Literature DB >> 30353408

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Upper Extremity Motor Recovery: Does It Help?

Heidi M Schambra1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) noninvasively modulates brain excitability in humans and influences mediators of plasticity in animals. When applied in humans in the months to years after stroke, potentiation of motor recovery has been limited. Recently, investigators have shifted rTMS administration into the early weeks following stroke, when injury-induced plasticity could be maximally engaged. This article provides an overview of basic mechanisms of rTMS, consideration of its interaction with various forms of neuroplasticity, and a summary of the highest quality clinical evidence for rTMS given early after stroke. RECENT
FINDINGS: Studies of repetitive magnetic stimulation in vitro and in vivo have found modulation of excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission and induction of cellular mechanisms supporting plasticity. A handful of clinical studies have shown sustained improvements in grip strength and UE motor impairment when rTMS is delivered in the first weeks after stroke. Though in its infancy, recent research suggests a plasticity-enhancing influence and modest motor recovery potentiation when rTMS is delivered early after stroke.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Associative plasticity; Homeostatic plasticity; Motor recovery; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30353408      PMCID: PMC6537096          DOI: 10.1007/s11910-018-0913-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep        ISSN: 1528-4042            Impact factor:   5.081


  57 in total

Review 1.  LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches.

Authors:  Robert C Malenka; Mark F Bear
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Metaplasticity: the plasticity of synaptic plasticity.

Authors:  W C Abraham; M F Bear
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Bilateral high- and low-frequency rTMS in acute stroke patients with hemiparesis: a comparative study with unilateral high-frequency rTMS.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Sasaki; Wataru Kakuda; Masahiro Abo
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery and motor cortex excitability in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  J Du; L Tian; W Liu; J Hu; G Xu; M Ma; X Fan; R Ye; Y Jiang; Q Yin; W Zhu; Y Xiong; F Yang; X Liu
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 6.089

5.  Patterned stimulation at the theta frequency is optimal for the induction of hippocampal long-term potentiation.

Authors:  J Larson; D Wong; G Lynch
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1986-03-19       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex.

Authors:  E L Bienenstock; L N Cooper; P W Munro
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Capture, learning, and classification of upper extremity movement primitives in healthy controls and stroke patients.

Authors:  Jorge Guerra; Jasim Uddin; Dawn Nilsen; James Mclnerney; Ammarah Fadoo; Isirame B Omofuma; Shatif Hughes; Sunil Agrawal; Peter Allen; Heidi M Schambra
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2017-07

8.  Daily Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Poststroke Upper Limb Paresis in the Subacute Period.

Authors:  Koichi Hosomi; Shayne Morris; Tomosaburo Sakamoto; Junji Taguchi; Tomoyuki Maruo; Yu Kageyama; Yusuke Kinoshita; Yuko Goto; Toshio Shimokawa; Tetsuo Koyama; Youichi Saitoh
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.136

9.  Shaping Early Reorganization of Neural Networks Promotes Motor Function after Stroke.

Authors:  L J Volz; A K Rehme; J Michely; C Nettekoven; S B Eickhoff; G R Fink; C Grefkes
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 10.  Releasing the Cortical Brake by Non-Invasive Electromagnetic Stimulation? rTMS Induces LTD of GABAergic Neurotransmission.

Authors:  Maximilian Lenz; Andreas Vlachos
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.492

View more
  4 in total

1.  Excitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Ipsilesional Hemisphere for Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhiqing Tang; Kaiyue Han; Rongrong Wang; Yue Zhang; Hao Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  Multi-session delivery of synchronous rTMS and sensory stimulation induces long-term plasticity.

Authors:  Ming Zhong; Carolina Cywiak; Abigael C Metto; Xiang Liu; Chunqi Qian; Galit Pelled
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 9.184

Review 3.  Discussion on the Rehabilitation of Stroke Hemiplegia Based on Interdisciplinary Combination of Medicine and Engineering.

Authors:  Xiaowei Sun; Ke Xu; Yuqing Shi; Hongtao Li; Ruobing Li; Siyu Yang; Hong Jin; Chuwen Feng; Baitao Li; Chunyue Xing; Yuanyuan Qu; Qingyong Wang; Yinghua Chen; Tiansong Yang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 4.  Neurostimulation and Reach-to-Grasp Function Recovery Following Acquired Brain Injury: Insight From Pre-clinical Rodent Models and Human Applications.

Authors:  Charles-Francois V Latchoumane; Deborah A Barany; Lohitash Karumbaiah; Tarkeshwar Singh
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.003

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.