Literature DB >> 35022882

Reduction of bleeding complications on puncture site after percutaneous coronary intervention using a 6.5-French sheathless guiding catheter.

Hidefumi Akioka1, Kunio Yufu2, Taisuke Harada2, Koshiro Akamine2, Tetsuya Uemura2, Masaki Takahashi2, Kyohei Nishimizu2, Kei Hirota2, Yumi Ishii2, Shintaro Kira2, Keisuke Yonezu2, Ichitaro Abe2, Katsunori Tawara2, Hidekazu Kondo2, Shotaro Saito2, Akira Fukui2, Norihiro Okada2, Tetsuji Shinohara2, Yasushi Teshima2, Mikiko Nakagawa2, Naohiko Takahashi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reducing complications at the puncture site after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is important. The diameter of a 6.5-French (Fr) sheathless guiding catheter (GC) is smaller by approximately 2-Fr compared to a 6-Fr conventional sheath. In the present study, we investigated the post-PCI puncture site complications of a transradial approach in each gender while using a 6.5-Fr sheathless GC. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Our study consisted of 332 patients who underwent transradial coronary intervention (TRI) between August 2017 and July 2019. We classified the patients into either the 6.5-Fr sheathless GC (Asahi, Intecc, Aichi, Japan) Group (Sheathless group: n = 182 males, 58 females) or the 6-Fr sheathed GC Group (Sheathed group: n = 150 males, 36 females). We determined the complications at the puncture site: oozing, subcutaneous hemorrhage, formation of hematoma, pseudoaneurysms, and peripheral neuropathy. The body mass index of the patients was greater in the sheathless GC group compared to the sheathed GC group (24.5 ± 3.5 kg/m2 vs. 23.6 ± 3.7 kg/m2, p = 0.02). In males, there was no significant difference in the complication rate at the puncture site between the sheathless GC and sheathed GC groups (19.3% vs. 18.6%, p = 0.88). However, the complication rate at the puncture site in females was higher in the sheathed GC group than in the sheathless GC group (36% vs. 15.5%, p = 0.02). A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the use of a 6.5-Fr sheathless GC independently reduced the complications in female patients (p = 0.006).
CONCLUSION: The use of the 6.5-Fr sheathless GC system in a transradial approach reduced the complications at the puncture site in female patients. The 6.5-Fr sheathless GC system may be a safe option for them compared to the conventional sheath system.
© 2021. Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bleeding complications; Gender differences; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Puncture site; Sheathless guiding catheters

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35022882     DOI: 10.1007/s00380-021-02005-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Vessels        ISSN: 0910-8327            Impact factor:   2.037


  3 in total

1.  Gender differences in the distal radial artery diameter for the snuffbox approach.

Authors:  Yongcheol Kim; Youngkeun Ahn; Min Chul Kim; Doo Sun Sim; Young Joon Hong; Ju Han Kim; Myung Ho Jeong
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  Use of the sheathless guide catheter during routine transradial percutaneous coronary intervention: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Mamas Mamas; Savio D'Souza; Cara Hendry; Razwan Ali; Heather Iles-Smith; Karen Palmer; Magdi El-Omar; Farzin Fath-Ordoubadi; Ludwig Neyses; Douglas G Fraser
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Minimising radial injury: prevention is better than cure.

Authors:  Mamas A Mamas; Douglas G Fraser; Karim Ratib; Farzin Fath-Ordoubadi; Magdi El-Omar; Jim Nolan; Ludwig Neyses
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 6.534

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.