Literature DB >> 27425785

Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery and motor cortex excitability in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

J Du1, L Tian2, W Liu2, J Hu2, G Xu2, M Ma2, X Fan2, R Ye2, Y Jiang2, Q Yin2, W Zhu2, Y Xiong2, F Yang3, X Liu4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) changes the excitability of the motor cortex and thereby has the potential to enhance motor recovery after stroke. This randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind study was to compare the effects of high-frequency versus low-frequency rTMS on motor recovery during the early phase of stroke and to identify the neurophysiological correlates of motor improvements.
METHODS: A total of 69 first-ever ischemic stroke patients with motor deficits were randomly allocated to receive five daily sessions of 3-Hz ipsilesional rTMS, 1-Hz contralesional rTMS or sham rTMS in addition to standard physical therapy. Outcome measures included motor deficits, neurological scores and cortical excitability, which were assessed at baseline, after the intervention and at 3-month follow-up.
RESULTS: The rTMS groups manifested greater motor improvements than the control group, which were sustained for at least 3 months after the end of the treatment sessions. 1-Hz rTMS over the unaffected hemisphere produced more profound effects than 3-Hz rTMS in facilitating upper limb motor performance. There was a significant correlation between motor function improvement and motor cortex excitability change in the affected hemisphere.
CONCLUSIONS: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is a beneficial neurorehabilitative strategy for enhancing motor recovery in the acute and subacute phase after stroke.
© 2016 EAN.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cortical excitability; interhemispheric inhibition; motor cortex; motor dysfunction; neurorehabilitative; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27425785     DOI: 10.1111/ene.13105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurol        ISSN: 1351-5101            Impact factor:   6.089


  23 in total

1.  New developments in clinical ischemic stroke prevention and treatment and their imaging implications.

Authors:  Jeremy J Heit; Max Wintermark
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 2.  [Brain stimulation for treating stroke-related motor deficits].

Authors:  Caroline Tscherpel; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  GABA-induced motor improvement following acute cerebral infarction.

Authors:  Qingmei Chen; Jun Ke; Xiuying Cai; Haiwei Sun; Zhiguo Chen; Li Li; Min Su; Qi Fang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Excitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Ipsilesional Hemisphere for Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhiqing Tang; Kaiyue Han; Rongrong Wang; Yue Zhang; Hao Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 5.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Upper Extremity Motor Recovery: Does It Help?

Authors:  Heidi M Schambra
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.081

6.  Effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) after acute stroke: A one-year longitudinal randomized trial.

Authors:  Yu-Zhou Guan; Jing Li; Xue-Wei Zhang; Shuang Wu; Hua Du; Li-Ying Cui; Wei-Hong Zhang
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 5.243

Review 7.  Neurostimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Windsor Kwan-Chun Ting; Faïza Abdou-Rahaman Fadul; Shirley Fecteau; Christian Ethier
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 8.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for lower extremity motor function in patients with stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun-Juan Xie; Yi Chen; Hui-Xin Tan; Qi-Fan Guo; Benson Wui-Man Lau; Qiang Gao
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 5.135

9.  Corticospinal Excitability in Children with Congenital Hemiparesis.

Authors:  Chao-Ying Chen; Tonya L Rich; Jessica M Cassidy; Bernadette T Gillick
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2016-10-20

Review 10.  Role of the Contralesional vs. Ipsilesional Hemisphere in Stroke Recovery.

Authors:  Keith C Dodd; Veena A Nair; Vivek Prabhakaran
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.