data handling, model development, and performance evaluation. Potential biases in the ML model can be minimized by implementing these steps correctly. This report focuses on performance evaluation and discusses model fitness, as well as a set of performance evaluation toolboxes: namely, performance metrics, performance interpretation maps, and uncertainty quantification. By discussing the strengths and limitations of each toolbox, our report highlights strategies and considerations to mitigate and detect biases during performance evaluations of radiology artificial intelligence models. Keywords: Segmentation, Diagnosis, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) © RSNA, 2022.Entities:
Keywords: Convolutional Neural Network (CNN); Diagnosis; Segmentation
Year: 2022 PMID: 36204539 PMCID: PMC9530766 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.220061
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiol Artif Intell ISSN: 2638-6100