| Literature DB >> 30373282 |
Carina Barbosa Pereira1, Janosch Kunczik2, Leonie Zieglowski3, René Tolba4, Ahmed Abdelrahman5, Dietmar Zechner6, Brigitte Vollmar7, Heike Janssen8, Thomas Thum9,10, Michael Czaplik11.
Abstract
Animal research has always played a crucial role in various medical and scientific breakthroughs. They offer, inter alia, insights into diseases mechanisms, genetic predisposition to a disease, and drug therapy. However, the use of animals for medical research is a cause of major controversies and debates in modern science. To warrant high bioethical standards, new directives have been being adopted to replace animal research whenever possible, to reduce the number of animals, and to refine the procedures to minimize stress and pain. Here, we present two new approaches, based on thermal imaging (a remote and passive technology), to assess respiratory rate (RR) as well as exploratory behavior and general activity in rodents. In animal research, these parameters are gold standards for welfare assessment. The approaches were validated in a study conducted with both rats and mice. To test the feasibility of our algorithm to estimate RR, thermal videos from anesthetized rodents were acquired. The capability of the second approach to monitor activity was tested with videos of Open Field tests. Regarding RR, a high agreement between thermal imaging and gold standard (electrocardiography-derived RR) was achieved. The mean relative error averaged 0.50 ± 0.15 breaths/min and 4.55 ± 2.94 breaths/min for rats and mice, respectively. The second approach was capable of monitoring and tracking the activity of the rodents very well. This paper demonstrates that thermal imaging is a promising and relevant alternative for monitoring of RR and activity in rodents, thus contributing to the remote assessment of animal welfare.Entities:
Keywords: animal research; infrared thermography; locomotor activity; motion heat maps; remote monitoring; respiratory rate; thermal imaging; vital signs
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30373282 PMCID: PMC6263688 DOI: 10.3390/s18113653
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Schematic overview of the RR algorithm. (a) Selection of region of interest (ROI); (b) Detection and tracking of feature points; (c) Extraction of feature points’ trajectories; (d) Temporal filtering; (e) Blind source separation via principal component analysis (PCA); (f) Rank principal components (PCs) based on their variance; (g) Computation of frequency spectra and estimation of RR.
Figure 2Illustration of the measurement setup for RR assessment: (a) side view and (b) top view.
Figure 3Photo of the setup used for the OFTs in rats.
Results for RR estimation in thermal videos from rats.
| Rodent ID | Mean RR (Breaths/Min) | RMSE | Correlation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GS | TI | (Breaths/Min) | ||||
| R1 | 51.17 | 51.27 | 0.32 | 0.44 | 0.92 | 0.98 |
| R2 | 53.58 | 53.58 | 0.21 | 0.28 | 0.66 | 0.96 |
| R3 | 43.57 | 43.70 | 0.38 | 0.52 | 1.05 | 0.95 |
| R4 | 49.38 | 49.53 | 0.42 | 0.67 | 1.54 | 0.98 |
| R5 | 61.54 | 61.69 | 0.43 | 0.57 | 1.08 | 0.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GS—gold standard, TI—thermal image, —mean relative error, —90th percentile of the relative errors.
Figure 4Correlation plot (a) and Bland-Altman plot (b) comparing RR assessed using thermal imaging (RR) and RR assessed using ECG (RR); the plots comprise the data of all five rats. The former shows a R-squared of 0.967 and a sum of squared errors of 0.35 breaths/min. The latter demonstrates a bias of −0.11 breaths/min (solid line) and the 95 % limits of agreement vary between −0.79 breaths/min and 0.57 breaths/min (dashed lines).
Figure 5Estimated RRs. The solid line stands for the gold standard (RR derived from ECG), and the dashed line corresponds to the RR obtained with thermal imaging.
Results for RR estimation in thermal videos from mice.
| Rodent ID | Mean RR (Breaths/Min) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| GS | TI | ||
| M1 | 130.00 | 131.46 | 1.12 |
| M2 | 132.00 | 144.13 | 9.19 |
| M3 | 70.00 | 67.41 | 3.70 |
| M4 | 96.00 | 99.69 | 3.84 |
| M5 | 139.00 | 145.81 | 4.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
GS—gold standard, TI—thermal image, —mean relative error.
Figure 6Motion heat maps and logarithmic motion heat maps representing the cumulative time that the rodents spent in the different parts of the arena. Yellow denotes more time and blue less or no time. The time periods are given in seconds.