| Literature DB >> 32419830 |
Zhou Liao1, Shanshan Li1, Yun Huang1, Xiaoquan Luo1, Youbao Zhong1, Yanhua Ji1, Dan Su1, Zhifu Ai1.
Abstract
Ephedra sinica Stapf (EP) has a long medication history dating back centuries in the world. There were some reports of adverse effects in the central nervous system (CNS) resulting from administration of a drug containing EP or ephedrine. Compared with alkaloid monomer compounds, the effects of EP on the CNS are usually neglected. It is necessary to explore CNS affection which is helpful to use EP rationally. However, the affection and the changes of substances by EP in the brain are still unknown because the effects of drug on the brain also exhibit different tendency and distribution and usually lead to diversity of metabolite alteration in different regions. In this study, metabolomics based on different brain regions was used to investigate the affection mechanism of EP in the CNS. The metabolites in 6 brain regions from a rat that underwent oral administration with EP for 14 days were determined by UPLC/Q-TOF-MS. Brain histological examinations showed that there were no obvious lesions in EP administration groups. Partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) displayed that there were significant separations between control and EP administration groups. 7 CNS biomarkers were found and identified in different regions. 3 metabolic pathways were disturbed by EP, including amino acid metabolism, phospholipid metabolism, and amino sugar metabolism. Furthermore, all biomarkers were significantly changed in the cortex after administration. This study may be helpful to understand the affection mechanism of EP in the CNS and improve cognition of brain regional characteristics.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32419830 PMCID: PMC7201840 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8358039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1The base peak intensity (BPI) chromatograms of mixed samples of brain tissue in three groups. (a) CG. (b) LDG. (c) HDG.
Figure 2(a) Score plots of different brain regions. Each point represents a sample. Green asterisks represent CG samples, blue asterisks represent LDG samples, and red asterisks represent HDG samples. (b) Loading plots of different brain regions. Each point represents a variable.
Potential biomarkers identified in the positive mode.
| Number | Retention time (min) | Biomarker | Molecular formula | Parent ion ( | Fragment ion ( | Error (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.97 | N-Carbamoylsarcosine | C4H8N2O3 | 133.0612[M+H]+ | 114.0471, 90.0358 | 3 |
| 2 | 3.62 | Hydroxylysine | C6H14N2O3 | 163.1078[M+H]+ | 144.9638 | 1 |
| 3 | 2.56 | Serinyl-valine | C8H16N2O4 | 205.1182[M+H]+ | 118.0668, 60.0360 | −0.5 |
| 4 | 0.70 | Trap-Val-Arg | C22H33N7O4 | 460.2637[M+H]+ | 415.2028 | −3 |
| 5 | 5.46 | GPC | C8H20NO6P | 258.1102[M+H]+ | 221.0004 | 0.4 |
| 6 | 1.00 | LysoPC (16 : 0) | C24H50NO7P | 496.3358[M+H]+ | 184.0544 | −8 |
| 7 | 1.53 | Neuraminic acid | C9H17NO8 | 268.1035[M+H]+ | 136.0425 | 3 |
Figure 3Hematoxylin-eosin staining to delineate the effect of EP on brain histopathologic changes. (a) CG (×100); (b) LDG (×100); (c) HDG (×100); (d) CG (×200); (e) LDG (×200); (f) HDG (×200). Scale bar, 100 μm.
Figure 4Changes of biomarkers in six brain regions. All data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6/group); P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, compared with the CG. (a) Hydroxylysine. (b) N-Carbamoylsarcosine. (c) Serinyl-valine. (d) Trap-Val-Arg. (e) GPC. (f) LysoPC (16 : 0). (g) Neuraminic acid.
Figure 5Metabolic pathway related to biomarkers. Metabolites highlighted in red are biomarkers. Metabolites in the green area participate in phospholipid metabolism. Metabolites in the red area participate in amino acid metabolism.