Literature DB >> 15529508

Sliding mechanics with microscrew implant anchorage.

Hyo-Sang Park1, Tae-Geon Kwon.   

Abstract

Three cases are illustrated. One was treated with maxillary microscrew implants, another with mandibular microscrew implants, and the third with both maxillary and mandibular microscrew implants. With the maxillary microscrew implants, the maxillary anterior teeth were retracted bodily with a slight intrusion and all the premolar extraction space was closed without loss of anchorage. Furthermore, the maxillary posterior teeth showed distal movement. The mandibular microscrew implants controlled the vertical position of the mandibular posterior teeth and played an important role in improving the facial profile. The efficacy of sliding mechanics with microscrew implant anchorage on the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion is also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15529508     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0703:SMWMIA>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  33 in total

1.  Mass retraction movement of the anterior upper teeth using orthodontic mini-implants as anchorage.

Authors:  Leonardo Henrique de Lima Araújo; Elton Gonçalves Zenóbio; Wellington Pacheco; Maurício Greco Cosso; Flávio Ricardo Manzi; Jamil Awad Shibli
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-01-28

2.  En-masse Retraction of the Maxillary Anterior Teeth by Applying Force from Four Different Levels - A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Chetan S; Kanhoba M Keluskar; Vikram N Vasisht; Siddharth Revankar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-09-20

3.  Failure rates for stainless steel versus titanium alloy infrazygomatic crest bone screws: A single-center, randomized double-blind clinical trial.

Authors:  Chris H Chang; Joshua S Lin; W Eugene Roberts
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion with Miniscrew Supported En-Masse Retraction: Is Deepbite Really an Obstacle for Extraction Treatment?

Authors:  Nilüfer İrem Tunçer; Ayça Arman Özçırpıcı
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-09-01

5.  Camouflage Treatment of a Severe Deep-Bite and Orthognathic Surgery Required Case with En Masse Retraction.

Authors:  Zeynep Büyükbayraktar; Cenk Doruk; Hasan Camcı
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-12-01

6.  Effectiveness of mini implants in three-dimensional control during retraction - a clinical study.

Authors:  Deepak Victor; Ramchandra Prabhakar; M K Karthikeyan; R Saravanan; P Vanathi; N Raj Vikram; P Adarsh Reddy; M Sudeepthi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-11-22

7.  Biomechanical influence of anchorages on orthodontic space closing mechanics by sliding method.

Authors:  Zhan Liu; Tinghui Sun; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  The use of mini-implants in en masse retraction for the treatment of bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.

Authors:  Ali Aljhani; Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2009-12-29

9.  Torque Loss in En-Masse Retraction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Miniimplants with Force Vectors at Different Levels: 3D FEM Study.

Authors:  Abhishek Parashar; Kaladhar Reddy Aileni; Madhukar Reddy Rachala; Nagam Reddy Shashidhar; Vankre Mallikarjun; Nupur Parik
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-12-05

10.  Patients' and orthodontists' perceptions of miniplates used for temporary skeletal anchorage: a prospective study.

Authors:  Marie A Cornelis; Nicole R Scheffler; Catherine Nyssen-Behets; Hugo J De Clerck; J F Camilla Tulloch
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.