| Literature DB >> 30363945 |
Shuo Huang1,2, Le Cheng3, Bin Zhu3, Ping Zhou1, Yu Sun1,4, Bing Zhang3, Suiren Wan1.
Abstract
The clarity improvement and the noise suppression of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images are very important. However, the common methods are very complicated. An image time-domain integration method is proposed in this study, which is based on the blood flow periodicity. In this method, the images of the first cardiac cycle after the injection of the contrast agent are integrated to obtain the time-domain integration image. This method can be used independently or as a postprocessing method of the denoising method on the signal image. The experimental results on DSA data from an aortic dissection patient show that the image time-domain integration method is efficient in image denoising and enhancement, which also has a good real-time performance. This method can also be used to improve the denoising and image enhancement effect of some common models.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30363945 PMCID: PMC6186332 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5284969
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
The image time-domain iteration method.
| 1. Delineate the region-of-interest |
| 2. Extract the images in the first cardiac cycle after the contrast agent enters the region-of-interest |
| 3. Image denoising with the median filter |
| 4. Extract the time-weighted image, |
| 5. Image time-domain integration, |
| 6. Extract the TDI image in the region-of-interest |
Figure 1A set of DSA images from a patient.
The mean value, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation of DSA images of the aortic dissection for the patient in Figure 1 in the first cardiac cycle after the contrast agent enters the aortic dissection.
| Time | 0 | 1/6 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 2/3 | 5/6 |
| TDI image |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 0.6794 | 0.6340 | 0.6948 | 0.6507 | 0.6958 | 0.5965 | 0.5978 | 0.6025 |
| Standard deviation | 0.3585 | 0.3452 | 0.3473 | 0.3554 | 0.3430 | 0.3784 | 0.3835 | 0.4425 |
| Coefficient of variation (%) | 52.77 | 54.44 | 49.98 | 54.62 | 49.30 | 63.44 | 64.15 | 73.44 |