| Literature DB >> 30384477 |
Na Wu1,2,3, Chu Zhang4,5,6, Xiulin Bai7,8,9, Xiaoyue Du10,11,12, Yong He13,14,15.
Abstract
Rapid and accurate discrimination of Chrysanthemum varieties is very important for producers, consumers and market regulators. The feasibility of using hyperspectral imaging combined with deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) algorithm to identify Chrysanthemum varieties was studied in this paper. Hyperspectral images in the spectral range of 874⁻1734 nm were collected for 11,038 samples of seven varieties. Principal component analysis (PCA) was introduced for qualitative analysis. Score images of the first five PCs were used to explore the differences between different varieties. Second derivative (2nd derivative) method was employed to select optimal wavelengths. Support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and DCNN were used to construct discriminant models using full wavelengths and optimal wavelengths. The results showed that all models based on full wavelengths achieved better performance than those based on optimal wavelengths. DCNN based on full wavelengths obtained the best results with an accuracy close to 100% on both training set and testing set. This optimal model was utilized to visualize the classification results. The overall results indicated that hyperspectral imaging combined with DCNN was a very powerful tool for rapid and accurate discrimination of Chrysanthemum varieties. The proposed method exhibited important potential for developing an online Chrysanthemum evaluation system.Entities:
Keywords: Chrysanthemum; deep convolutional neural network; hyperspectral imaging; variety discrimination
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30384477 PMCID: PMC6278476 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23112831
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The average spectra of Chrysanthemum samples of seven varieties.
Figure 2Score images of the first five PCs of seven Chrysanthemum varieties (from left to right: Boju, Chuju, Gongju, Hangbaiju, white Huaiju, yellow Huaiju, and Qiju): (a) PC1; (b) PC2; (c) PC3; (d) PC4; (e) PC5.
Figure 3The 2nd derivative spectra and the selected optimal wavelengths.
Discrimination results of Chrysanthemum varieties by different models using full wavelengths and optimal wavelengths.
| Models | Full Wavelengths | Optimal Wavelengths | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters 1 | Training | Testing | Parameters | Training | Testing | |
| SVM | (106, 10−5) | 99.83% | 94.02% | (107, 10−4) | 98.26% | 90.03% |
| LR | (L2, 100, liblinear) | 99.34% | 96.59% | (L2, 100, liblinear) | 94.35% | 85.75% |
| DCNN | (4, 32, 93) | 99.98% | 99.98% | (3, 32, 125) | 98.45% | 94.27% |
1 The parameters of the discriminant models. (c, g) for SVM, (pi, c’, optimize_algo) for LR, and (num_convs, num_first_kernels, epoch) for DCNN.
Figure 4Visualization of Chrysanthemum varieties (from left to right: Boju, Chuju, Gongju, Hangbaiju, white Huaiju, yellow Huaiju, and Qiju): (a) Original grayscale images; (b) The classification maps.
Figure 5The structure of DCNN based on full wavelengths.