| Literature DB >> 30363659 |
Gwang-Ju Jang1, Mi Jeong Sung1, Haeng Jeon Hur1, Miyoung Yoo1, Jung Hoon Choi2, In Koo Hwang3, Sanghee Lee1.
Abstract
Hyperlipidemia is a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and is a major public health concern. Allium hookeri (AH) is an Allium species containing high levels of bioactive organosulfur compounds such as methiin and cycloalliin. AH exerts hypolipidemic effects in animals fed a high-fat diet. However, there exists little information on the mechanisms underlying these effects. To address this issue, we used a metabolomic approach based on ultra-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry to identify factors mediating the lipid-lowering effects of AH. Principal component and partial least-squares discriminant analyses of serum metabolome profiles revealed 25 metabolites as potential biomarkers for the effects of AH on lipid levels. These compounds were predominantly phospholipids, including phosphatidylcholines (PCs), lysoPCs, and lysophosphatidylethanolamines. Glycerophospholipid metabolism was identified as a significantly enriched pathway. These results provide mechanistic insight into the antihyperlipidemic effects of AH and evidence for its efficacy as a therapeutic agent.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30363659 PMCID: PMC6180932 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5659174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1PCA score plot (a) and PLS-DA score plot (b) of serum samples analyzed by UPLC-Q-TOF-MS in positive mode. Normal control group (green), HFD group (blue), and HFD+AH (red).
UPLC-Q-TOF-MS analysis of identification results of potential biomarkers in serum measured by LC-QTOF/MS.
| No. | RT(a) | Identified | VIP(b) | Adduct | Elemental | Metabolites | Hyperlipidemic group vs control group | AH-treated group vs hyperlipidemic group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FC(c) | p-value(d) | FC | p-valued | |||||||
| 1 | 0.92 | 219.0271 | 0.238 | [M+H-2H2O]+ | C11H10O7 | Benzoyl meso-tartaric acid | 0.79 | 9.94×10-3 | 0.86 | 6.72×10-2 |
| 2 | 0.93 | 280.0922 | 0.331 | [M+Na]+ | C10H15N3O5 | Pyro-glutaminyl-glutamine | 1.28 | 2.47×10-1 | 0.66 | 3.33×10-2 |
| 3 | 0.94 | 175.1194 | 0.181 | [M+H]+ | C6H14N4O2 | Arginine | 0.73 | 4.12×10-2 | 0.78 | 1.81×10-2 |
| 4 | 0.98 | 203.0148 | 0.153 | [N+2Na-H]+ | C4H6N4O3 | Allantoin | 0.30 | 2.09×10-5 | 0.86 | 4.81×10-1 |
| 5 | 1.02 | 160.0350 | 0.118 | [M+2Na-H]+ | C5H9NO2 | Proline | 1.14 | 4.51×10-1 | 0.68 | 1.81×10-2 |
| 6 | 1.16 | 162.0505 | 0.121 | [M+2Na-H]+ | C5H11NO2 | Betaine | 0.58 | 1.07×10-2 | 0.83 | 2.52×10-1 |
| 7 | 1.63 | 204.1233 | 0.258 | [M+H]+ | C9H17NO4 | Acetylcarnitine | 0.29 | 2.94×10-2 | 0.94 | 8.19×10-1 |
| 8 | 2.14 | 165.0550 | 0.689 | [M+H]+ | C9H8O3 | Phenylpyruvic acid | 0.90 | 4.51×10-1 | 0.58 | 7.35×10-4 |
| 9 | 2.41 | 176.0672 | 0.052 | [M+Na]+ | C8H11NO2 | Dopamine | 0.53 | 1.88×10-4 | 0.79 | 9.45×10-3 |
| 10 | 3.01 | 166.0868 | 0.213 | [M+H]+ | C9H11NO2 | Phenylalanine | 0.67 | 1.65×10-4 | 0.88 | 1.02×10-1 |
| 11 | 3.85 | 144.0811 | 0.406 | [M+H-H2O]+ | C10H11NO | Tryptophanol | 0.65 | 3.82×10-4 | 0.73 | 2.47×10-2 |
| 12 | 3.85 | 188.0714 | 1.400 | [M+H]+ | C11H9NO2 | Indoleacrylic acid | 0.66 | 1.54×10-4 | 0.73 | 1.17×10-2 |
| 13 | 9.54 | 464.2829 | 0.217 | [M+H-2H2O]+ | C26H45NO6S | Tauroursodeoxycholic acid | - | 1.28×10-2 | 0.50 | 2.14×10-1 |
| 14 | 11.13 | 373.2740 | 0.355 | [M+H]+ | C24H40O5 | Cholic acid | 0.16 | 8.01×10-3 | 4.46 | 1.56×10-1 |
| 15 | 13.51 | 468.3094 | 1.539 | [M+H]+ | C22H46NO7P | LysoPC(14:0) | 4.38 | 5.65×10-6 | 0.78 | 2.47×10-2 |
| 16 | 13.85 | 518.3246 | 0.790 | [M+H]+ | C26H48NO7P | LysoPC(18:3) | 5.20 | 3.83×10-8 | 0.72 | 1.29×10-2 |
| 17 | 14.04 | 494.3251 | 1.142 | [M+H]+ | C24H48NO7P | LysoPC(16:1) | 1.28 | 3.28×10-2 | 0.84 | 8.54×10-2 |
| 18 | 14.48 | 482.3246 | 1.325 | [M+H]+ | C23H48NO7P | LysoPC(15:0) | 2.08 | 4.09×10-5 | 0.84 | 3.69×10-2 |
| 19 | 14.98 | 508.3406 | 1.089 | [M+H]+ | C26H54NO6P | LysoPE(20:1) | 2.53 | 2.31×10-7 | 0.79 | 6.29×10-3 |
| 20 | 15.38 | 546.3565 | 3.406 | [M+H]+ | C28H52NO7P | LysoPC(20:3) | 2.66 | 8.03×10-9 | 0.76 | 1.04×10-3 |
| 21 | 16.25 | 510.3562 | 2.007 | [M+H]+ | C25H52NO7P | LysoPC(17:0) | 2.55 | 3.55×10-5 | 0.81 | 3.35×10-2 |
| 22 | 17.12 | 524.3714 | 1.906 | [M+H]+ | C26H52NO7P | LysoPC(18:0) | 1.38 | 5.76×10-4 | 0.92 | 3.13×10-2 |
| 23 | 17.44 | 482.3245 | 1.728 | [M+H]+ | C23H48NO7P | LysoPE(18:0) | 1.48 | 1.59×10-6 | 0.84 | 4.10×10-3 |
| 24 | 21.28 | 734.5687 | 3.244 | [M+H]+ | C40H80NO8P | PC(32:0) | 6.24 | 6.03×10-4 | 0.60 | 2.43×10-1 |
| 25 | 21.73 | 834.6012 | 5.101 | [M+H]+ | C44H88NO8P | PC(36:0) | 4.42 | 1.10×10-2 | 0.77 | 1.19×10-2 |
(a)Retention time.
(b)Variable importance in projection values was obtained from partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) model.
(c)Relative levels of metabolites were converted into fold-changes.
(d) p values were calculated from a one-way ANOVA.
Figure 2Comparison of different potential biomarkers among control group, HFD group, and HFD+AH group after administration. p<0.05, p<0.01, and p<0.001 significant difference compared with control group; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01, and ###p<0.001 significant difference compared with HFD group. Y-axis: normalized relative intensity.
Result from ingenuity pathway analysis with MetPA.
| Pathway | Total | hits | p | -log(p) | Holm p | FDR | impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycerophospholipid metabolism | 39 | 2 | 0.0015041 | 6.4996 | 0.12033 | 0.12033 | 0.104 |
| Linoleic acid metabolism | 15 | 1 | 0.024711 | 3.7005 | 1.0 | 0.98842 | 0.000 |
| alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism | 29 | 1 | 0.047358 | 3.05 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.000 |
| Primary bile acid biosynthesis | 47 | 1 | 0.075893 | 2.5784 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.000 |
| Arachidonic acid metabolism | 62 | 1 | 0.099179 | 2.3108 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.000 |
| Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis | 75 | 1 | 0.119 | 2.1286 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.000 |
| Arginine and proline metabolism | 77 | 1 | 0.12202 | 2.1036 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.102 |
The total is number of compounds in the pathway; the hits are the actually matched number from the user uploaded data; the raw p is the original p value calculated from the enrichment analysis; the Holm p is the p value adjusted by Holm-Bonferroni method; and the impact is the pathway impact value calculated from pathway topology analysis.
Figure 3Summary of pathway analysis with MetPA. (1) Glycerophospholipid metabolism; (2) linoleic acid metabolism; (3) alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism; (4) primary bile acid biosynthesis; (5) arachidonic acid metabolism; (6) aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis; and (7) arginine and proline metabolism.