| Literature DB >> 31286726 |
Carina Pereira1, Janosch Kunczik1, André Bleich2, Christine Haeger2, Fabian Kiessling1, Thomas Thum2, René Tolba1, Ute Lindauer1, Stefan Treue3,4, Michael Czaplik1.
Abstract
To refine animal research, vital signs, activity, stress, and pain must be monitored. In chronic studies, some measures can be assessed using telemetry sensors. Although this methodology provides high-precision data, an initial surgery for device implantation is necessary, potentially leading to stress, wound infections, and restriction of motion. Recently, camera systems have been adapted for animal research. We give an overview of parameters that can be assessed using imaging in the visible, near-infrared, and thermal spectrum of light. It focuses on heart activity, respiration, oxygen saturation, and motion, as well as on wound analysis. For each parameter, we offer recommendations on the minimum technical requirements of appropriate systems, regions of interest, and light conditions, among others. In general, these systems demonstrate great performance. For heart and respiratory rate, the error was <4 beats / min and 5 breaths/min. Furthermore, the systems are capable of tracking animals during different behavioral tasks. Finally, studies indicate that inhomogeneous temperature distribution around wounds might be an indicator of (pending) infections. In sum, camera-based techniques have several applications in animal research. As vital parameters are currently only assessed in sedated animals, the next step should be the integration of these modalities in home-cage monitoring.Entities:
Keywords: animal research; heart rate; motion activity; oxygen saturation; refinement; remote monitoring; respiratory rate; wound monitoring
Year: 2019 PMID: 31286726 PMCID: PMC6995877 DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.24.7.070601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Opt ISSN: 1083-3668 Impact factor: 3.170
Detailed overview of the imaging systems and properties to extract HR from four animal species: mice, rats, pig, and primates. Algorithmic approach (color-based or motion-based), ROIs, frame rate, spatial and thermal resolution, as well as required light conditions are specified.
| Technique approach | Visible | NIR | IRT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motion | Color | Motion | Color | Motion | |
| Species | Mice | Mice | Mice | Mice | Pigs |
| Rats | Rats | Rats | Rats | ||
| Pigs | Pigs | Pigs | Pigs | ||
| Primates | Primates | Primates | Primates | ||
| ROI | Chest/abdomen: all species | Shaved chest/abdomen: mice, rats | Chest/abdomen: all species | Shaved chest/abdomen: mice, rats | Chest: pigs |
| Head: primates | Tail: mice, rats | Head: primates | Tail: mice, rats | ||
| Pigs: snout, chest, abdomen | Pigs: snout, chest, abdomen | ||||
| | Face: primates | | Face: primates | ||
| Illumination | Visible light | Visible light | Active illumination (visible/IR light) (Power: e.g., 9 W) | Active illumination 940 nm (power: e.g., 9 W) | Not required |
| Frame rate | Mice: 60 Hz | ||||
| Rats: 60 Hz | |||||
| Pigs: 30 Hz | |||||
| Primates: 30 Hz | |||||
| Resolution | All species: at least | All species: at least | |||
| Temperature resolution | 0.03 K | ||||
Examples of imaging systems.
| Technique | Imaging systems |
|---|---|
| Visible | Mako G-223B (Allied Vision GmbH, Stadtroda, Germany) |
| IDS UI-3270LE/GV-5240/UI-5240 color (IDS GmbH, Obersulm, Germany) | |
| Grasshoper 3 GS3-U3-51S5C-C (FLIR Systems, Wilsonville, Oregon) | |
| Chameleon 3 U3-13Y3C (FLIR Systems, Wilsonville, Oregon) | |
| NIR | Manta G-223B NIR (Allied Vision GmbH, Stadtroda, Germany) |
| IDS UI-3270LE/GV-5240/UI-5240 NIR (IDS GmbH, Obersulm, Germany) | |
| Grasshoper 3 GS3-U3-41C6NIR-C (FLIR Systems, Wilsonville, Oregon) | |
| IRT | FLIR T1020 (FLIR Systems, Wilsonville, Oregon) |
| VarioCAM head 800 (InfraTec GmbH, Dresden, Germany) |
Detailed overview of the imaging systems and properties to extract RR from four animal species: mice, rats, pig, and primates. Algorithmic approach (color-based or motion-based), ROIs, frame rate, spatial and thermal resolution, as well as required light conditions are specified.
| Technique approach | Visible/NIR | IRT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motion | Motion | Color | |
| Species | Mice | Mice | Mice |
| Rats | Rats | Rats | |
| Pigs | Pigs | Pigs | |
| Primates | Primates | Primates | |
| ROI | Chest: all species | Chest: all species | Nostrils: all species |
| Abdomen: all species | Abdomen: all species | ||
| Back: all species | Back: all species | ||
| Illumination | Visible light | Not required | Not required |
| Frame rate | Mice: 30 Hz | ||
| Rats: 30 Hz | |||
| Pigs: 10 Hz | |||
| Primates: 10 Hz | |||
| Resolution | All species: at least | All species: at least: | |
| Temperature resolution | 0.03 K | ||
Accuracy of three imaging systems for assessment HR.
| Imaging systems | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visible | NIR | IRT | |||
| HR | Mice | 6 | — | — | |
| — | — | ||||
| — | — | ||||
| ROI, method | Thorax/abdomen, motion | — | — | ||
| Reference | Kunczik et al. (2019) | — | — | ||
| Rats | 6 | — | — | ||
| — | — | ||||
| — | — | ||||
| ROI, method | Thorax/abdomen, motion | — | — | ||
| Reference | Kunczik et al. (2019) | — | — | ||
| Pigs | — | Unknown | 17 | ||
| — | Unknown | ||||
| — | Unknown | ||||
| ROI, method | — | Snout, color | Thorax, motion | ||
| Observation | — | Good agreement | — | ||
| Reference | — | Blanik et al. (2019) | Pereira et al. (2019) | ||
| Nonhuman primates | 4 | — | — | ||
| 140 beats/min | — | — | |||
| — | — | ||||
| ROI, method | Face, color | — | — | ||
| Reference | Unakafov et al. (2018) | — | — | ||
Note: , mean heart rate; , mean root-mean-square error; , mean absolute error.
Accuracy of three imaging systems for assessment RR.
| Imaging systems | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visible | NIR | IRT | |||
| RR | Mice | 6 | — | 5 | |
| — | |||||
| — | – | ||||
| — | — | ||||
| ROI, method | Thorax/abdomen, motion | — | Thorax/abdomen, motion | ||
| Reference | Kunczik et al. (2019) | — | Pereira et al. (2018) | ||
| Rats | 6 | — | 5 | ||
| — | |||||
| — | |||||
| — | — | ||||
| ROI, method | Thorax/abdomen, motion | — | Thorax/abdomen, motion | ||
| Reference | Kunczik et al. (2019) | — | Pereira et al. (2018) | ||
| Pigs | — | Unknown | 17 | ||
| — | Unknown | ||||
| — | Unknown | ||||
| ROI, method | — | Snout, motion | Thorax, motion | ||
| Observation | — | Good agreement | — | ||
| Reference | — | Blanik et al. (2019) | Pereira et al. (2019) | ||
Note: , mean respiratory rate; , mean root-mean-square error; , mean absolute error.
Fig. 1(a) Bland–Altman plot comparing the HR estimated with visual imaging—using the motion-based approach—and the gold standard (ECG). The limits of agreement range from to 1.7 beats/min. The bias averages . (b) Regions of the rat used to extract HR.
Fig. 2(a) Bland–Altman plot comparing the RR estimated with IRT and the gold standard (ECG-derived RR). The limits of agreement range from to 0.6 breaths/min. The bias averages . (b) Thermogram of a rat and feature points used for motion tracking.
Fig. 3Superficial tissue imaging system for combined RGB reflectometry and laser speckle contrast analysis [superficial tissue imaging system (STIS) provided by Kohl-Bareis and Steimers, Biomedical Optics Laboratory, Rheinahrcampus Remagen, Germany]. Blood flow and blood oxygenation responses to 16-s electrical forepaw stimulation were recorded through a cranial window preparation (bone thinned to translucency) in isoflurane plus fentanyl anaesthetized rats. Laser speckle contrast, , and HHb-images were online calculated from raw images of speckle pattern and red, green, and blue LED-illumination images using STIS and stored at (LabVIEW 2010, National Instruments Inc.) for later offline calculation of cortical blood flow from speckle contrast.
Fig. 4(a) Thermogram of the open field arena. The animal is the hot spot in the image. (b) Motion heat map.
Fig. 5(a) and (b) Images of two laparotomy wounds. The lower images present, in addition, an IRT overlay showing the temperature distribution around the wound area in “false colors.”