Eijun Sueyoshi1, Hiroki Nagayama2, Ichiro Sakamoto2, Masataka Uetani2. 1. Department of Radiology, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, Nagasaki, Japan. Electronic address: sueyo@nagasaki-u.ac.jp. 2. Department of Radiology, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, Nagasaki, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography (CO2-DSA) as an option for the detection of endoleaks (ELs) in the endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedure. METHODS: Forty patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm who were scheduled to undergo EVAR were enrolled in the study. There were 35 men and five women (mean age, 77.9 years). All patients had both iodinated contrast conventional DSA (C-DSA) and CO2-DSA immediately after EVAR. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the ability of CO2-DSA to detect ELs. We also correlated with computed tomography findings 6 months after EVAR. RESULTS: C-DSA showed that 27 of the 40 patients (68%) had 28 ELs (type I, four; type II, 20; type III, three; type IV, one). CO2-DSA showed that 16 of the 40 patients (40%) had 17 ELs (type I, four; type II, 10; type III, three; type IV, none). For the prediction of direct ELs (type I and type III) with use of C-DSA as the criterion standard, CO2-DSA has a sensitivity of 1.0 and a specificity of 1.0. For the detection of persistent type II ELs (n = 11) with use of computed tomography findings 6 months from EVAR as the criterion standard, CO2-DSA has a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.97. C-DSA has a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.64. CONCLUSIONS: CO2-DSA is reliable for the detection of direct ELs and persistent type II ELs in EVAR. CO2-DSA can be an option to detect ELs in the EVAR procedure.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography (CO2-DSA) as an option for the detection of endoleaks (ELs) in the endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedure. METHODS: Forty patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm who were scheduled to undergo EVAR were enrolled in the study. There were 35 men and five women (mean age, 77.9 years). All patients had both iodinated contrast conventional DSA (C-DSA) and CO2-DSA immediately after EVAR. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the ability of CO2-DSA to detect ELs. We also correlated with computed tomography findings 6 months after EVAR. RESULTS:C-DSA showed that 27 of the 40 patients (68%) had 28 ELs (type I, four; type II, 20; type III, three; type IV, one). CO2-DSA showed that 16 of the 40 patients (40%) had 17 ELs (type I, four; type II, 10; type III, three; type IV, none). For the prediction of direct ELs (type I and type III) with use of C-DSA as the criterion standard, CO2-DSA has a sensitivity of 1.0 and a specificity of 1.0. For the detection of persistent type II ELs (n = 11) with use of computed tomography findings 6 months from EVAR as the criterion standard, CO2-DSA has a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.97. C-DSA has a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.64. CONCLUSIONS:CO2-DSA is reliable for the detection of direct ELs and persistent type II ELs in EVAR. CO2-DSA can be an option to detect ELs in the EVAR procedure.
Authors: Chiara De Angelis; Francesco Sardanelli; Matteo Perego; Marco Alì; Francesco Casilli; Luigi Inglese; Giovanni Mauri Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-05-27 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Shuo Huang; Le Cheng; Bin Zhu; Ping Zhou; Yu Sun; Bing Zhang; Suiren Wan Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Date: 2018-09-30 Impact factor: 2.238