Literature DB >> 30352819

Scaling of claw sharpness: mechanical constraints reduce attachment performance in larger insects.

Jonathan G Pattrick1,2, David Labonte1,3, Walter Federle4.   

Abstract

Claws are the most widespread attachment devices in animals, but comparatively little is known about the mechanics of claw attachment. A key morphological parameter in determining attachment ability is claw sharpness; however, there is a conflict between sharpness and fracture resistance. Sharper claws can interlock on more surfaces but are more likely to break. Body size interacts with this conflict such that larger animals should have much blunter claws and consequently poorer attachment ability than smaller animals. This expected size-induced reduction in attachment performance has not previously been investigated, and it is unclear how animals deal with this effect, and whether it indeed exists. We explored the scaling of claw sharpness with body size using four insect species (Nauphoeta cinerea, Gromphadorhina portentosa, Atta cephalotes and Carausius morosus) each covering a large size range. The scaling of claw sharpness varied significantly between species, suggesting that they face different pressures regarding claw function. Attachment forces were measured for A. cephalotes and G. portentosa (which had different scaling of claw sharpness) on several rough surfaces using a centrifuge setup. As expected, attachment performance was poorer in larger animals. Firstly, larger animals were more likely to slip, although this effect depended on the scaling of claw sharpness. Secondly, when they gripped, they attached with smaller forces relative to their weight. This size-induced reduction in attachment performance has significant implications for the attachment ability of larger animals on rough surfaces.
© 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allometry; Attachment performance; Claw sharpness; Scaling

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30352819      PMCID: PMC6811360          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.188391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  28 in total

1.  Artificial selection on allometry: change in elevation but not slope.

Authors:  C K Egset; T F Hansen; A LE Rouzic; G H Bolstad; G Rosenqvist; C Pélabon
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.411

2.  Small but powerful: the oribatid mite Archegozetes longisetosus Aoki (Acari, Oribatida) produces disproportionately high forces.

Authors:  Michael Heethoff; Lars Koerner
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  The interplay between claw morphology and microhabitat use in neotropical iguanian lizards.

Authors:  M J Tulli; F B Cruz; A Herrel; B Vanhooydonck; V Abdala
Journal:  Zoology (Jena)       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  On the relationship between ontogenetic and static allometry.

Authors:  Christophe Pélabon; Geir H Bolstad; Camilla K Egset; James M Cheverud; Mihaela Pavlicev; Gunilla Rosenqvist
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Stick or grip? Co-evolution of adhesive toepads and claws in Anolis lizards.

Authors:  Kristen E Crandell; Anthony Herrel; Mahmood Sasa; Jonathan B Losos; Kellar Autumn
Journal:  Zoology (Jena)       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  At which surface roughness do claws cling? Investigations with larvae of the running water mayfly Epeorus assimilis (Heptageniidae, Ephemeroptera).

Authors:  Petra Ditsche-Kuru; Wilhelm Barthlott; Jochen H E Koop
Journal:  Zoology (Jena)       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Roughness-dependent friction force of the tarsal claw system in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae).

Authors:  Zhendong Dai; Stanislav N Gorb; Uli Schwarz
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Pedal claw curvature in birds, lizards and mesozoic dinosaurs--complicated categories and compensating for mass-specific and phylogenetic control.

Authors:  Aleksandra V Birn-Jeffery; Charlotte E Miller; Darren Naish; Emily J Rayfield; David W E Hone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  On Heels and Toes: How Ants Climb with Adhesive Pads and Tarsal Friction Hair Arrays.

Authors:  Thomas Endlein; Walter Federle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Surface contact and design of fibrillar 'friction pads' in stick insects (Carausius morosus): mechanisms for large friction coefficients and negligible adhesion.

Authors:  David Labonte; John A Williams; Walter Federle
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 4.118

View more
  2 in total

1.  Froghoppers jump from smooth plant surfaces by piercing them with sharp spines.

Authors:  Hanns Hagen Goetzke; Jonathan G Pattrick; Walter Federle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Get a grip-evolution of claw shape in relation to microhabitat use in intertidal arthropods (Acari, Oribatida).

Authors:  Tobias Pfingstl; Michaela Kerschbaumer; Satoshi Shimano
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.