Literature DB >> 30394514

Gender differences in the distal radial artery diameter for the snuffbox approach.

Yongcheol Kim, Youngkeun Ahn1, Min Chul Kim, Doo Sun Sim, Young Joon Hong, Ju Han Kim, Myung Ho Jeong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, interventional cardiologists have been increasingly interested in snuffbox approach for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there is lack of data regarding distal radial artery (RA) diameter according to gender. Therefore, the aim herein was to investigate gender differences in the diameter of distal RA diameter.
METHODS: Left snuffbox approach was done in 117 patients who had planned CAG or PCI for suspected myocardial ischemia between 1 December 2017 and 28 February 2018 at the Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea. Left RA angiography was achieved from 101 patients. Among 101 individuals, 69 (68.3%) men and 32 (31.7%) women were enrolled. There was no significant difference in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body mass index, left ventricular systolic function, or patients with acute coronary syndrome in either group.
RESULTS: The average diameter of distal RA was 2.57 mm in all patients. Women had a significantly smaller diameter of distal RA than men (2.40 mm vs. 2.65 mm, p = 0.016). Nevertheless, CAG via snuffbox approach by 6 Fr sheath was successfully performed in all 117 patients. Regarding success rate of the distal RA approach, women had a lower success rate (32/38) compared with men (72/79), but not significantly (84.2% vs. 91.1%, p = 0.264).
CONCLUSIONS: Females has a significantly smaller distal RA diameter compared to males. Moreover, the success rate of the distal RA approach tends to be higher in men than in women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary angiography; distal radial artery; percutaneous coronary intervention; snuffbox approach

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30394514     DOI: 10.5603/CJ.2018.0128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiol J        ISSN: 1898-018X            Impact factor:   2.737


  15 in total

1.  Distal Transradial Access in the Anatomic Snuffbox for Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography.

Authors:  P Patel; N Majmundar; I Bach; V Dodson; F Al-Mufti; L Tomycz; P Khandelwal
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patient with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction via left snuffbox approach: Patient advantages.

Authors:  Yongcheol Kim; Myung Ho Jeong; Min Chul Kim; Doo Sun Sim; Young Joon Hong; Ju Han Kim; Youngkeun Ahn
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.737

3.  An observational comparison of distal radial and traditional radial approaches for coronary angiography.

Authors:  Anupam Bhambhani; Salil Pandey; Aditi N Nadamani; Kartikey Tyagi
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-04-17

4.  Safety of ultrasound-guided distal radial artery access for abdominopelvic transarterial interventions: a prospective study.

Authors:  Adib Koury; Lucas Moretti Monsignore; Luis Henrique de Castro-Afonso; Daniel Giansante Abud
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Reduction of bleeding complications on puncture site after percutaneous coronary intervention using a 6.5-French sheathless guiding catheter.

Authors:  Hidefumi Akioka; Kunio Yufu; Taisuke Harada; Koshiro Akamine; Tetsuya Uemura; Masaki Takahashi; Kyohei Nishimizu; Kei Hirota; Yumi Ishii; Shintaro Kira; Keisuke Yonezu; Ichitaro Abe; Katsunori Tawara; Hidekazu Kondo; Shotaro Saito; Akira Fukui; Norihiro Okada; Tetsuji Shinohara; Yasushi Teshima; Mikiko Nakagawa; Naohiko Takahashi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Comparison of 4-French versus 5-French sheaths for diagnostic coronary angiography via the snuffbox approach.

Authors:  Ji Woong Roh; Hee-Yeol Kim; Youngkeun Ahn; Myung Ho Jeong; Yongcheol Kim
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 2.737

7.  Distal Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Interventions in Everyday Practice: Data From the TRIANGLE Registry (TwitteR Initiated registry for coronary ANgiography in Germany via distaL radial accEss).

Authors:  Karsten Schenke; Achim Viertel; Nader Joghetaei; Rostislav Prog; Timm Matthiesen; Simon Ohm; Thorsten Dill; Lorenz Bott-Flügel; Gerian Grönefeld
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2021-04-05

Review 8.  Distal transradial access: a review of the feasibility and safety in cardiovascular angiography and intervention.

Authors:  Gaojun Cai; Haomin Huang; Feng Li; Ganwei Shi; Xiaolong Yu; Lei Yu
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 9.  Distal Radial Artery Access: The Future of Cardiovascular Intervention.

Authors:  Zaid Nairoukh; Saira Jahangir; Dennis Adjepong; Bilal Haider Malik
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-03-07

Review 10.  Left Distal Transradial Approach for Coronary Intervention: Insights from Early Clinical Experience and Future Directions.

Authors:  Hao Feng; Zhenfei Fang; Shenghua Zhou; Xinqun Hu
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 1.866

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.