Literature DB >> 32673202

Safety of ultrasound-guided distal radial artery access for abdominopelvic transarterial interventions: a prospective study.

Adib Koury1, Lucas Moretti Monsignore1, Luis Henrique de Castro-Afonso1, Daniel Giansante Abud1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate ultrasound-guided distal radial artery (DRA) access to perform abdominopelvic endovascular procedures.
METHODS: A prospective, observational study was carried out in a single center between December 2017 and February 2019. Forty-two abdominopelvic endovascular procedures were performed by the same operator in 37 patients with DRA access using a 5 F sheath. Most patients were male (67.6%) with a mean age of 62.0±11.4 years (age range, 27.6-82.8 years). Patient characteristics, including Barbeau's test classification, radial and ulnar sizes and technical success, were evaluated. Patients with a DRA smaller than 1.7 mm could not be safely punctured and were not included.
RESULTS: Procedures included chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma in 35 cases (83.3%), embolization of hepatic metastasis in neuroendocrine tumors in 4 cases (9.5%) and other embolization procedures in 3 cases (7.1%). The mean diameters of the DRA, proximal radial artery and proximal ulnar artery were 2.31, 2.63, and 2.09 mm, respectively. Out of 42 DRA puncture attempts, 97.6% (41/42) were successfully performed. There were no postoperative complications related to the access site, such as pain, palsy, paresthesia, occlusion, finger ischemia, bleeding, hematoma, and pseudoaneurysm. Transient forearm discomfort was reported in 7.1% of patients (3/42); one occurrence was associated with kinking rectification, and two occurrences were attributed to small arteries and/or vasospasm.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided DRA access seems to be feasible and safe to perform in abdominopelvic endovascular procedures in patients with a DRA considered amenable to be safely punctured, with high technical success rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32673202      PMCID: PMC7664746          DOI: 10.5152/dir.2020.19543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1305-3825            Impact factor:   2.630


  22 in total

1.  Distal transradial artery access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography as an alternative access site for faster hemostasis.

Authors:  Shunsuke Aoi; Wah Wah Htun; Stephanie Freeo; Samuel Lee; Htoo Kyaw; Victor Alfaro; John Coppola; Samir Pancholy; Tak Kwan
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-02-24       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Distal Radial Artery Access for Noncoronary Endovascular Treatment Is a Safe and Feasible Technique.

Authors:  Lievay van Dam; Tychon Geeraedts; Diederick Bijdevaate; Pieter Jan van Doormaal; Ayleen The; Adriaan Moelker
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Feasibility of distal radial access for carotid interventions: the RADCAR-DISTAL pilot study.

Authors:  Sándor Nardai; Eszter Végh; Viktor Óriás; Balázs Nemes; Júlia Tóth; Artúr Hüttl; Kálmán Hüttl; Babunashvili Avantadil; Olivier Francois Bertrand; Béla Merkely; Zoltán Ruzsa
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 6.534

4.  Distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for diagnostic cerebral angiography.

Authors:  Marie-Christine Brunet; Stephanie H Chen; Samir Sur; David J McCarthy; Brian Snelling; Dileep R Yavagal; Robert M Starke; Eric C Peterson
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 5.836

5.  Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients.

Authors:  Takayuki Naito; Takayuki Sawaoka; Kota Sasaki; Kazutaka Iida; Sachiko Sakuraba; Keiko Yokohama; Haruna Sato; Maki Soma; Emiko Okamura; Takashi Harada; Fuminobu Yoshimachi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2019-01-07

6.  Early Clinical Experience With Right and Left Distal Transradial Access in the Anatomical Snuffbox in 52 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Orazio Valsecchi; Angelina Vassileva; Alberto Francesco Cereda; Paolo Canova; Keisuke Satogami; Luigi Fiocca; Giulio Guagliumi
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.022

7.  Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Giuseppe Ferrante; Sunil V Rao; Peter Jüni; Bruno R Da Costa; Bernhard Reimers; Gianluigi Condorelli; Angelo Anzuini; Sanjit S Jolly; Olivier F Bertrand; Mitchell W Krucoff; Stephan Windecker; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 11.195

8.  The Predictors of Post-Procedural Arm Pain after Transradial Approach in 1706 Patients Underwent Transradial Catheterization.

Authors:  Surya Dharma; Sasko Kedev; Tejas Patel; Ian C Gilchrist; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2018-09-11

9.  Right arm distal transradial (snuffbox) access for coronary catheterization: Initial experience.

Authors:  Antonios Ziakas; Michael Koutouzis; Matthaios Didagelos; Ioannis Tsiafoutis; Antonios Kouparanis; Thomas Gossios; Eleftherios Kontopodis; Andreas Tassopoulos; Konstantina Katsanou; Efstathios Lazaris; Haralambos Karvounis
Journal:  Hellenic J Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-30

10.  Coronary angiography using the left distal radial approach - An alternative site to conventional radial coronary angiography.

Authors:  Elton Soydan; Mustafa Akın
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 1.596

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.