BACKGROUND:High- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS and LF-rTMS) has been shown to be beneficial for upper limb hemiparesis in patients with acute stroke. However, no study has examined the usefulness of bilateral application of HF- and LF-rTMS (BL-rTMS). METHODS:Fifty-eight hemiparetic patients with acute stroke were randomly assigned into two groups: HF-rTMS group and BL-rTMS group. All patients were scheduled to receive five sessions of either HF-rTMS over the lesional hemisphere or BL-rTMS over both hemispheres for 5 days. Motor function of the affected upper limb was evaluated using the Brunnstrom Recovery Stage (BRS) for upper-limb and hand-fingers, grip strength and tapping frequency, before the first session and after the last session of rTMS. RESULTS:Improvement of BRS for the upper limb and hand/finger was significantly greater in the BL-rTMS group than the HF-rTMS group (p < 0.01). Improvement in grip strength and tapping frequency was also greater in the BL-rTMS group, although the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed BL-rTMS is safe and feasible and showed a greater improvement of BRS of the affected upper limb compared to HF-rTMS. This novel rTMS approach may be a useful intervention for hemiparetic patients with acute stroke.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: High- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS and LF-rTMS) has been shown to be beneficial for upper limb hemiparesis in patients with acute stroke. However, no study has examined the usefulness of bilateral application of HF- and LF-rTMS (BL-rTMS). METHODS: Fifty-eight hemiparetic patients with acute stroke were randomly assigned into two groups: HF-rTMS group and BL-rTMS group. All patients were scheduled to receive five sessions of either HF-rTMS over the lesional hemisphere or BL-rTMS over both hemispheres for 5 days. Motor function of the affected upper limb was evaluated using the Brunnstrom Recovery Stage (BRS) for upper-limb and hand-fingers, grip strength and tapping frequency, before the first session and after the last session of rTMS. RESULTS: Improvement of BRS for the upper limb and hand/finger was significantly greater in the BL-rTMS group than the HF-rTMS group (p < 0.01). Improvement in grip strength and tapping frequency was also greater in the BL-rTMS group, although the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed BL-rTMS is safe and feasible and showed a greater improvement of BRS of the affected upper limb compared to HF-rTMS. This novel rTMS approach may be a useful intervention for hemiparetic patients with acute stroke.
Entities:
Keywords:
Neurological; rehabilitation; stroke; sub-acute care
Authors: James R Carey; Diane M Chappuis; Marsha J Finkelstein; Kate L Frost; Lynette K Leuty; Allison L McNulty; Lars I E Oddsson; Erin M Seifert; Teresa J Kimberley Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2017-03-01
Authors: Shan H Siddiqi; Nicholas T Trapp; Carl D Hacker; Timothy O Laumann; Sridhar Kandala; Xin Hong; Ludwig Trillo; Pashtun Shahim; Eric C Leuthardt; Alexandre R Carter; David L Brody Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Eline C C van Lieshout; Johanna M A Visser-Meily; Sebastiaan F W Neggers; H Bart van der Worp; Rick M Dijkhuizen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-08-28 Impact factor: 2.692