Literature DB >> 33821448

Distal Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Interventions in Everyday Practice: Data From the TRIANGLE Registry (TwitteR Initiated registry for coronary ANgiography in Germany via distaL radial accEss).

Karsten Schenke1, Achim Viertel2, Nader Joghetaei3, Rostislav Prog4, Timm Matthiesen2, Simon Ohm4, Thorsten Dill4, Lorenz Bott-Flügel3, Gerian Grönefeld2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Transradial access (TRA) has become the primary route for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Recently a new puncture site more distally in the area of the anatomical snuffbox has been described. With this multicenter registry, we wish to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of the distal radial access (dRA).
METHODS: Between December 2018 and May 2019 all patients with a planned CAG or PCI via dRA in three cardiology centers in Germany were entered into this registry. Procedural data, puncture success, crossover rate and complications were registered. Proximal and distal radial artery patency were examined by ultrasound within 48 h.
RESULTS: A total of 327 patients were enrolled (mean age: 69 ± 12 years, 69% male gender, 49% PCI), in 5 cases bilateral distal puncture was performed. Puncture success, defined as completed sheath placement was high (N = 316/332, 95%) and the crossover rate was low (27/332, 8%). The rate of proximal radial artery occlusion after 1-48 h was low (2/332 1%), the rate of occlusion at the distal puncture site was also very low (3/332, 1%). Major complications were not encountered.
CONCLUSION: Coronary angiography and interventions via the distal transradial access in the area of the anatomical snuffbox can be performed with a high rate of success and safety. This data suggests a reduced rate of radial artery occlusion compared to previously reported data after cannulation via the standard forearm radial artery puncture site. Randomized studies are needed to further investigate these results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the German registry for clinical trials: DRKS00017110, retrospectively on 07.May 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomical snuffbox; Coronary angiography; Percutaneous coronary interventions; Radial artery occlusion; Transradial access

Year:  2021        PMID: 33821448     DOI: 10.1007/s40119-021-00218-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiol Ther        ISSN: 2193-6544


  26 in total

Review 1.  Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Pierfrancesco Agostoni; Giuseppe G L Biondi-Zoccai; M Luisa de Benedictis; Stefano Rigattieri; Marco Turri; Maurizio Anselmi; Corrado Vassanelli; Piero Zardini; Yves Louvard; Martial Hamon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Gender differences in the distal radial artery diameter for the snuffbox approach.

Authors:  Yongcheol Kim; Youngkeun Ahn; Min Chul Kim; Doo Sun Sim; Young Joon Hong; Ju Han Kim; Myung Ho Jeong
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.737

3.  A "second" radial artery for monitoring the perioperative pediatric cardiac patient.

Authors:  J J Amato; E Solod; R J Cleveland
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 4.  Radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization.

Authors:  Grigorios Avdikos; Aris Karatasakis; Andreas Tsoumeleas; Efstathios Lazaris; Antonios Ziakas; Michael Koutouzis
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

5.  Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI).

Authors:  Ferdinand Kiemeneij
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 6.534

6.  [Peculiarities of arterial access in endovascular surgery in elderly patients].

Authors:  A L Kaledin; I N Kochanov; S S Seletskiĭ; I V Arkharov; T Ia Burak; K L Kozlov
Journal:  Adv Gerontol       Date:  2014

7.  Recanalization and reuse of early occluded radial artery within 6 days after previous transradial diagnostic procedure.

Authors:  Avtandil Babunashvili; David Dundua
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial.

Authors:  Sanjit S Jolly; Salim Yusuf; John Cairns; Kari Niemelä; Denis Xavier; Petr Widimsky; Andrzej Budaj; Matti Niemelä; Vicent Valentin; Basil S Lewis; Alvaro Avezum; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Sunil V Rao; Peggy Gao; Rizwan Afzal; Campbell D Joyner; Susan Chrolavicius; Shamir R Mehta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial.

Authors:  Ivo Bernat; David Horak; Josef Stasek; Martin Mates; Jan Pesek; Petr Ostadal; Vlado Hrabos; Jaroslav Dusek; Jiri Koza; Zdenek Sembera; Miroslav Brtko; Ondrej Aschermann; Michal Smid; Pavel Polansky; Abdul Al Mawiri; Jan Vojacek; Josef Bis; Olivier Costerousse; Olivier F Bertrand; Richard Rokyta
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation.

Authors:  F Kiemeneij; G J Laarman
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1993-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of Transradial Artery Catheterization on Shock Patients.

Authors:  Hui Xu; Wenyong Chen; Mingming Huang; Zenggeng Wang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 2.650

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.