Literature DB >> 30370279

Prediction of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients.

Mathieu Jozwiak1,2, Xavier Monnet1,2, Jean-Louis Teboul1,2.   

Abstract

Fluid administration is the first-line therapy in patients with acute circulatory failure. The main goal of fluid administration is to increase the cardiac output and ultimately the oxygen delivery. Nevertheless, the decision to administer fluids or not should be carefully considered, since half of critically ill patients are fluid unresponsive, and the deleterious effects of fluid overload clearly documented. Thus, except at the initial phase of hypovolemic or septic shock, where hypovolemia is constant and most of the patients responsive to the initial fluid resuscitation, it is of importance to test fluid responsiveness before administering fluids in critically ill patients. The static markers of cardiac preload cannot reliably predict fluid responsiveness, although they have been used for decades. To address this issue, some dynamic tests have been developed over the past years. All these tests consist in measuring the changes in cardiac output in response to the transient changes in cardiac preload that they induced. Most of these tests are based on the heart-lung interactions. The pulse pressure or stroke volume respiratory variations were first described, following by the respiratory variations of the vena cava diameter or of the internal jugular vein diameter. Nevertheless, all these tests are reliable only under strict conditions limiting their use in many clinical situations. Other tests such as passive leg raising or end-expiratory occlusion act as an internal volume challenge. To reliably predict fluid responsiveness, physicians must choose among these different dynamic tests, depending on their respective limitations and on the cardiac output monitoring technique which is used. In this review, we will summarize the most recent findings regarding the prediction of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Preload responsiveness; heart-lung interactions; preload reserve

Year:  2018        PMID: 30370279      PMCID: PMC6186547          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.05.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  83 in total

1.  Comparison of positive end-expiratory pressure-induced increase in central venous pressure and passive leg raising to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  N Kim; J-K Shim; H G Choi; M K Kim; J Y Kim; Y-L Kwak
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Changes in end-tidal CO2 could predict fluid responsiveness in the passive leg raising test but not in the mini-fluid challenge test: A prospective and observational study.

Authors:  Wang Xiao-ting; Zhao Hua; Liu Da-wei; Zhang Hong-min; He Huai-wu; Long Yun; Chai Wen-zhao
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.425

3.  Inferior vena cava variation compared to pulse contour analysis as predictors of fluid responsiveness: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Enrique Machare-Delgado; Matthew Decaro; Paul E Marik
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.510

4.  Arterial pressure allows monitoring the changes in cardiac output induced by volume expansion but not by norepinephrine.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Alexia Letierce; Olfa Hamzaoui; Denis Chemla; Nadia Anguel; David Osman; Christian Richard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Passive leg raising is predictive of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with severe sepsis or acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Sébastien Préau; Fabienne Saulnier; Florent Dewavrin; Alain Durocher; Jean-Luc Chagnon
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Critically Ill Patients by Using Combined End-Expiratory and End-Inspiratory Occlusions With Echocardiography.

Authors:  Mathieu Jozwiak; François Depret; Jean-Louis Teboul; Jean-Emmanuel Alphonsine; Christopher Lai; Christian Richard; Xavier Monnet
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Passive leg raising.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Mario Rienzo; David Osman; Nadia Anguel; Christian Richard; Michael R Pinsky; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy.

Authors:  Marc Feissel; Frédéric Michard; Jean-Pierre Faller; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients.

Authors:  Christophe Barbier; Yann Loubières; Christophe Schmit; Jan Hayon; Jean-Louis Ricôme; François Jardin; Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 17.440

View more
  10 in total

1.  Tidal volume challenge to predict preload responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under prone position.

Authors:  Rui Shi; Soufia Ayed; Francesca Moretto; Danila Azzolina; Nello De Vita; Francesco Gavelli; Simone Carelli; Arthur Pavot; Christopher Lai; Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 19.334

Review 2.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What's new?

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Rui Shi; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 10.318

3.  Hemodynamic Parameters in the Assessment of Fluid Status in a Porcine Hemorrhage and Resuscitation Model.

Authors:  Eric S Wise; Kyle M Hocking; Monica E Polcz; Gregory J Beilman; Colleen M Brophy; Jenna H Sobey; Philip J Leisy; Roy K Kiberenge; Bret D Alvis
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Evaluation of radial artery pulse pressure effects on detection of stroke volume changes after volume loading maneuvers in cardiac surgical patients.

Authors:  Jun-Yi Hou; Ji-Li Zheng; Guo-Guang Ma; Xiao-Ming Lin; Guang-Wei Hao; Ying Su; Jing-Chao Luo; Kai Liu; Zhe Luo; Guo-Wei Tu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

5.  Early rise in central venous pressure during a spontaneous breathing trial: A promising test to identify patients at high risk of weaning failure?

Authors:  Sebastián Dubo; Emilio Daniel Valenzuela; Andrés Aquevedo; Manuel Jibaja; Dolores Berrutti; Christian Labra; Rossana Lagos; María Fernanda García; Vanessa Ramírez; Milton Tobar; Fabricio Picoita; Cristian Peláez; David Carpio; Leyla Alegría; Carolina Hidalgo; Karen Godoy; Alejandro Bruhn; Glenn Hernández; Jan Bakker; Ricardo Castro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Slope analysis for the prediction of fluid responsiveness by a stepwise PEEP elevation recruitment maneuver in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Sylvain Vallier; Jean-Baptiste Bouchet; Olivier Desebbe; Camille Francou; Darren Raphael; Bernard Tardy; Laurent Gergele; Jérôme Morel
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Invasive and Non-invasive Dynamic Parameters to Predict Fluid Responsiveness After Off-pump Coronary Surgery.

Authors:  Evgeniia V Fot; Natalia N Izotova; Aleksei A Smetkin; Vsevolod V Kuzkov; Mikhail Y Kirov
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2022-02

8.  Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness by the Effect of the Lung Recruitment Maneuver on the Perfusion Index in Mechanically Ventilated Patients During Surgery.

Authors:  Sunthiti Morakul; Naruemol Prachanpanich; Pattarada Permsakmesub; Pimwatana Pinsem; Wasineenart Mongkolpun; Konlawij Trongtrakul
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-17

9.  The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation.

Authors:  In-Jung Jun; Mi Hwa Chung; Jung Eun Kim; Hye Sun Lee; Jung Mo Son; Eun Mi Choi
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  The passive leg raising under pressure: focus on the impact of intra-abdominal hypertension.

Authors:  Victor Beaucoté; Guillaume Geri; Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.