| Literature DB >> 32023963 |
Ziyi Xu1,2, Quchao Wang1,3, Duo Li4,5, Menghan Hu1,6, Nan Yao7, Guangtao Zhai5.
Abstract
Advancement in science and technology is playing an increasingly important role in solving difficult cases at present. Thermal cameras can help the police crack difficult cases by capturing the heat trace on the ground left by perpetrators, which cannot be spotted by the naked eye. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to establish a thermalfoot model using thermal imaging system to estimate the departure time. To this end, in the current work, we use a thermal camera to acquire the thermal sequence left on the floor, and convert it into the heat signal via image processing algorithm. We establish the model of thermalfoot print as we observe that the residual temperature would exponentially decrease with the departure time according to Newton's Law of Cooling. The correlation coefficients of 107 thermalfoot models derived from the corresponding 107 heat signals are basically above 0.99. In a validation experiment, a residual analysis is conducted and the residuals between estimated departure time points and ground-truth times are almost within a certain range from -150 s to +150 s. The reverse accuracy of the thermalfoot model for estimating departure time at one-third, one-half, two-thirds, three-fourths, four-fifths, and five-sixths capture time points are 71.96%, 50.47%, 42.06%, 31.78%, 21.70%, and 11.21%, respectively. The results of comparison experiments with two subjective evaluation methods (subjective 1: we directly estimate the departure time according to obtained local curves; subjective 2: we utilize auxiliary means such as a ruler to estimate the departure time based on obtained local curves) further demonstrate the effectiveness of thermalfoot model for detecting the departure time inversely. Experimental results also demonstrated that the thermalfoot model has good performance on the departure time reversal within a short time window someone leaves, whereas it is probably only approximately 15% to accurately determine the departure time via thermalfoot model within a long time window someone leaves. The influence of outliers, ROI (Region of Interest) selection, ROI size, different capture time points and environment temperature on the performance of thermalfoot model on departure time reversal can be explored in the future work. Overall, the thermalfoot model can help the police solve crimes to some extent, which in turn brings more guarantees for people's health, social security, and stability.Entities:
Keywords: Criminal investigation; Heat traces analysis; Newton’s Law of Cooling; Thermal imaging
Year: 2020 PMID: 32023963 PMCID: PMC7038398 DOI: 10.3390/s20030782
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Scheme of departure time estimation. (The pixel values are normalized.)
Figure 2Workflow of the proposed algorithm.
Figure 3Three typical thermal curves extracted from raw thermal videos.
Figure 4Normal distributions of starting points of exponential decline period (a) and lag time (b) in our dataset.
Figure 5One typical fitting result for exponential decline phase using Newton’s Law of Cooling.
Figure 6Residual for departure time at different points (N = 92) under the situation where the ground-truth departure time estimated by thermal footprint model: (a) one-third point, (b) one-half point, (c) two-thirds point, and (d) three-fourths point. (A total of 15 points with large deviations (>350 s) were eliminated).
Figure 7Residual for departure time at different points (N = 77) under the situation where the starting points of exponential decline period are estimated by statistical analysis: (a) one-third point, (b) one-half point, (c) two-thirds point, and (d) three-fourths point. (A total of 30 points with large deviations (>515 s) were eliminated).
Figure 8Accuracy of estimating departure time at the different capture time points.
Comparison with two subjective calculation methods. (Subjective calculation and subjective calculation indicate the experts do not use and use auxiliary means such as ruler, respectively.)
| Algorithm or Method | One-Third | One-Half | Two-Thirds | Three-Fourths | Four-Fifths | Five-Sixths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thermalfoot model | 71.96% | 50.47% | 42.06% | 31.78% | 21.70% | 11.21% |
| Subjective calculation | 58.89% | 37.38% | 34.58% | 23.36% | 23.36% | 11.21% |
| Subjective calculation | 62.62% | 40.19% | 36.45% | 32.71% | 28.04% | 12.15% |
Outlier ratio of two situations: known starting point and predicted starting point under ambient temperatures of 16 °C and 28 °C.
| Situation | 16 °C | 28 °C |
|---|---|---|
| Known starting point | 14.29% | 13.85% |
| Predicted starting point | 26.29% | 29.23% |
Figure 9Influence of ROI selection on generation of thermal curve: (a) possible ROI selection in the sole of foot; (b) thermal curves extracted from different ROIs; and (c) thermal curves extracted from the same ROI with various sizes. (The pixel values are normalized)
Figure 10Three original thermal curves and their temperature-corrected curves: (a–c) are types A–C, respectively.