Literature DB >> 25017208

Object-centered shifts of receptive field positions in monkey primary visual cortex.

Amy M Ni1, Scott O Murray2, Gregory D Horwitz1.   

Abstract

Stimuli that project the same retinal visual angle can appear to occupy very different proportions of the visual field if they are perceived to be at different distances [1-8]. Previous research shows that perceived angular size alters the spatial distribution of activity in early retinotopic visual cortex [7, 9-11]. For example, a sphere superimposed on the far end of a corridor scene appears to occupy a larger visual angle and activates a larger region of primary visual cortex (V1) compared with the same sphere superimposed on the near end of the corridor [7]. These previous results, however, were obtained from human subjects using psychophysics and fMRI, a fact that fundamentally limits our understanding of the underlying neuronal mechanisms. Here, we present an animal model that allows for a finer examination of size perception at the level of single neurons. We first show that macaque monkeys perceive a size-distance illusion similarly to humans. Then, using extracellular recordings, we test the specific hypothesis [12] that neurons in V1 shift the position of their receptive fields (RFs) in response to complex monocular depth cues. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that when ring-shaped stimuli appeared at the back of the corridor, RFs of V1 neurons shifted toward the center of the rings. When the same stimuli appeared at the front of the corridor, RFs shifted outward. Thus, our results show for the first time that V1 RFs can shift, potentially serving as the neural basis for the perception of angular size.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25017208      PMCID: PMC4123419          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  28 in total

1.  Rules of connectivity between geniculate cells and simple cells in cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  J M Alonso; W M Usrey; R C Reid
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A note on attitude and distance-estimation as variables in size-matching.

Authors:  E E RUMP
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1961-09

3.  Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Florian Pieper; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-13       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

5.  Orientation selectivity of thalamic input to simple cells of cat visual cortex.

Authors:  D Ferster; S Chung; H Wheat
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Strength and orientation tuning of the thalamic input to simple cells revealed by electrically evoked cortical suppression.

Authors:  S Chung; D Ferster
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  On size, distance, and visual angle perception.

Authors:  D McCready
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-04

8.  Distal and proximal size under reduced and non-reduced viewing conditions.

Authors:  H Ono
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1966-06

9.  Attention-dependent representation of a size illusion in human V1.

Authors:  Fang Fang; Huseyin Boyaci; Daniel Kersten; Scott O Murray
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  The surface area of human V1 predicts the subjective experience of object size.

Authors:  D Samuel Schwarzkopf; Chen Song; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-05       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  16 in total

1.  Position shifts of fMRI-based population receptive fields in human visual cortex induced by Ponzo illusion.

Authors:  Dongjun He; Ce Mo; Yizhou Wang; Fang Fang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Faster processing of moving compared with flashed bars in awake macaque V1 provides a neural correlate of the flash lag illusion.

Authors:  Manivannan Subramaniyan; Alexander S Ecker; Saumil S Patel; R James Cotton; Matthias Bethge; Xaq Pitkow; Philipp Berens; Andreas S Tolias
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Why do animals differ in their susceptibility to geometrical illusions?

Authors:  Lynna C Feng; Philippe A Chouinard; Tiffani J Howell; Pauleen C Bennett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

4.  Selective Optogenetic Control of Purkinje Cells in Monkey Cerebellum.

Authors:  Yasmine El-Shamayleh; Yoshiko Kojima; Robijanto Soetedjo; Gregory D Horwitz
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  An Orientation Dependent Size Illusion Is Underpinned by Processing in the Extrastriate Visual Area, LO1.

Authors:  Kyriaki Mikellidou; André D Gouws; Hannah Clawson; Peter Thompson; Antony B Morland; Bruce D Keefe
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-09-26

6.  Cortical idiosyncrasies predict the perception of object size.

Authors:  Christina Moutsiana; Benjamin de Haas; Andriani Papageorgiou; Jelle A van Dijk; Annika Balraj; John A Greenwood; D Samuel Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Computation of Object Size in Visual Cortical Area V4 as a Neural Basis for Size Constancy.

Authors:  Shingo Tanaka; Ichiro Fujita
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Pupillary Responses Obey Emmert's Law and Co-vary with Autistic Traits.

Authors:  Chiara Tortelli; Marco Turi; David C Burr; Paola Binda
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-08

9.  Adaptation to size affects saccades with long but not short latencies.

Authors:  Eckart Zimmermann; Maria Concetta Morrone; David Burr
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Illusory Increases in Font Size Improve Letter Recognition.

Authors:  Martin Lages; Stephanie C Boyle; Rob Jenkins
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.