Literature DB >> 26140954

Changes in end-tidal CO2 could predict fluid responsiveness in the passive leg raising test but not in the mini-fluid challenge test: A prospective and observational study.

Wang Xiao-ting1, Zhao Hua2, Liu Da-wei3, Zhang Hong-min1, He Huai-wu1, Long Yun1, Chai Wen-zhao1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective is to explore the value of end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) in replacing cardiac index for evaluating fluid responsiveness during the passive leg raising (PLR) test and mini-fluid challenge (mini-FC).
METHODS: Patients experiencing septic shock and who were on mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit were divided into responder and nonresponder groups according to whether their cardiac index increased by more than 10% after the FC. Before and after those tests, the changes in ETCO2, central venous pressure, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, pulse pressure, and cardiac output were recorded.
RESULTS: Of the 48 patients in the study, 34 had fluid responsiveness according to the changes in cardiac output or stroke volume. The ΔCI and ΔETCO2 in the responder group were larger than the changes in the nonresponder group during the PLR test (1.1 ± 0.7 vs 0.2 ± 0.4 L/min per square meter, 3.0 ± 3.0 vs 0.5 ± 2.5 mm Hg; P < .05) but not during mini-FC. ΔETCO2 greater than or equal to 5% during the PLR test predicted fluid responsiveness with 93.4% specificity and 75.8% sensitivity in a receiver operating characteristic curve. The area under the curve was 0.849 (95% confidence interval, 0.739-0.930). ΔETCO2 greater than or equal to 3% during the mini-FC predicted fluid responsiveness with 93.4% specificity and 33.3% sensitivity in a receiver operating characteristic curve, and the area under the curve was 0.781 (95% confidence interval, 0.646-0.915).
CONCLUSIONS: The changes in ETCO2 may predict fluid responsiveness during the PLR test in patients with septic shock, but similar results were not found with the mini-FC.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ETCO(2); Fluid responsiveness; Passive leg raising test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26140954     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  10 in total

Review 1.  Fluid challenge in critically ill patients receiving haemodynamic monitoring: a systematic review and comparison of two decades.

Authors:  Antonio Messina; Lorenzo Calabrò; Luca Pugliese; Aulona Lulja; Alexandra Sopuch; Daniela Rosalba; Emanuela Morenghi; Glenn Hernandez; Xavier Monnet; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 19.334

Review 2.  Where Are We Heading With Fluid Responsiveness and Septic Shock?

Authors:  Mohammed Megri; Emily Fridenmaker; Margaret Disselkamp
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-03

Review 3.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients.

Authors:  Mathieu Jozwiak; Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

4.  Assessment of end-tidal carbon dioxide and vena cava collapsibility in volume responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients.

Authors:  S Güney Pınar; M Pekdemir; I U Özturan; N Ö Doğan; E Yaka; S Yılmaz; A Karadaş; D Ferek Emir
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 0.840

5.  End-tidal carbon dioxide variation after a 100- and a 500-ml fluid challenge to assess fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Matthias Jacquet-Lagrèze; Florent Baudin; Jean Stéphane David; Jean-Luc Fellahi; Patrick B Hu; Marc Lilot; Vincent Piriou
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 6.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Paul E Marik; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 7.  What is the impact of the fluid challenge technique on diagnosis of fluid responsiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura Toscani; Hollmann D Aya; Dimitra Antonakaki; Davide Bastoni; Ximena Watson; Nish Arulkumaran; Andrew Rhodes; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Value of variation of end-tidal carbon dioxide for predicting fluid responsiveness during the passive leg raising test in patients with mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haijun Huang; Chenxia Wu; Qinkang Shen; Yixin Fang; Hua Xu
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Norepinephrine with dopamine infusion on the end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETco2) pressure in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Mohammad Sazgar; Iraj Golikhatir; Seyedeh Masoomeh Pashaee; Fatemeh Tirandaz; Abolfazl Firouzian; Hamed Miniahidashti
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2021

10.  Early Effects of Passive Leg-Raising Test, Fluid Challenge, and Norepinephrine on Cerebral Autoregulation and Oxygenation in COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Chiara Robba; Antonio Messina; Denise Battaglini; Lorenzo Ball; Iole Brunetti; Matteo Bassetti; Daniele R Giacobbe; Antonio Vena; Nicolo' Patroniti; Maurizio Cecconi; Basil F Matta; Xiuyun Liu; Patricia R M Rocco; Marek Czosnyka; Paolo Pelosi
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.003

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.