Sanne G M van Velzen1,2,3,4, Bob D de Vos1,2,3, Julia M H Noothout1,2,3, Helena M Verkooijen5, Max A Viergever4, Ivana Išgum1,2,3,6. 1. Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Heart Failure and Arrhythmias, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. University of Amsterdam, Informatics Institute, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, Image Sciences Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 5. University Medical Center Utrecht, Imaging Division, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 6. Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Purpose: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, i.e., the amount of CAC quantified in CT, is a strong and independent predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD) events. However, CAC scoring suffers from limited interscan reproducibility, which is mainly due to the clinical definition requiring application of a fixed intensity level threshold for segmentation of calcifications. This limitation is especially pronounced in non-electrocardiogram-synchronized computed tomography (CT) where lesions are more impacted by cardiac motion and partial volume effects. Therefore, we propose a CAC quantification method that does not require a threshold for segmentation of CAC. Approach: Our method utilizes a generative adversarial network (GAN) where a CT with CAC is decomposed into an image without CAC and an image showing only CAC. The method, using a cycle-consistent GAN, was trained using 626 low-dose chest CTs and 514 radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) CTs. Interscan reproducibility was compared to clinical calcium scoring in RTP CTs of 1662 patients, each having two scans. Results: A lower relative interscan difference in CAC mass was achieved by the proposed method: 47% compared to 89% manual clinical calcium scoring. The intraclass correlation coefficient of Agatston scores was 0.96 for the proposed method compared to 0.91 for automatic clinical calcium scoring. Conclusions: The increased interscan reproducibility achieved by our method may lead to increased reliability of CHD risk categorization and improved accuracy of CHD event prediction.
Purpose: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, i.e., the amount of CAC quantified in CT, is a strong and independent predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD) events. However, CAC scoring suffers from limited interscan reproducibility, which is mainly due to the clinical definition requiring application of a fixed intensity level threshold for segmentation of calcifications. This limitation is especially pronounced in non-electrocardiogram-synchronized computed tomography (CT) where lesions are more impacted by cardiac motion and partial volume effects. Therefore, we propose a CAC quantification method that does not require a threshold for segmentation of CAC. Approach: Our method utilizes a generative adversarial network (GAN) where a CT with CAC is decomposed into an image without CAC and an image showing only CAC. The method, using a cycle-consistent GAN, was trained using 626 low-dose chest CTs and 514 radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) CTs. Interscan reproducibility was compared to clinical calcium scoring in RTP CTs of 1662 patients, each having two scans. Results: A lower relative interscan difference in CAC mass was achieved by the proposed method: 47% compared to 89% manual clinical calcium scoring. The intraclass correlation coefficient of Agatston scores was 0.96 for the proposed method compared to 0.91 for automatic clinical calcium scoring. Conclusions: The increased interscan reproducibility achieved by our method may lead to increased reliability of CHD risk categorization and improved accuracy of CHD event prediction.
Authors: Nikolas Lessmann; Bram van Ginneken; Majd Zreik; Pim A de Jong; Bob D de Vos; Max A Viergever; Ivana Isgum Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Jurica Šprem; Bob D de Vos; Nikolas Lessmann; Pim A de Jong; Max A Viergever; Ivana Išgum Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2018-12-11
Authors: Harvey S Hecht; Paul Cronin; Michael J Blaha; Matthew J Budoff; Ella A Kazerooni; Jagat Narula; David Yankelevitz; Suhny Abbara Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2016-11-10
Authors: Robert C Detrano; Melissa Anderson; Jennifer Nelson; Nathan D Wong; J Jeffrey Carr; Michael McNitt-Gray; Diane E Bild Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-06-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Peter C A Jacobs; Ivana Isgum; Martijn J A Gondrie; Willem P Th M Mali; Bram van Ginneken; Mathias Prokop; Yolanda van der Graaf Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Amy Berrington de González; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Kwang-Pyo Kim; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Rebecca Lewis; Fred Mettler; Charles Land Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-12-14
Authors: Marleen J Emaus; Ivana Išgum; Sanne G M van Velzen; H J G Desirée van den Bongard; Sofie A M Gernaat; Nikolas Lessmann; Margriet G A Sattler; Arco J Teske; Joan Penninkhof; Hanneke Meijer; Jean-Philippe Pignol; Helena M Verkooijen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-07-27 Impact factor: 2.692