| Literature DB >> 30360474 |
Seoung Rak Lee1, Eunyong Choi2, Se Hun Jeon3, Xue Yan Zhi4, Jae Sik Yu5, Seon-Hee Kim6, Jeongmi Lee7, Ki-Moon Park8, Ki Hyun Kim9.
Abstract
Cornus walteri Wanger (Cornaceae) has been broadly used in traditional East Asian medicine for the treatment of various disorders, including skin inflammation and diarrhea. As part of our efforts to identify structurally and/or biologically new compounds from Korean medicinal plants, we have explored potentially new bioactive constituents from C. walteri. In the present study, seven triterpenoids (1⁻7) were isolated from C. walteri stems and stem bark. Compounds 1⁻3 were new tirucallane triterpenoids (cornusalterins N-P) and compounds 4⁻7 were isolated for the first time from C. walteri. The structures of the new compounds were determined based on 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopic data interpretations and HR-ESIMS, as well as a computational method coupled with a statistical procedure (DP4+). The regulatory effects of the isolated triterpenoids (1⁻7) on mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) differentiation to adipocytes and osteoblasts were examined in the C3H10T1/2 cell line. Although these compounds had little effect on MSC differentiation to osteoblasts, lipid droplet formation in adipocyte-differentiated MSCs decreased in the presence of the seven triterpenoids. Compounds 1 and 4 each had a relatively distinct correlation between dose and efficacy, showing adipogenesis suppression at higher concentrations. Our findings demonstrate that the active compounds 1 and 4 can exert beneficial effects in regulation of adipocyte differentiation.Entities:
Keywords: Cornus walteri; adipocytes; cornusalterins N-P; mesenchymal stem cell; osteoblasts; triterpenoid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30360474 PMCID: PMC6278563 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23112732
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structures of compounds 1–7 from C. walteri.
1H (500 MHz) and 13C (125 MHz) NMR data for compounds 1–3 in CDCl3. a
| Position | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | 1.64 m 1.15 m | 39.2 t | 1.76 m 1.28 m | 40.1 t | 1.69 m 1.07 m | 39.3 t |
| 2 | 1.75 m 1.65 m | 27.5 t | 2.51 m, 2.43 m | 34.3 t | 1.82 m, 1.64 m | 27.6 t |
| 3 | 3.22 dd (11.5 5.0) | 78.9 d | 218.5 s | 3.20 dd (11.5, 5.0) | 79.1 d | |
| 4 | 38.9 s | 47.6 s | 39.2 s | |||
| 5 | 0.75 m | 55.8 d | 1.36 m | 55.6 d | 0.73 m | 56.1 d |
| 6 | 1.72 m 1.50 m | 18.3 t | 1.75 m, 1.53 m | 22.2 t | 1.70 m, 1.48 m | 18.5 t |
| 7 | 1.52 m, 1.28 m | 24.8 t | 1.52 m, 1.30 m | 25.0 t | 1.51 m, 1.28 m | 25.0 t |
| 8 | 1.43 m | 42.4 d | 1.41 m | 42.7 d | 1.40 m | 42.6 d |
| 9 | 1.34 m | 50.6 d | 1.35 m | 50.2 d | 1.32 m | 50.9 d |
| 10 | 37.1 s | 37.0 s | 37.4 s | |||
| 11 | 1.53 m, 1.06 m | 21.5 t | 1.46 m, 1.09 m | 19.9 t | 1.45 m, 1.07 m | 21.7 t |
| 12 | 1.74 m, 1.22 m | 25.4 t | 1.71 m, 1.23 m | 25.1 t | 1.73 m, 1.21 m | 25.1 t |
| 13 | 40.3 s | 40.5 s | 40.6 s | |||
| 14 | 50.3 s | 50.4 s | 50.5 s | |||
| 15 | 1.52 m, 1.29 m | 31.2 t | 1.56 m, 1.30 m | 31.3 t | 1.49 m, 1.27 m | 31.3 t |
| 16 | 1.82 m, 1.21 m | 27.4 t | 1.86 m, 1.23 m | 27.7 t | 1.84 m, 1.25 m | 27.5 t |
| 17 | 1.49 m | 50.1 d | 1.74, m | 50.1 d | 1.72 m | 50.1 d |
| 18 | 0.97 s | 15.5 q | 1.00 s | 15.4 q | 0.96 s | 15.7 q |
| 19 | 0.86 s | 16.2 q | 0.95 s | 16.2 q | 0.85 s | 16.4 q |
| 20 | 75.4 s | 75.2 s | 75.3 s | |||
| 21 | 1.16 s | 25.3 q | 1.14 s | 26.1 q | 1.13 s | 26.0 q |
| 22 | 1.42 m | 36.3 t | 2.21 m | 43.6 t | 2.20 m | 43.6 t |
| 23 | 1.83 m, 1.61 m | 29.3 t | 5.70 m | 122.5 d | 5.70 m | 122.6 d |
| 24 | 4.06 t (6.0) | 76.2 d | 5.71 m | 142.3 d | 5.71 m | 142.2 d |
| 25 | 147.6 s | 71.0 s | 71.0 s | |||
| 26 | 4.96 br s, 4.86 br s | 110.7 t | 1.33 s | 30.2 q | 1.33 s | 30.2 q |
| 27 | 1.75 s | 18.0 q | 1.33 s | 30.1 q | 1.33 s | 30.1 q |
| 28 | 0.99 s | 28.0 q | 1.08 s | 27.0 q | 0.97 s | 28.2 q |
| 29 | 0.79 s | 15.3 q | 1.04 s | 21.2 q | 0.77 s | 15.6 q |
| 30 | 0.89 s | 16.4 q | 0.88 s | 16.5 q | 0.87 s | 16.6 q |
aJ values are in parentheses and reported in Hz.
Figure 2Key COSY () and HMBC (→) correlations for compounds 1–3.
Figure 3Important NOESY correlations of compounds 1–3. (a) cornusalterin N (1); (b) cornusalterin O (2); and (c) cornusalterin P (3).
Figure 4The effects of compounds 1–7 on the differentiation of MSCs toward osteoblasts or adipocytes. The mouse mesenchymal stem cell line, C3H10T1/2, was treated with compounds 1–7. After osteogenic differentiation, the cells were stained with ALP (A) and ALP enzyme activity was measured (B). In the separate plates, the cells were differentiated into adipocytes prior to ORO staining (C). Stained cells were quantitatively evaluated by resolving stained lipid droplets and measuring absorbance at the red wavelength (D). Ctrl represents untreated negative control. 5 μM of oryzativol A (OryA) was added to the experimental set as a positive osteogenesis control. 20 μM of resveratrol (Res) was used as a positive control in adipogenesis. 10 μM of each of the compounds was added to the osteogenesis- or adipogenesis-differentiation medium. * denotes p < 0.05 and *** denotes p < 0.001.
Figure 5Suppressive effects of compounds 1–7 on adipogenic differentiation. C3H10T1/2 cells were treated with sequential concentrations (1, 5, 10, and 20 μM) of the compounds for nine days prior to ORO staining. (A) Stained cells were quantitatively evaluated by resolving stained lipid droplets and measuring absorbance at the red wavelength; (B) 20 μM of resveratrol (denoted as Res) was used as the positive control. The values were relatively calculated by setting the untreated negative control to 100. C3H10T1/2 cells were treated with higher concentrations (5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 μM) of the compounds to evaluate the cellular toxicity; (C) Cell viability was calculated relatively by setting the untreated negative control to 100. * denotes 0.01 < p < 0.05, ** denotes 0.001 < p < 0.01, and *** denotes p < 0.001.