| Literature DB >> 29162881 |
Xuping Feng1, Cheng Peng2, Yue Chen3, Xiaodan Liu1, Xujun Feng4, Yong He5.
Abstract
Identifying individuals with target mutant phenotypes is a significant procedure in mutant exploitation for implementing genome editing technology in a crop breeding programme. In the present study, a rapid and non-invasive method was proposed to identify CRISPR/Cas9-induced rice mutants from their acceptor lines (huaidao-1 and nanjing46) using hyperspectral imaging in the near-infrared (NIR) range (874.41-1733.91 nm) combined with chemometric analysis. The hyperspectral imaging data were analysed using principal component analysis (PCA) for exploratory purposes, and a support vector machine (SVM) and an extreme learning machine (ELM) were applied to build discrimination models for classification. Meanwhile, PCA loadings and a successive projections algorithm (SPA) were used for extracting optimal spectral wavelengths. The SVM-SPA model achieved best performance, with classification accuracies of 93% and 92.75% being observed for calibration and prediction sets for huaidao-1 and 91.25% and 89.50% for nanjing46, respectively. Furthermore, the classification of mutant seeds was visualized on prediction maps by predicting the features of each pixel on individual hyperspectral images based on the SPA-SVM model. The above results indicated that NIR hyperspectral imaging together with chemometric data analysis could be a reliable tool for identifying CRISPR/Cas9-induced rice mutants, which would help to accelerate selection and crop breeding processes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29162881 PMCID: PMC5698449 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16254-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Means of shape features and thousand-grain weight (TGW) from the studied rice seeds.
| Rice varieties | Area in pixels | Perimeter in pixels | length in pixels | Width in pixels | Thousand-grain weight (TGW) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT of huaidao-1 | 61.31 ± 6.32b | 29.43 ± 1.53b | 11.20 ± 0.61b | 5.65 ± 0.44 | 24.56 ± 0.64b | |
| Mutants of huaidao-1 | 65.28 ± 6.29a | 30.95 ± 1.65a | 11.76 ± 0.62a | 5.73 ± 0.37 | 25.99 ± 0.61a | |
| WT of nanjing46 | 54.73 ± 5.90b | 27.96 ± 1.62b | 10.34 ± 0.61b | 5.33 ± 0.45 | 25.66 ± 0.54b | |
| Mutants of nanjing46 | 55.88 ± 7.99a | 28.18 ± 2.47a | 10.85 ± 0.72a | 5.36 ± 0.41 | 26.25 ± 0.30a | |
Different letters denote significant differences between wild-type (WT) and CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutants (small letters) by Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05). Values are presented as the means ± SD.
Figure 1Profiles for raw spectra (A,C) and average spectra (B,D) of wild-type (WT) and CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutants from huaidao-1 (A,B) and nanjing46 (C,D) rice seeds. The shaded area represents the standard deviation in each wavelength.
Figure 2Three-dimensional (3D) principal component score plots of the first three PCs based on the average spectrum of each sample. (A: huaidao-1; B: nanjing46).
Sensitive wavelengths selected by SPA and PCA-loadings.
| Method | Rice varieties | Number | Optimal wavelengths/nm |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPA | Huaidao-1 | 12 | 1011.93; 122.81; 1227.12; 1314.72; 1345.06; 1402.42; 1439.55; 1483.46; 1581.51; 1611.96; 1642.43; 1645.82 |
| Nanjing46 | 11 | 1122.81; 1200.19; 1227.12; 1314.72; 1345.06; 1372.05; 1405.79; 1439.55; 1507.12; 1581.51; 1645.82 | |
| PCA-loadings | Huaidao-1 | 8 | 1122.81; 1200.19; 1227.12; 1247.33; 1314.72; 1402.42; 1459.81; 1581.51; |
| Nanjing46 | 8 | 1122.81; 1200.19; 1227.12; 1247.33; 1314.72; 1402.42; 1459.81; 1581.51 |
Discrimination results of different models for differentiating WT and CRISPR/Cas9-induced rice mutants based on full wavelengths and optimal wavelengths.
| Rice varieties | Discrimination model | Model build on full wavelength | Model build on optimal wavelength selected by SPA | Model build on optimal wavelength selected by PCA-loadings | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parametera | Calibration set | Prediction set | Parameter | Calibration set | Prediction set | Parameter | Calibration set | Prediction set | ||
| Huaidao-1 | SVM | 256, 3.0314 | 92.38% | 92.5% | 256, 48.5029 | 93% | 92.75% | 256, 84.4485 | 86.13% | 81% |
| ELM | 28 | 90.25% | 93.25% | 9 | 91.37% | 92% | 64 | 83.38% | 81.25% | |
| Nanjing46 | SVM | 256, 3.0314 | 89.75% | 88% | 256, 84.4485 | 91.25% | 89.50% | 256, 27.8576 | 80.5%% | 76.50% |
| ELM | 35 | 88.62% | 90.25% | 14 | 88.75% | 90% | 35 | 80.13% | 80.75% | |
apar indicates the parameters of the discrimination models, (c,g) for SVM, the optimum number of hidden nodes for ELM.
Figure 3Visual prediction map based on the SPA-SVM model as predictors. The colours (olive: huaidao-1 WT rice seeds; orange: huaidao-1 CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutant rice seeds; pink: nanjing46 WT rice seeds; navy; nanjing46 CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutant rice seeds) correspond to objects identified as class members.
Figure 4Using CRISPR/Cas 9 to edit the TWG6 gene. (A) The schematic diagram of the vector used in this study. pOsU3: U3 promoter; chimeric: gRNA + target; pOsUBQ1/Ubi1: UBI promoter; SpCsn1: Cas9 protein; Nos: Nos terminater. (B) The sequence of the TGW6, the sequence of target site has been labeled by the red colour. (C) DNA PCR analysis and sequencing results from huaidao-1 and nanjing46 rice wild-type and mutants.There are 3 bp and 2 bp missing in TGW6 gene-edited mutants of huaidao-1 and nanjing46, respectively.
Figure 5Flowchart of image processing and data analysis for discrimination of CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutants of rice.