Literature DB >> 30372127

Failure rates for stainless steel versus titanium alloy infrazygomatic crest bone screws: A single-center, randomized double-blind clinical trial.

Chris H Chang, Joshua S Lin, W Eugene Roberts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare failure rates for stainless steel (SS) and titanium alloy (TiA) bone screws (BSs) placed in the infrazygomatic crest (IZC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 386 consecutive patients (76 male, 310 female; mean age 24.3 years, range 10.3-59.4 years) received IZC BSs (SS or TiA) via a double-blind, split-mouth design. BSs penetrated attached gingiva (AG) or moveable mucosa (MM) with 5 mm of soft tissue clearance. All BSs were immediately loaded and reactivated monthly with ≤14 oz (397 g or 389 cN) applied directly to the upper archwire bilaterally for 6 months to retract the maxilla to correct Class II or bimaxillary protrusion.
RESULTS: Of the 772 devices, there were 49 (6.3%) failures: 27 SS (7.0%) and 22 TiA (5.7%). The 1.3% difference was not statistically significant ( P = .07). There was no significant relationship between SS or TiA failures relative to (1) right vs left side, (2) unilateral vs bilateral, or (3) age at failure. Significantly ( P < .05) increased failure rates were noted for SS screws in only two subgroups: AG site (7.4%) and right side (7.8%). Unilateral failure occurred in 21 patients (5.4%), and bilateral failures occurred in 14 of the total 772 patients (1.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: The overall success rate of 93.7% indicates that both SS and TiA are clinically acceptable for IZC BSs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone screws; Double blind; Infrazygomatic crest; Predisposition to failure; Randomized clinical trial; Skeletal anchorage; Split-mouth design; Stainless steel; Titanium alloy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30372127      PMCID: PMC8137128          DOI: 10.2319/012518-70.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  19 in total

1.  Immediate loading of implants used for orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  B Melsen; A Costa
Journal:  Clin Orthod Res       Date:  2000-02

2.  Sliding mechanics with microscrew implant anchorage.

Authors:  Hyo-Sang Park; Tae-Geon Kwon
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Effects of prestretching on force degradation of synthetic elastomeric chains.

Authors:  Kyung-Ho Kim; Chun-Hsi Chung; Kwnagchul Choy; Jeong-Sub Lee; Robert L Vanarsdall
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Mini- and micro-screws for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontic therapy.

Authors:  Axel Berens; Dirk Wiechmann; Rupert Dempf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Survival analyses of surgical miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  Nita Viwattanatipa; Sukalya Thanakitcharu; Akasith Uttraravichien; Waranuch Pitiphat
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Screw-type device diameter and orthodontic loading influence adjacent bone remodeling.

Authors:  Jonathan Christian Francis; Ulas Oz; Larry L Cunningham; Pinar Emecen Huja; Richard J Kryscio; Sarandeep S Huja
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Prognosis of primary and secondary insertions of orthodontic miniscrews: What we have learned from 500 implants.

Authors:  Shunsuke Uesugi; Satoshi Kokai; Zuisei Kanno; Takashi Ono
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Low quality evidence on the stability of orthodontic mini-implants.

Authors:  Reint Meursinge Reynders
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2013-09

Review 9.  Cutaneous and systemic hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants.

Authors:  Juliana L Basko-Plluska; Jacob P Thyssen; Peter C Schalock
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.845

10.  Genetic polymorphisms of NOS2 and predisposition to fracture non-union: A case control study based on Han Chinese population.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Kun Zhang; Yangjun Zhu; Zhan Wang; Zijun Li; Jun Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Stainless steel or titanium mini-implants?

Authors:  Paulo Mecenas; Daybelis Gonzalez Espinosa; Paula Coutinho Cardoso; David Normando
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Mechanical strength of stainless steel and titanium alloy mini-implants with different diameters: an experimental laboratory study.

Authors:  Sérgio Estelita Barros; Viviane Vanz; Kelly Chiqueto; Guilherme Janson; Eduardo Ferreira
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.750

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.