Proteins fold into a single structural ensemble but can also misfold into many diverse structures including small aggregates and fibrils, which differ in their toxicity. The aggregate surface properties play an important role in how they interact with the plasma membrane and cellular organelles, potentially inducing cellular toxicity, however, these properties have not been measured to date due to the lack of suitable methods. Here, we used a spectrally resolved, super-resolution imaging method combined with an environmentally sensitive fluorescent dye to measure the surface hydrophobicity of individual aggregates formed by the protein α-synuclein (αS), whose aggregation is associated with Parkinson's disease. We show that the surface of soluble oligomers is more hydrophobic than fibrils and populates a diverse range of coexisting states. Overall, our data show that the conversion of oligomers to fibril-like aggregates and ultimately to fibrils results in a reduction in both hydrophobicity and the variation in hydrophobicity. This funneling characteristic of the energy landscape explains many of the observed properties of αS aggregates and may be a common feature of aggregating proteins.
Proteins fold into a single structural ensemble but can also misfold into many diverse structures including small aggregates and fibrils, which differ in their toxicity. The aggregate surface properties play an important role in how they interact with the plasma membrane and cellular organelles, potentially inducing cellular toxicity, however, these properties have not been measured to date due to the lack of suitable methods. Here, we used a spectrally resolved, super-resolution imaging method combined with an environmentally sensitive fluorescent dye to measure the surface hydrophobicity of individual aggregates formed by the protein α-synuclein (αS), whose aggregation is associated with Parkinson's disease. We show that the surface of soluble oligomers is more hydrophobic than fibrils and populates a diverse range of coexisting states. Overall, our data show that the conversion of oligomers to fibril-like aggregates and ultimately to fibrils results in a reduction in both hydrophobicity and the variation in hydrophobicity. This funneling characteristic of the energy landscape explains many of the observed properties of αS aggregates and may be a common feature of aggregating proteins.
Entities:
Keywords:
Nile red; Super-resolution spectroscopy; alpha-synuclein; hydrophobicity; protein aggregation; spectral imaging
The aggregation
of monomeric
proteins into small soluble oligomers, and ultimately insoluble β-sheet-rich
fibrils, plays a key role in several neurodegenerative disorders,
including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and prion diseases.
A number of studies have shown that small aggregates present in solution,
oligomers, are the main cytotoxic species,[1,2] while
fibrils are capable of seeding aggregation and spreading from cell
to cell in the brain.[3] There have been
significant advances in understanding the structure of fibrils of
amyloid-β (Aβ) and α-synuclein (αS) in vitro[4,5] and in cells,[6−8] and measurement by atomic force microscopy and electron
microscopy of the aggregates formed during this process.[9−11] However, very little is known about the surface properties of these
aggregates despite the fact that surface properties will determine
how aggregates interact with cell membranes and cellular components
and hence may play a key role in the mechanism by which aggregates
are toxic to cells. In particular, the surface hydrophobicity of the
protein aggregates associated with the neurodegenerative diseases
is thought to be central to their toxicity,[12] since more hydrophobic aggregates will bind more strongly to membranes
and cellular organelles.We have previously studied the aggregation
of αS, a major
constituent of Lewy bodies and the pathological hallmark of Parkinson’s
disease,[13] covalently coupled a donor
or acceptor fluorophore using single-molecule Förster resonance
energy transfer (FRET) measurements and kinetic modeling.[1,14] We identified three species: (1) low FRET oligomers, which were
easily degradable by proteinase K (PK), and convert into (2) high
FRET, PK resistant and more toxic oligomers, which then convert to
(3) fibril-like high FRET oligomers that grow into fibrils. However,
these experiments did not provide any information on the surface properties
of aggregates. More recently we developed a multidimensional super-resolution
imaging method, simultaneously recording the spatial position and
fluorescence emission spectrum of the solvatochromic dye, Nile Red
(NR),[15] which nonspecifically and transiently
binds to protein aggregates.[16] This method,
termed spectrally resolved PAINT (Points Accumulation for Imaging
in Nanoscale Topography) or sPAINT,[17] allows
for simultaneous measurement of the morphology/size and relative surface
hydrophobicity of individual protein aggregates. We have previously
demonstrated that sPAINT can detect hydrophobic differences in a variety
of protein aggregates with different morphologies.[17]Here, we use sPAINT imaging with NR in combination
with imaging
the benzothiazole derivative Thioflavin T (ThT) , a fluorescent dye
that binds to the cross-β feature of amyloid structures,[1,18] to individually characterize the protein aggregates formed during
the aggregation of αS (Figure a–c) and follow the changes in surface hydrophobicity.
By observing NR-bound αS aggregates, this approach allows us
to image and measure the surface hydrophobicity of the individual
protein aggregates formed during an aggregation reaction even before
they become ThT active. NR is an uncharged amphiphilic oxazine whose
fluorescence absorption and emission spectra are, broadly, sensitive
to the local polarity but there is also a contribution from local
hydrogen and π-bonding to the observed spectral shift. The exact
mechanism that gives rise to the spectral shift is still being studied.[19,20] The quantum yield of the NR dye increases with hydrophobicity and
previous experiments[17] on model liposomes
with different hydrophobicities showed that this altered the localization
probability but not the observed spectral distribution. In this study,
we have used NR to super-resolve the relative changes in surface
hydrophobicity when aggregates of αS increase in size from ∼30
nm to >1 μm long fibrils during an aggregation reaction.
Furthermore,
our methods can measure how the peak spectral emission varies from
one aggregate to another (Figure d) as well as how much the hydrophobicity of a single
aggregate varies by measuring the width of the distribution of the
individual sPAINT localizations, thereby determining the range of
hydrophobic states available not only between single aggregates but
within them as well.
Figure 1
Schematic representation of sPAINT experiment to probe
surface
hydrophobicity of alpha-synuclein (αS) aggregates. (a) Unlabeled
αS monomers, shown as gray spheres, were incubated under conditions
favoring their aggregation into oligomers and ultimately amyloid fibrils.
Aliquots were taken, diluted, and imaged using sPAINT. (b) Molecular
structure of Thioflavin T (ThT) and Nile Red (NR) dyes used to probe
the β-sheet content and surface hydrophobicity of αS aggregates,
respectively. The fluorescence quantum yield of ThT increases upon
binding to the β- sheet structure of aggregates (represented
by the blue colored aggregates). αS oligomers or fibrils were
then probed for hydrophobicity and false-colored by NR. (c) Schematic
of the setup used for the single-molecule sPAINT experiments; single-molecule
fluorescence is collected by a high numerical aperture objective lens
and passed through a blazed transmission diffraction grating. The
fluorescence emission is divided into the spatial region (0th diffraction
order) and the spectral region (1st diffraction order) in the image
plane and recorded by an EMCCD camera. 405 and 532 nm lasers are used
to sequentially excite the dyes ThT and NR, respectively. (d) sPAINT
data terminology: (Upper) Hydrophobicity histograms, cumulative frequency
histograms of mean wavelengths of individual αS aggregates.
The histogram is fitted to a Gaussian function and then the total
mean hydrophobicity value (x̅) and the total standard deviation (σt) are determined. (Middle) Hydrophobicity landscape, density plot
of the mean wavelength (x̅) and number of localizations
(n) of individual αS aggregates. The value
(x̅, n) of each colored-point
corresponds to the colored event in the hydrophobicity histogram.
(Bottom) Hydrophobicity heterogeneity, density plot of the mean wavelength
(x̅) and hydrophobicity variability (σ)
of individual αS aggregates. The value (x̅, σ) of each colored-point corresponds to the colored event
in the hydrophobicity histogram.
Schematic representation of sPAINT experiment to probe
surface
hydrophobicity of alpha-synuclein (αS) aggregates. (a) Unlabeled
αS monomers, shown as gray spheres, were incubated under conditions
favoring their aggregation into oligomers and ultimately amyloid fibrils.
Aliquots were taken, diluted, and imaged using sPAINT. (b) Molecular
structure of Thioflavin T (ThT) and Nile Red (NR) dyes used to probe
the β-sheet content and surface hydrophobicity of αS aggregates,
respectively. The fluorescence quantum yield of ThT increases upon
binding to the β- sheet structure of aggregates (represented
by the blue colored aggregates). αS oligomers or fibrils were
then probed for hydrophobicity and false-colored by NR. (c) Schematic
of the setup used for the single-molecule sPAINT experiments; single-molecule
fluorescence is collected by a high numerical aperture objective lens
and passed through a blazed transmission diffraction grating. The
fluorescence emission is divided into the spatial region (0th diffraction
order) and the spectral region (1st diffraction order) in the image
plane and recorded by an EMCCD camera. 405 and 532 nm lasers are used
to sequentially excite the dyes ThT and NR, respectively. (d) sPAINT
data terminology: (Upper) Hydrophobicity histograms, cumulative frequency
histograms of mean wavelengths of individual αS aggregates.
The histogram is fitted to a Gaussian function and then the total
mean hydrophobicity value (x̅) and the total standard deviation (σt) are determined. (Middle) Hydrophobicity landscape, density plot
of the mean wavelength (x̅) and number of localizations
(n) of individual αS aggregates. The value
(x̅, n) of each colored-point
corresponds to the colored event in the hydrophobicity histogram.
(Bottom) Hydrophobicity heterogeneity, density plot of the mean wavelength
(x̅) and hydrophobicity variability (σ)
of individual αS aggregates. The value (x̅, σ) of each colored-point corresponds to the colored event
in the hydrophobicity histogram.
Results
sPAINT Can
Follow Changes in the Hydrophobicity of Individual
Aggregates During αS Aggregation
We carried out an
aggregation reaction of unlabeled 70 μM αS protein incubated
at 37 °C with agitation at 200 rpm and extracted aliquots at
different time-points (1, 3, 9, 24, and 48 h) for imaging using ThT
and sPAINT. Figure a shows representative sPAINT hydrophobicity images of the αS
aggregates at different times. The morphology of the aggregates changed
from globular/spherical particles (hereby defined as “oligomeric”
species) to elongated species (hereby defined as “fibrillar”
species). In parallel to these morphological changes, the emission
spectra of the aggregates shifted to longer wavelengths (represented
as a shift in color of the hydrophobicity images from green to yellow).
This suggests that the aggregates at the late stages, the fibrillar
species, have less solvent accessible hydrophobic patches than early
stage aggregates. To compare the hydrophobicity of aggregates as a
function of time, we constructed the histograms of hydrophobicity
by extracting the mean wavelength for each aggregate at every time-point
(Figure b). The non-ThT
active species show a small shift in the peak maxima of ∼10
nm with time. This size of this shift is comparable to the standard
deviations of the histograms, whereas there is a larger shift in the
maximum hydrophobicity by around 20 nm for the ThT active species
over 24 h, to less hydrophobic fibrillar species. This observation
clearly suggests that the aggregate surface changes with time. To
gain further information on the hydrophobicity of the aggregates,
we created density-plots, referred to as hydrophobicity landscapes
in Figure c, in which
the mean wavelength (x̅) was plotted on the X-axis and the number of localizations (n) on the Y-axis. The values of x̅ and n were determined by all the individual sPAINT
localizations of individual αS aggregates. The mean wavelength
(x̅) represents the mean hydrophobicity of
single aggregates. For the non-ThT active species in Figure c, there was no clear change
in the hydrophobicity landscape with time, representing a broad population.
In contrast, the hydrophobicity landscape of ThT active aggregates
showed a clear change and a shift in aggregate population after 24
h. These plots suggest that the species at the early stages of aggregation,
oligomeric species, are more hydrophobic, and structurally distinct
from fibrils.
Figure 2
Spectral analysis of 70 μM αS aggregation
by sPAINT.
(a) Representative sPAINT hydrophobicity images of single ThT active
αS aggregates at different time-points (1h, 3h, 9h, 24h, and
48 h) with a hydrophobicity scale. Scale bar is 100 nm in 1, 3, 9,
and upper 24 h, and 1 μm in bottom 24 and 48 h. (b) Total hydrophobicity
populations of non- ThT active and ThT active αS species (1
h, N(non-ThT) = 551, N(ThT) = 119; 3 h, N(non-ThT) = 1,091, N(ThT) = 334; 9 h, N(non-ThT) = 1,143, N(ThT) = 401; 24 h, N(non-ThT) = 1,094, N(ThT) = 820; 48 h, N(non-ThT) = 502, N(ThT) = 538). (c) Hydrophobicity
landscapes of individual aggregates at the different time-points with
a density scale. (Lookup table: population density) (d) The number
of αS species per μm2 as a function of time.
These data correspond to the mean and standard deviation of five
independent experiments. (e) PK digestion assays of a 2 day αS
aggregation. The fraction of the number of αS species in the
PK-exposed sample (1 h) was divided by the number of αS species
in the initial sample (total number of αS species: N(non-ThT) = 90, N(ThT) = 185). These data correspond to the mean and standard deviation
of three independent experiments.
Spectral analysis of 70 μM αS aggregation
by sPAINT.
(a) Representative sPAINT hydrophobicity images of single ThT active
αS aggregates at different time-points (1h, 3h, 9h, 24h, and
48 h) with a hydrophobicity scale. Scale bar is 100 nm in 1, 3, 9,
and upper 24 h, and 1 μm in bottom 24 and 48 h. (b) Total hydrophobicity
populations of non- ThT active and ThT active αS species (1
h, N(non-ThT) = 551, N(ThT) = 119; 3 h, N(non-ThT) = 1,091, N(ThT) = 334; 9 h, N(non-ThT) = 1,143, N(ThT) = 401; 24 h, N(non-ThT) = 1,094, N(ThT) = 820; 48 h, N(non-ThT) = 502, N(ThT) = 538). (c) Hydrophobicity
landscapes of individual aggregates at the different time-points with
a density scale. (Lookup table: population density) (d) The number
of αS species per μm2 as a function of time.
These data correspond to the mean and standard deviation of five
independent experiments. (e) PK digestion assays of a 2 day αS
aggregation. The fraction of the number of αS species in the
PK-exposed sample (1 h) was divided by the number of αS species
in the initial sample (total number of αS species: N(non-ThT) = 90, N(ThT) = 185). These data correspond to the mean and standard deviation
of three independent experiments.
αS Aggregates at Lower Concentration Undergo Slow Changes
in Surface Hydrophobicity
Next we incubated αS at a
low monomer concentration (1 μM) at 37 °C, closer to physiological
conditions, over a month (1 day, 1 week, and 1 month). We then imaged
the aggregates formed using sPAINT. Surprisingly, we observed slow
surface structural changes over this period of time (Figure a), with the formation of more
hydrophobic aggregates in both non-ThT and ThT active species (Figure b and c). This result
suggests that the aggregates undergo slow conformational changes that
lead to the formation of more hydrophobic aggregates compared to the
aggregation reaction of 70 μM αS (the population to the
left of the red line at 610 nm in Figure b, the mean hydrophobicity of the aggregates
at the early stages of 70 μM αS aggregation).
Figure 3
Spectral analysis
of 1 μM αS aggregation by sPAINT.
(a) Representative sPAINT hydrophobicity image of single ThT active
αS aggregates at different time-points (1day (1D), 1 week (1W),
and 1 month (1M)) with a hydrophobicity scale. Scale bar is 100 nm.
(b) Total hydrophobicity populations of non-ThT active and ThT active
αS species (1D, N(non-ThT) = 642, N(ThT) = 250; 1W, N(non-ThT) = 207, N(ThT) = 171; 1M, N(non-ThT) = 178, N(ThT) = 243. (c) Hydrophobicity landscapes of individual aggregates at
the different time-points with a density scale. (Lookup table: population
density.) (d) Number of αS species/μm2 as a
function of time. These data correspond to the mean and standard
deviation of three independent experiments. (e) PK digestion assays
with sPAINT of a 1 week αS aggregation. The fraction of the
number of αS species in the PK-exposed sample (1 h) was divided
by the number of αS species in the initial sample (Total number
of αS species: N(non-ThT) = 65, N(ThT) = 183). These data correspond
to the mean and standard deviation of three independent experiments.
(f) Ca2+ influx induced by aggregation mixture of 1 μM
αS proteins at the different time-points (1D, 1W, and 1M). The
error bars represent the standard deviation from more than 1000 aggregates
of one independent experiment.
Spectral analysis
of 1 μM αS aggregation by sPAINT.
(a) Representative sPAINT hydrophobicity image of single ThT active
αS aggregates at different time-points (1day (1D), 1 week (1W),
and 1 month (1M)) with a hydrophobicity scale. Scale bar is 100 nm.
(b) Total hydrophobicity populations of non-ThT active and ThT active
αS species (1D, N(non-ThT) = 642, N(ThT) = 250; 1W, N(non-ThT) = 207, N(ThT) = 171; 1M, N(non-ThT) = 178, N(ThT) = 243. (c) Hydrophobicity landscapes of individual aggregates at
the different time-points with a density scale. (Lookup table: population
density.) (d) Number of αS species/μm2 as a
function of time. These data correspond to the mean and standard
deviation of three independent experiments. (e) PK digestion assays
with sPAINT of a 1 week αS aggregation. The fraction of the
number of αS species in the PK-exposed sample (1 h) was divided
by the number of αS species in the initial sample (Total number
of αS species: N(non-ThT) = 65, N(ThT) = 183). These data correspond
to the mean and standard deviation of three independent experiments.
(f) Ca2+ influx induced by aggregation mixture of 1 μM
αS proteins at the different time-points (1D, 1W, and 1M). The
error bars represent the standard deviation from more than 1000 aggregates
of one independent experiment.To test if this slow conversion is biologically important,
we measured
the ability of these aggregates to permeabilize membranes and hence
allow the entry of calcium ions (Ca2+). To achieve this
we used 100 nm liposomes filled with Ca2+ sensitive dyes
that we have recently developed to measure aggregate toxicity.[2] We tethered thousands of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) vesicles (filled with
the Ca2+ sensitive dye Cal-520) onto glass coverslips via
biotin-neutravidin linkage. The addition of molecules that induce
membrane permeability allows the entry of Ca2+ into the
vesicles which leads to a change in the localized fluorescence intensity
of the dye in the vesicles that can be detected with total internal
reflection microscopy (TIRFM). We incubated the vesicles with Ca2+ containing L15 buffer before we added aggregates formed
at different time points (1 day, 1 week, and 1 month) to the vesicles.
We observed a significant increase in membrane permeability (toxicity)
between aggregates formed after 1 week and 1 month compared to 1 day
of 1 μM protein aggregation (Figure f), which correlates with the increase in
the number of ThT active species (the population in the left of red
line in Figure b).
This suggests that these ThT active species, which still have an increased
hydrophobic surface, are predominantly responsible for inducing membrane
permeabilization and the formation of these aggregates would need
to be inhibited before the slow conversion to prevent increased damage
to cells. This result is consistent with a recent study of two populations
of enriched oligomers which identified that membrane disruption was
caused a highly lipophilic element, promoting strong membrane interactions
and a structured region that inserts into lipid bilayers and disrupts
their integrity.[21]
The Surface of αS
Oligomers is Different from αS
Fibrils
To better characterize the aggregates formed, we
plotted the hydrophobicity landscape for all the species observed
during the aggregation reaction of 70 μM αS proteins (Figure a). This plot shows
that there is one species (A) that is not ThT active and two species
(B and C) that are ThT active. The non-ThT active species are formed
first, corresponding to the low FRET species observed previously,[1,14] and do not change in morphology during the aggregation; they are
very diverse in hydrophobicity and number of localizations, suggesting
they exist in a range of different structures. The ThT active species
become prominent after 9 h, corresponding to the high FRET, more toxic
oligomers we previously observed. The ratio of ThT active to non-ThT
active increases from 18% to 50% as the reaction proceeds in good
agreement with our kinetic model.[14] After
24 h, the ThT active species are less hydrophobic and less diverse
in surface structure (Figure b; 1 h, 3 h, and 9 h, x̅ = ∼610 ± 0.6 nm, σ = ∼10 ± 0.5 nm; 24 and 48 h x̅ = ∼635 ±
0.5 nm, σ = ∼5 ± 0.4
nm) corresponding to high FRET fibril-like oligomers and fibrils.
Overall, these data qualitatively agree very well with our previous
kinetic model,[14] although a direct quantitative
comparison was not possible. The population of aggregates on the surface
does not directly correlate to that in solution due to differences
in surface binding as previously observed with Aβ.[22] However, the qualitative agreement shows that
all the main oligomeric species that are formed in solution also bind
to the surface and are imaged in our experiment. In contrast to the
types of aggregates observed during the aggregation reaction of 70
μM αS, there seem to be only two species present when
we incubated αS at 1 μM concentration (Figure c). The high FRET fibril-like
oligomers were absent, suggesting that these are formed from the more
hydrophobic ThT active oligomers at higher protein concentrations.
Interestingly, the species formed at 1 μM concentration showed
a wider range of variation in surface hydrophobicity, including more
hydrophobic species, than those formed during an aggregation reaction
using 70 μM αS proteins.
Figure 4
Probing hydrophobicity changes between
non-ThT active and ThT active
αS species (a) Hydrophobicity landscapes of non-ThT active and
ThT active species from all time points for the 70 μM αS
aggregation. (Lookup table: population density.) (b) Cartoon showing
αS protein aggregation; each αS species in (A), (B), and
(C) corresponds to the αS species indicated by the area in a
white circle area in (a). (A) Non-ThT active small oligomers, (B)
ThT active, β-sheet rich larger oligomers, and (C) ThT active, β-sheet
rich fibrils.
Probing hydrophobicity changes between
non-ThT active and ThT active
αS species (a) Hydrophobicity landscapes of non-ThT active and
ThT active species from all time points for the 70 μM αS
aggregation. (Lookup table: population density.) (b) Cartoon showing
αS protein aggregation; each αS species in (A), (B), and
(C) corresponds to the αS species indicated by the area in a
white circle area in (a). (A) Non-ThT active small oligomers, (B)
ThT active, β-sheet rich larger oligomers, and (C) ThT active, β-sheet
rich fibrils.
Size Analysis and Proteinase
K Digestion Assay Identify Structural
Differences between Non-ThT Active and ThT Active αS Species
We also examined the size of the species formed during these experiments
by directly measuring the aggregate size from the super-resolution
fluorescence images with an experimentally determined localization
precision of around 10 nm at typical detected photon numbers (∼700
photons, Supporting Information Figure 1). In particular, we measured the size of diffraction-limited aggregates,
which could correspond to the oligomeric species (Supporting Information Figures 2 and 3) by calculating a full width
half-maximum (fwhm) from the standard deviation of a two-dimensional
Gaussian fit. Aggregates with a wide range of sizes are formed and
the non-ThT active species were on average smaller than the ThT active
species, 60 ± 2.6 and 80 ± 5.5 nm, for non-ThT and ThT active
species, respectively (p = 0.05 by t test), which is consistent with the model that the non-ThT active
species convert and grow into the ThT active species.To correlate
our measurements of hydrophobicity with aggregate structure, we determined
the PK resistance of the aggregates formed after a 2 day incubation
of 70 μM αS proteins, which contains a mixture of all
aggregate surface structures (Figure e). We imaged the aggregates on a glass coverslip surface
and exposed the aggregates to PK for 1 h at 37 °C. We then reimaged
the same field of view and measured the fraction of fluorescent puncta
that remained detectable. We found that the non-ThT species were most
PK sensitive (85% of aggregates were degraded), as might be expected
due to lack of detectable β-sheet regions. Interestingly, the
aggregates formed at 1 μM concentration are slightly less PK
sensitive compared to the aggregates at 70 μM concentration
(Figure e), which
is consistent with our observation of the formation of more hydrophobic
aggregates, which could have more β-sheet structures, in both
non-ThT and ThT active species at 1 μM. These data show that
the different aggregates detected by sPAINT also have different structural
properties.
The Surface of αS Oligomers Varies
in Hydrophobicity More
than αS Mature Fibrils
We also measured the distribution
of sPAINT spectral shifts observed from individual aggregates. Control
experiments showed that the measured width of the distribution of
sPAINT spectral shifts of αS aggregates was due to the variation
in the hydrophobicity of the individual aggregates, not the measurement[17] (Supporting Information Figures 4–6). Using the measured standard deviation
of the spectral positions of individual αS aggregates, we plotted
the hydrophobicity heterogeneity, mean hydrophobicity versus hydrophobicity
variability, for all the species observed during the aggregation reaction
of 70 μM αS proteins (Figure a and b). There are three distinct αS
species present, in agreement with the results shown in Figure . We then compared the heterogeneity
of individual oligomers and mature fibrils. We defined mature fibrils
as ThT active aggregates with a mean wavelength over 630 nm, and ellipticity
less than 0.2 because these species does not appear in non-ThT active
species and at the early stage of the aggregation (Supporting Information Figure 3). We have also measured the hydrophobicity
of mature fibrils formed in the aggregation of 70 μM αS
proteins after 168 h (Supporting Information Figure 7). The total mean hydrophobicity and standard deviation of
the mature fibrils of 168 h are around 633 and 4 nm, respectively
(Supporting Information Figure 7a), and
show a clearly well-defined feature in the hydrophobicity landscape
and hydrophobicity heterogeneity (Supporting Information Figure 7b and c). This feature matches that observed
at the later stages of 70 μM αS protein aggregation, confirming
that it is due to fibril formation. We found that on average individual
oligomers have a significantly larger spectral width than individual
fibrils, and the variation in these widths for oligomers is also larger
than fibrils (Figure c, p < 0.0001 by t test). To
determine the distribution of wavelength values one would expect from
NR in a well-defined environment within our imaging system, we performed
a (photon matched) control experiment using β-lactoglobulin
(βLG), a well-structured protein. Any distribution whose width
is larger than that measured for βLG arises from the heterogeneity
in the structure of the protein aggregates, and not the instrumentation.
Previous studies using βLG, which exists as a dimer at room
temperature and neutral pH and binds to NR,[15] have shown that the peak maximum of the emission spectrum of NR-bound
βLG at the ensemble level is around 600 nm, which is consistent
with our sPAINT results of βLG (Supporting Information Figure 8). We observed a narrower spectral width
of βLG (6 ± 0.6 nm, Supporting Information Figure 8a) than for the αS aggregates (more
than 10 ± 0.5 nm for the aggregates at the early stages and bimodal
distributions for the aggregates at the later stages in Figures b and 3b). This indicates that the broader spectral population of αS
aggregates, in particular with the aggregates at the early stages,
is due to the variations of the individual aggregate surfaces, not
the lower number of NR localizations with the aggregates at the early
stages or a technical artifact/limitation of the instrumentation.
Overall, this result shows that individual oligomers have a larger
variation in their surface hydrophobicity and hence surface structure
than fibrils, and also that their average surface structure is more
diverse, as reflected in the hydrophobicity landscapes.
Figure 5
(a) Hydrophobicity
heterogeneity (mean hydrophobicity versus hydrophobicity
variability) of non-ThT active and ThT active species from all time
points for the 70 μM αS aggregation. (Lookup table: population
density). (b) Histogram of hydrophobicity variability at 610 nm through
the center of (A) and (B) and at 633 nm through the center of (C)
using the data in Figure a. (c) Mean and standard deviation (error bars) of the hydrophobicity
variability of oligomeric species at early stages (non-ThT active
and ThT active species) and ThT active mature fibrillar species at
later-stages with a mean hydrophobicity over 630 nm and ellipticity
less than 0.2. The measured width of oligomeric species is larger
than that of mature fibrillar species (p < 0.0001
by t test).
(a) Hydrophobicity
heterogeneity (mean hydrophobicity versus hydrophobicity
variability) of non-ThT active and ThT active species from all time
points for the 70 μM αS aggregation. (Lookup table: population
density). (b) Histogram of hydrophobicity variability at 610 nm through
the center of (A) and (B) and at 633 nm through the center of (C)
using the data in Figure a. (c) Mean and standard deviation (error bars) of the hydrophobicity
variability of oligomeric species at early stages (non-ThT active
and ThT active species) and ThT active mature fibrillar species at
later-stages with a mean hydrophobicity over 630 nm and ellipticity
less than 0.2. The measured width of oligomeric species is larger
than that of mature fibrillar species (p < 0.0001
by t test).
Discussion
The changes observed in the surface hydrophobicity
during aggregation suggest intriguing connections between the underlying
structural transformations and self-organization phenomena previously
characterized for atomic and molecular clusters, protein folding,
and crystallization.[23] Systems that exhibit
efficient relaxation to a well-defined structure are characterized
by potential energy landscapes organized so that relaxation is guided
toward the global minimum.[24−26] Self-organization occurs when
there is a well-defined global potential energy minimum, connected
to higher local minima by low downhill energy barriers.[23] The landscape is then “unfrustrated”,[27,28] since there are no competing low energy morphologies separated from
the target structure by high barriers. Although it is important not
to overinterpret the changes in hydrophobicity, it is instructive
to formulate a prediction for the structure of the underlying energy
landscape that is consistent with the present results.Relaxation
on a funnelled potential energy landscape is driven by lowering the
potential energy at the expense of reducing the entropy. There is
a range of temperature where this first orderlike transition corresponds
to a well-defined, kinetically accessible, free energy minimum. The
systematic changes observed for the ThT active population in terms
of the x̅ and n of the hydrophobicity
probe are suggestive of an underlying energy landscape with funneling
properties that leads to more compact β-sheet structures and
less variation in surface hydrophobicity. For an aggregate of given
size, we would expect conformations with better packing to have lower
potential energy. We would also expect the number of configurations
compatible with more compact structures to diminish as the structure
becomes more ordered, which corresponds to a reduction in the landscape
entropy.[29] The time scales involved for
the ThT active aggregates to achieve a more uniform hydrophobicity
are compatible with the rates calculated for rearrangements of amyloidogenic
peptide dimers. In particular, for the amyloidogenic heptapeptide
GNNQQNY several alternative dimer arrangements are predicted
to form rapidly, probably compatible with a “dock and lock”
mechanism.[30−32] However, the interconversion paths that lead to the
cross β-sheet structure correspond to time scales of hours to
days at 300 K.[33] The present results suggest
that the energy landscape for an αS aggregate has funneling
properties leading to a relatively homogeneous family of low-energy
ThT active structures. Relaxation would be guided by an energetic
driving force, subject to downhill barriers that correspond to time
scales in the order of hours to days, and the energy landscape may
be similar for other aggregating proteins, given that they form structurally
similar fibrils. This observation suggests that initially there is
a range of structurally diverse oligomers with different surfaces,
and that in the case of αS they are more hydrophobic than at
later time-points. In contrast aggregates formed at later time points
are significantly less structurally diverse. Furthermore, when aggregation
occurs at lower protein concentration, relaxation is slower, and hence
a wider range of oligomer structures and properties can be formed
if left for longer times. These aggregates may be harder to remove
or more toxic, suggesting that it is important to remove aggregates
before they become more structurally diverse and failure to do this
may contribute to the development of neurodegenerative disease. A
funneling energy landscape with a reduction in structural diversity
as aggregation proceeds may also be a common feature of other aggregating
proteins.In conclusion, we have measured the surface hydrophobicity
of individual
αS protein aggregates, formed during an aggregation reaction,
using a multidimensional super-resolution imaging method. We have
found that the small soluble αS oligomers display a higher surface
hydrophobicity than mature fibrils and coexist in a wider range of
more hydrophobic states. Furthermore, individual oligomers show more
variation in surface hydrophobicity than individual fibrils. For the
first time, we have determined quantitatively the diversity of the
surfaces of αS protein aggregates at the single-aggregate level,
providing insights into how the surface properties and heterogeneity
of aggregates change as aggregation proceeds.
Authors: Phuong H Nguyen; Mai Suan Li; Gerhard Stock; John E Straub; D Thirumalai Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-12-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jonas Ries; Vinod Udayar; Alice Soragni; Simone Hornemann; K Peter R Nilsson; Roland Riek; Christoph Hock; Helge Ewers; Adriano A Aguzzi; Lawrence Rajendran Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 4.418
Authors: Gabriele S Kaminski Schierle; Sebastian van de Linde; Miklos Erdelyi; Elin K Esbjörner; Teresa Klein; Eric Rees; Carlos W Bertoncini; Christopher M Dobson; Markus Sauer; Clemens F Kaminski Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Marija Iljina; Gonzalo A Garcia; Mathew H Horrocks; Laura Tosatto; Minee L Choi; Kristina A Ganzinger; Andrey Y Abramov; Sonia Gandhi; Nicholas W Wood; Nunilo Cremades; Christopher M Dobson; Tuomas P J Knowles; David Klenerman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Serene W Chen; Srdja Drakulic; Emma Deas; Myriam Ouberai; Francesco A Aprile; Rocío Arranz; Samuel Ness; Cintia Roodveldt; Tim Guilliams; Erwin J De-Genst; David Klenerman; Nicholas W Wood; Tuomas P J Knowles; Carlos Alfonso; Germán Rivas; Andrey Y Abramov; José María Valpuesta; Christopher M Dobson; Nunilo Cremades Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M Rodrigues; P Bhattacharjee; A Brinkmalm; D T Do; C M Pearson; S De; A Ponjavic; J A Varela; K Kulenkampff; I Baudrexel; D Emin; F S Ruggeri; J E Lee; A R Carr; T P J Knowles; H Zetterberg; T N Snaddon; S Gandhi; S F Lee; D Klenerman Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 24.274
Authors: Phuong H Nguyen; Ayyalusamy Ramamoorthy; Bikash R Sahoo; Jie Zheng; Peter Faller; John E Straub; Laura Dominguez; Joan-Emma Shea; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Alfonso De Simone; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov; Saeed Najafi; Son Tung Ngo; Antoine Loquet; Mara Chiricotto; Pritam Ganguly; James McCarty; Mai Suan Li; Carol Hall; Yiming Wang; Yifat Miller; Simone Melchionna; Birgit Habenstein; Stepan Timr; Jiaxing Chen; Brianna Hnath; Birgit Strodel; Rakez Kayed; Sylvain Lesné; Guanghong Wei; Fabio Sterpone; Andrew J Doig; Philippe Derreumaux Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Plamena R Angelova; Minee L Choi; Alexey V Berezhnov; Mathew H Horrocks; Craig D Hughes; Suman De; Margarida Rodrigues; Ratsuda Yapom; Daniel Little; Karamjit S Dolt; Tilo Kunath; Michael J Devine; Paul Gissen; Mikhail S Shchepinov; Sergiy Sylantyev; Evgeny V Pavlov; David Klenerman; Andrey Y Abramov; Sonia Gandhi Journal: Cell Death Differ Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 15.828
Authors: Jason C Sang; Ji-Eun Lee; Alexander J Dear; Suman De; Georg Meisl; Alana M Thackray; Raymond Bujdoso; Tuomas P J Knowles; David Klenerman Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2019-03-25 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: Lisa-Maria Needham; Judith Weber; Colin M Pearson; Dung T Do; Felix Gorka; Guanpeng Lyu; Sarah E Bohndiek; Thomas N Snaddon; Steven F Lee Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 6.475