Literature DB >> 24315957

Role of diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to contrast-enhanced breast MRI in evaluating residual breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Soo Yeon Hahn1, Eun Young Ko2, Boo-Kyung Han3, Jung Hee Shin4, Eun Sook Ko5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the addition of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) improves diagnostic performance in predicting pathologic response and residual breast cancer size following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 78 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative breast MRI with DWI following neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled. DWI was performed on a 1.5 T system with b values of 0 and 750 s/mm. or on a 3T system with b values of 0 and 800 or 0 and 1,000 s/mm. The images on DCE-MRI alone, DWI alone, and DCE-MRI plus DWI were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated the diagnostic performances of the three MRI protocols for the detection of residual cancer. The tumor size as predicted by MRI was compared with histopathologic findings. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were also compared between the groups with and without residual cancer.
RESULTS: Of the 78 patients, 59 (75.6%) had residual cancer. For detection of residual cancer, DCE-MRI plus DWI had higher specificity (80.0%), accuracy (91.0%), and PPV (93.2%) than DCE-MRI or DWI alone (P=0.004, P=0.007, and P=0.034, respectively). The ICC values for residual cancer size between MRI and histopathology were 0.891 for DCE-MRI plus DWI, 0.792 for DCE-MRI, and 0.773 for DWI. ADC values showed no significant differences between residual cancer and chemotherapeutic changes (P=0.130).
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of DWI to DCE-MRI significantly improved diagnostic performance in predicting pathologic response and residual breast cancer size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Diffusion-weighted image; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24315957     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  14 in total

1.  Diagnostic performance of ADCs in different ROIs for breast lesions.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Guan-Qiao Jin; Jun-Jie Liu; Dan-Ke Su; Ning-Bin Luo; Dong Xie; Shao-Lv Lai; Xiang-Yang Huang; Wei-Li Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

2.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast tumours at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla: a comparison.

Authors:  S Gruber; L Minarikova; K Pinker; O Zaric; M Chmelik; B Strasser; P Baltzer; T Helbich; S Trattnig; W Bogner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Sequence design and evaluation of the reproducibility of water-selective diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast at 3 T.

Authors:  He Zhu; Lori R Arlinghaus; Jennifer G Whisenant; Ming Li; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  A dual-tuned multichannel bilateral RF coil for 1 H/23 Na breast MRI at 7 T.

Authors:  Carlotta Ianniello; Guillaume Madelin; Linda Moy; Ryan Brown
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Impact of Machine Learning With Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast for Early Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Amirhessam Tahmassebi; Georg J Wengert; Thomas H Helbich; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Sousan Alaei; Rupert Bartsch; Peter Dubsky; Pascal Baltzer; Paola Clauser; Panagiotis Kapetas; Elizabeth A Morris; Anke Meyer-Baese; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 6.  MR Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Lori R Arlinghaus; Adrienne N Dula; C Chad Quarles; Ashley M Stokes; Jared A Weis; Jennifer G Whisenant; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Igor Zhukov; Jason M Williams; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

7.  Predicting the Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Therapy Using a Mechanically Coupled Reaction-Diffusion Model.

Authors:  Jared A Weis; Michael I Miga; Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; Vandana Abramson; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Praveen Pendyala; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Multi-site clinical evaluation of DW-MRI as a treatment response metric for breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Craig J Galbán; Bing Ma; Dariya Malyarenko; Martin D Pickles; Kevin Heist; Norah L Henry; Anne F Schott; Colleen H Neal; Nola M Hylton; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Timothy D Johnson; Charles R Meyer; Thomas L Chenevert; Lindsay W Turnbull; Brian D Ross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Preoperative axillary staging with 3.0-T breast MRI: clinical value of diffusion imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient.

Authors:  Suvi Rautiainen; Mervi Könönen; Reijo Sironen; Amro Masarwah; Mazen Sudah; Juhana Hakumäki; Ritva Vanninen; Anna Sutela
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessing Detection, Discrimination, and Risk of Breast Cancer According to Anisotropy Parameters of Diffusion Tensor Imaging.

Authors:  Ruisheng Jiang; Xiangmin Zeng; Shihang Sun; Zhijun Ma; Ximing Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.